oa Moras are about length not about weight

References

1. Altshuler, Daniel
   2009 “Quantity-Insensitive Iambs in Osage.” International Journal of American Linguistics75 (3): 365–398. 10.1086/605417
   https://doi.org/10.1086/605417 [Google Scholar]
2. Bell, Arthur
   2003 “Gemination, Degemination and Moraic Structure in Wolof.” Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory151: 1–68.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Foster, Michael
   1982 “Weak and Strong Syllables in Cayuga Words.” International Journal of American Linguistics481: 59–72. 10.1086/465713
   https://doi.org/10.1086/465713 [Google Scholar]
4. Hayes, Bruce
   1995 Metrical stress theory. Principles and case studies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Jacobson, Steven A.
   1985 “Siberian Yupik and Central Yupik Prosody.” Yupik Eskimo Prosodic Systems: Descriptive and Comparative Studiesed. byMichael Kraus. 25–45. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Ka, Omar
   1988 “Wolof Syllable Structure: Evidence from a Secret Code.” Proceedings of the Fifth Eastern States Conference on Linguisticsed. byJoyce Powers and Kenneth de Jong. 261–274. Columbus: Ohio State University.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Kager, René
   1992 “Are there any truly quantity-insensitive systems?” Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. byLaura Buszard-Welcher, Jonathan Evans, David Peterson, Lionel Wee and Wiliam Wiegel. Ann Arbor: Braun-Brumfield. 10.3765/bls.v18i1.3376
   https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v18i1.3376 [Google Scholar]
8. Kraehenmann, Astrid
   2001 “Swiss German Stops: Geminates All over the Word.” Phonology18 (1): 109–145. 10.1017/S0952675701004031
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675701004031 [Google Scholar]
9. Kraus, Michael
   1975 “St. Lawrence Island Eskimo Phonology and Orthography.” Linguistics, 1521: 39–72. 10.1515/ling.1975.13.152.39
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1975.13.152.39 [Google Scholar]
10. Kraus, Michael
    1985 “Supplementary Notes on Central Siberian Yupik Prosody.” Yupik Eskimo Prosodic Systems: Descriptive and Comparative Studiesed. byMichael Kraus. 47–50. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Leer, Jeff
    1985 “Toward a Metrical Interpretation of Yupik Prosody.” Yupik Eskimo Prosodic Systems: Descriptive and Comparative Studiesed. byMichael Kraus. 159–172. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.
    [Google Scholar]
12. McCarthy, John
    1988 “Feature geometry and dependency: A review.” Phonetica451: 84–108. 10.1159/000261820
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000261820 [Google Scholar]
13. McCarthy, John
    2010 “An introduction to harmonic serialism.” Language and Linguistics Compass41: 1001–1018. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2010.00240.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00240.x [Google Scholar]
14. McGregor, William
    1990 A Functional Grammar of Gooniyandi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.22
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.22 [Google Scholar]
15. Michelson, Karin
    1988 A Comparative Study of Accent in Five Nations Iroquoian Languages. PhD dissertation, Harvard University. Cambridge, Massachusetts. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑2709‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2709-4
16. Prince, Alan and Paul Smolensky
    1993 [2004] Optimality Theory. Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Rialland, Annie and Stéphane Robert
    2001 “The intonation system of Wolof.” Linguistics39 (5): 893–939. 10.1515/ling.2001.038
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2001.038 [Google Scholar]
18. Ryan, Kevin
    2020 “VV > VC > V for Stress: Coercion vs. Prominence.” Linguistic Inquiry51 (1): 124–139. 10.1162/ling_a_00325
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00325 [Google Scholar]