Volume 39, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-7332
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9919



There are two comparative suffixes in Ukrainian: the productive , and the non-productive . Following Caha et al. (2019) I show that just like in Czech, the distribution of these two suffixes in Ukrainian is regulated not by phonology, but by morphosyntax. The theory of Nanosyntax (Starke 2009) is used in order to account for the data. The comparative meaning is represented in syntax not by one but by two functional heads. To be more precise, I propose that in Ukrainian is decomposed into two morphemes and , where spells out the lower head and spells out the higher one. The issue of suppletive adjectives is discussed as well. I argue that suppletion can be accounted for using the nanosyntactic concept of pointers. As a result, this approach helps to explain the mechanism behind allomorphy of the comparative suffix in regular and suppletive adjectives in Ukrainian.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.

Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Arregi, Karlos & Andrew Nevins
    2014 “A monoradical approach to some cases of disupple-tion.” Theoretical Linguistics40(3–4): 311–330. 10.1515/tl‑2014‑0014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2014-0014 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baunaz, Lena & Eric Lander
    2018 “Nanosyntax: the basics.” Exploring Nanosyntax, ed. byLena Baunaz, Karen De Clercq, Liliane Haegeman & Eric Lander. 3–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190876746.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190876746.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bevzenko, Stepan Pylypovyč
    1960Istoryčna morfolohia ukrajin’skoji movy. ‘the historical morphology of the ukrainian language”. Uzhhorod: Zakarpats’ke Oblastne Vydavnytstvo.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bobaljik, Jonathan
    2012Universals In Comparative Morphology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9069.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9069.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Caha, Pavel, Karen De Clercq & Guido Vanden Wyngaerd
    2019 “The fine structure of the comparative.” Studia Linguistica73(3): 470–521. 10.1111/stul.12107
    https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12107 [Google Scholar]
  6. Corver, Norbert
    1997 “Much-support as a last resort.” Linguistic Inquiry281: 119–164.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. De Clercq, Karen, Pavel Caha, Michal Starke & Guido Vanden Wyngaerd
    2022 “Degree morphology.” The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology, ed. byPeter Ackema, Eulàlia Bonet, Sabrina Bendjaballah & Antonio Fábregas. Blackwell Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. De Clercq, Karen & Guido Vanden Wyngaerd
    2017 “*ABA revisited: evidence from Czech and Latin degree morphology.” Glossa2(1): 691: 1–32. 10.5334/gjgl.371
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.371 [Google Scholar]
  9. Despić, Miloje
    2019 “(non-)intersective adjectives and root suppletion.” The Linguistic Review361: 507–530. 10.1515/tlr‑2019‑2027
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2019-2027 [Google Scholar]
  10. Embick, David
    2010Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262014229.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014229.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Starke, Michal
    2009 “Nanosyntax: A short primer to a new approach to language.” Nordlyd361: 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2014 “Cleaning up the lexicon.” Linguistic Analysis391: 245–256.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Vanden Wyngaerd, Guido, Michal Starke, Karen De Clercq & Pavel Caha
    2020 “How to be positive.” Glossa5(1): 23. 1–34. 10.5334/gjgl.1114
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1114 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): allomorphy; comparatives; morphology; nanosyntax; suppletion; Ukrainian
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error