1887
Volume 39, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-7332
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9919

Abstract

Abstract

In French, the noun apple () is grammatically feminine, in German () it is masculine. Does this entail that French speakers perceive apples to be feminine whereas German speakers attribute masculine characteristics to them? Various studies suggest that grammatical gender does indeed influence object perception (Haertlé 2017Boroditsky & Schmidt 2000), although findings are not always replicated (Bender et al. 2011). The current study investigates this phenomenon for Polish, an understudied language in this domain, and German, a language for which contradictory results have been obtained. We investigated whether Polish ( = 21) and German ( = 27) speakers follow the grammatical gender of an object when providing a first name for it (e.g. James or Maya). Results suggest that while Polish speakers provided names that were in accordance with the object’s grammatical gender, German speakers did not. Cross-linguistic differences between these two languages (regarding noun transparency) may explain these findings.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00066.kur
2022-11-04
2022-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/avt.00066.kur.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00066.kur&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bender, Andreas, Sieghard Beller & Karl C. Klauer
    2011 “Grammatical gender in German: A case for linguistic relativity?” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology64 (9): 1821–1835. 10.1080/17470218.2011.582128
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.582128 [Google Scholar]
  2. Boroditsky, Lera & Lauren A. Schmidt
    2000 “Sex, syntax, and semantics.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society221: 1–6. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0jt9w8zf
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Clarke, Mark, Ann Losoff, Margaret Dickenson McCracken & JoAnn Still
    1981 “Gender perception in Arabic and English.” Language Learning, 31 (1): 159–169. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1981.tb01377.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1981.tb01377.x [Google Scholar]
  4. Fausey, Caitlin M. & Lera Boroditsky
    2011 “Who dunnit? Cross-linguistic differences in eye-witness memory.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18 (1): 150–157. 10.3758/s13423‑010‑0021‑5
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-010-0021-5 [Google Scholar]
  5. Haertlé, Izabella
    2017 “Does grammatical gender influence perception? A study of Polish and French speakers.” Psychology of Language and Communication, 21 (1): 386–407. 10.1515/plc‑2017‑0019
    https://doi.org/10.1515/plc-2017-0019 [Google Scholar]
  6. Hohlfeld, Anette
    2006 “Accessing grammatical gender in German: The impact of gender-marking regularities.” Applied Psycholinguistics27 (2): 127–142. 10.1017/S0142716406060218
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716406060218 [Google Scholar]
  7. Loftus, Elizabeth F. & John C. Palmer
    1974 “Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13 (5): 585–589. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(74)80011‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80011-3 [Google Scholar]
  8. Maciuszek, Józef, Mateusz Polak & Natalia Świa̧tkowska
    2019 “Grammatical gender influences semantic categorization and implicit cognition in Polish.” Frontiers in Psychology101: 2208. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02208
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02208 [Google Scholar]
  9. Sera, Maria D., Christian A. H. Berge & Javier del Castillo Pintado
    1994 “Grammatical and conceptual forces in the attribution of gender by English and Spanish speakers.” Cognitive Development, 9 (3): 261–292. 10.1016/0885‑2014(94)90007‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(94)90007-8 [Google Scholar]
  10. Sera, Maria D., Chyle Elieff, James Forbes, Melissa Clarke Burch, Wanda Rodríguez & Diane Poulin Dubois
    2002 “When language affects cognition and when it does not: An analysis of grammatical gender and classification.” Journal of Experimental Psychology. General131 (3): 377–397. 10.1037/0096‑3445.131.3.377
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.131.3.377 [Google Scholar]
  11. Vuksanović, Jasmina, Jovana Bjekić & Natalija Radivojević
    2015 “Grammatical gender and mental representation of object: The case of musical instruments.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44 (4): 383–397. 10.1007/s10936‑014‑9293‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9293-7 [Google Scholar]
  12. Whorf, Benjamin L.
    1956Language, thought, and reality. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00066.kur
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00066.kur
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error