1887
Volume 39, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-7332
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9919

Abstract

Abstract

Deictic co-speech gestures (DCSGs) are commonly regarded as intimately related to exophoric demonstrative forms; yet, no account is available that formalises this relation. This paper proposes that DCSGs spell-out part of the internal structure of exophoric demonstratives: concretely, they contribute the spatial coordinates (direction and distance, syntactically encoded by the Demonstrative ‘Dem’ head and by a Measure Phrase ‘MeasP’ that modifies it, respectively) that identify the location of the demonstrative’s referent and the deictic centre. This naturally captures the intuition that exophoric demonstratives and DCSGs are related, under a multi-modal spell-out approach to demonstrative forms. Further, this proposal is compatible with independent facts regarding both the grammaticalisation of demonstrative forms and their acquisition.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00071.ter
2022-11-04
2022-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/avt.00071.ter.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00071.ter&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bangerter, Adrian
    2004 “Using pointing and describing to achieve joint focus of attention in dialogue.” Psychological Science15(6): 415–419. 10.1111/j.0956‑7976.2004.00694.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00694.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Bohnemeyer, Jürgen
    2018 “Yucatec demonstratives in interaction: spontaneous vs. elicited data.” Demonstratives in Cross-Linguistic Perspectiveed. byStephen C. Levinson, Sarah Cutfield, Michael J. Dunn, Nick J. Enfield and Sérgio Meira. 176–205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108333818.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108333818.009 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bühler, Karl
    1934Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Fischer.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bye, Patrik & Peter Svenonius
    2012 “Non-concatenative morphology as an epiphenomenon.” The morphology and phonology of exponenceed. byJochen Trommer. 427–495. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573721.003.0013
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573721.003.0013 [Google Scholar]
  5. Clark, Eve Vivienne
    1978 “From gesture to word: On the natural history of deixis in language acquisition.” Human Growth and Developmented. byJerome Seymour Bruner and Alison Garton. 85–120. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Clark, Eve Vivienne & C. J. Sengul
    1978 “Strategies in the acquisition of deixis”. Journal of Child Language5(3): 457–475. 10.1017/S0305000900002099
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900002099 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cooperrider, Kensy
    2021 “Fifteen ways of looking at a pointing gesture.” Unpublished manuscript. 10.31234/osf.io/2vxft
    https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2vxft [Google Scholar]
  8. Cooperrider, Kensy, Jordan Fenlon, Jonathan Keane, Diane Brentari & Susan Goldin-Meadow
    2021 “How pointing is integrated into language: Evidence from speakers and signers.” Frontiers in Communication61: 567774. 10.3389/fcomm.2021.567774
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.567774 [Google Scholar]
  9. Davis, Colin
    2021 “The morpho-syntactic significance of the unextractability of English possessive pronouns.” Unpublished manuscript. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/006212
  10. Diessel, Holger
    1999Demonstratives: Form, Function, and Grammaticalization. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.42
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.42 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2006 “Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar.” Cognitive Linguistics17(4): 463–489. 10.1515/COG.2006.015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.015 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2013 “Distance contrasts in demonstratives.” The World Atlas of Language Structures Onlineed. byMatthew S. Dryer and Martin Haspelmath. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. https://wals.info/chapter/41
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Diessel, Holger & Kenny R. Coventry
    2020 “Demonstratives in spatial language and social interaction: An interdisciplinary review.” Frontiers in Psychology111: 555265. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.555265
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.555265 [Google Scholar]
  14. Forker, Diana
    2020 “Elevation as a grammatical and semantic category of demonstratives.” Frontiers in Psychology111: 1712. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01712
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01712 [Google Scholar]
  15. Garciá, Juan L. P., Katrine Rosendal Ehlers & Kristian Tylén
    2017 “Bodily constraints contributing to multimodal referentiality in humans: The contribution of a de-pigmented sclera to proto-declaratives.” Language & Communication541: 73–81. 10.1016/j.langcom.2016.10.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2016.10.007 [Google Scholar]
  16. Harbour, Daniel
    2016Impossible Persons. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262034739.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262034739.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Herrmann, Stephanie
    2018 “Warao demonstratives.” Demonstratives in Cross-Linguistic Perspectiveed. byStephen C. Levinson, Sarah Cutfield, Michael J. Dunn, Nick J. Enfield and Sérgio Meira. 282–302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108333818.014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108333818.014 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hinterwimmer, Stefan
    2019 “How to point at discourse referents. On anaphoric uses of complex demonstratives.” Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung231, ed. byM. Teresa Espinal, Elena Castroviejo, Manuel Leonetti, Louise McNally and Cristina Real-Puigdollers. 495–514. https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/sub/index.php/sub/article/view/546/445
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Iverson, Jana M. & Susan Goldin-Meadow
    2005 “Gesture paves the way for language development.” Psychological Science16(5): 367–373. 10.1111/j.0956‑7976.2005.01542.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01542.x [Google Scholar]
  20. Kendon, Adam
    2004Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kita, Sotaro
    2003 “Pointing: A foundational building block of human communication.” Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meeted. bySotaro Kita. 1–8. Mahwah, NJ / London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 10.4324/9781410607744‑5
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607744-5 [Google Scholar]
  22. Küntay, Aylin C. & Aslı Özyürek
    2006 “Learning to use demonstratives in conversation: What do language specific strategies in Turkish reveal?” Journal of Child Language33(2): 303–320. 10.1017/S0305000906007380
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000906007380 [Google Scholar]
  23. Levinson, Stephen C.
    2004 “Deixis.” The handbook of pragmatics, ed. byLaurence H. Horn and Gregory Ward. 97–121. London: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. McNeill, David
    1992Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Meira, Sérgio
    2018 “Tiriyó: Non-contrastive exophoric uses of demonstratives.” Demonstratives in Cross-Linguistic Perspectiveed. byStephen C. Levinson, Sarah Cutfield, Michael J. Dunn, Nick J. Enfield and Sérgio Meira. 222–241. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108333818.011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108333818.011 [Google Scholar]
  26. Mesh, Kate
    2017 “Points of comparison: What indicating gestures tell us about the origins of signs in San Juan Quiahije Chatino Sign Language.” PhD diss., University of Texas at Austin.
  27. Mesh, Kate, Emiliana Cruz, Joost van de Weijer, Niclas Burenhult & Marianne Gullberg
    2021 “Effects of scale on multimodal deixis: Evidence from Quiahije Chatino.” Frontiers in Psychology111: 584231. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584231
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584231 [Google Scholar]
  28. Ozçalişkan, Şeyda & Susan Goldin-Meadow
    2005 “Gesture is at the cutting edge of early language development.” Cognition96(3): B101–B113. 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  29. Peeters, David, Mingyuan Chu, Judith Holler, Peter Hagoort & Aslı Özyürek
    2015 “Electrophysiological and kinematic correlates of communicative intent in the planning and production of pointing gestures and speech.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience27(12): 2352–2368. 10.1162/jocn_a_00865
    https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00865 [Google Scholar]
  30. Peeters, David, Emiel Krahmer & Alfons Maes
    2021 “A conceptual framework for the study of demonstrative reference.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review28(2): 409–433. 10.3758/s13423‑020‑01822‑8
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01822-8 [Google Scholar]
  31. Roberts, Craige
    2002 “Demonstratives as definites.” Information sharing. Reference and presupposition in language generation and interpretation, ed. byKees van Deemter and Rodger Kibble. 89–196. Stanford, CA: CSLI Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Schlenker, Philippe
    2020 “Gestural grammar.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory381: 887–936. 10.1007/s11049‑019‑09460‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-019-09460-z [Google Scholar]
  33. Svenonius, Peter
    2008 “Projections of P.” Syntax and Semantics of Spatial Ped. byAnna Asbury, Jakub Dotlačil, Berit Gehrke and Rick Nouwen. 63–84. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.120.04sve
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.120.04sve [Google Scholar]
  34. 2010 “Spatial P in English.” Mapping Spatial PPs: The Cartography of Syntactic Structuresed. byGuglielmo Cinque and Luigi Rizzi. 127–160. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  35. 2016 “Spans and words.” Morphological metatheoryed. byDaniel Siddiqi and Heidi Harley. 201–222. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.229.07sve
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.229.07sve [Google Scholar]
  36. 2020 “A span is a thing: A span-based theory of words.” NELS 50: Proceedings of the Fiftieth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Societyed. byMariam Asatryan, Yixiao Song and Ayana Whitmal. 193–206. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Tanz, Christine
    1980Studies in the acquisition of deictic terms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Terenghi, Silvia
    2022 “Missing Person Structure and change in Romance demonstratives”. PhD diss., Utrecht University.
  39. Zwarts, Joost
    1997 “Vectors as relative positions: A compositional semantics of modified PPs.” Journal of Semantics141: 57–86. 10.1093/jos/14.1.57
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/14.1.57 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00071.ter
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): deictic co-speech gestures; demonstratives; multi-modal spell-out; syntax
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error