1887
Volume 40, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-7332
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9919

Abstract

Abstract

In this article, we focus on the origin of the Wolof subject-focus construction (SFC) from a dynamic perspective. In Wolof, argument focus is expressed morpho-syntactically by means of copulaless cleft constructions consisting of the juxtaposition of the focus and a free relative clause. The free relative clause is headed by a determiner, which takes the form in the case of the SFC. The determiner is not found anywhere else in the language outside of SFC. We hypothesise that Wolof borrowed its SFC from Berber languages. The sociohistorical scenario, based on oral tradition, could have been the emergence of Wolof, as a crucible of contact between peoples of diverse origin including Berber groups. This finding is strengthened by the occurrence of other elements common to Wolof and Berber languages, such as clitic attraction, negation, copula insertion, as well as a number of lexical parallelisms.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00076.bou
2023-11-03
2025-02-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/avt.00076.bou.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00076.bou&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Amazit-Hamidchi, Fadma & Mohand Lounaci
    2005Le kabyle de poche. Paris: Assimil.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bao Diop, Sokhna
    2017Le baynunk guñaamolo, une langue du sud du Sénégal. Analyse phonologique, morphologique et syntaxique. Paris: L’Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailey, Charles-James N.
    1973Variation and Linguistic Theory. Arlington, Virginia: Center for Applied Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Boulègue, Jean
    1987Le Grand Jolof. Paris: Diffusion Karthala.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bourdeau, Corentin
    . N.d., accepted. “The Wolof argument-focus constructions as copulaless clefts”. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics. 10.1515/jall‑2023‑2011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jall-2023-2011 [Google Scholar]
  6. Dallet, Jean-Marie
    1985Dictionnaire Français-Kabyle : Parler Des At Mangellat, Algérie [2]. Paris: Selaf.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. de Motylinski, Adolphe
    1908Grammaire, Dialogues et Dictionnaire Touaregs [1]. Alger: Imprimerie orientale Pierre Fontana.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Diouf, Jean-Léopold
    2009Grammaire Du Wolof Contemporain. Paris: L’Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Faidherbe, Léon
    1877Le Zenaga Des Tribus Sénégalaises : Contribution à l’étude de La Langue Berbère, 〈gallica.bnf.fr
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fagerberg, Sonja
    1983 Discourse strategies in Pulaar the use of focus. Studies in African Linguistics, 14(2), 141–158. 10.32473/sal.v14i2.107528
    https://doi.org/10.32473/sal.v14i2.107528 [Google Scholar]
  11. Favaron, Pedro
    2022 “La Pedagogía de la Madre Tierra: una propuesta reflexiva a partir de las prácticas y testimonios del sabio indígena Abadio Green Stocel”. Interpretatio. Revista de hermenéutica7(2): 129–154. 10.19130/irh.2022.7.2.00X27S0037
    https://doi.org/10.19130/irh.2022.7.2.00X27S0037 [Google Scholar]
  12. Faye, Waly
    1979 “Etude morphosyntaxique du sereer singandum : parler de Jaxaaw et de Ñaaxar”. PhD dissertation, Grenoble: Université Stendhal – Grenoble.
  13. Faye, Souleymane & Maarten Mous
    2006 “Verbal system and diathesis derivations in Seereer”. Africana Linguistica12(1): 89–112. 10.3406/aflin.2006.963
    https://doi.org/10.3406/aflin.2006.963 [Google Scholar]
  14. Galand, Lionel
    2014 “Typology of relative clauses: the case of Berber”. STUF – Language Typology and Universals67(1): 81–96. 10.1515/stuf‑2014‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2014-0007 [Google Scholar]
  15. Heath, Jeffrey
    2005A Grammar of Tamashek (Tuareg of Mali). Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110909586
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110909586 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2006Dictionnaire touareg du Mali: tamachek-anglais-français. Paris: Karthala.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Levtzion, Nehemia
    1978 “The Sahara and the Sudan from the Arab Conquest of the Maghrib to the rise of the Almoravids”. The Cambridge History of Africa [2] ed. byJohn D. Fage & Roland Oliver, 637–384. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2000 “Islam in the Bilad al-Sudan to 1800”. The history of Islam in Africaed. byNehemia Levtzion & Randall Pouwels, 63–91. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lüpke, Friederike
    2016 “Pure fiction – the interplay of indexical and essentialist language ideologies and heterogeneous practices. A view from Agnack”. African language documentation: new data, methods and approacheded. byMandana Seyfeddinipur, 8–39. University of Hawai’i Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2017 “African(ist) perspectives on vitality: Fluidity, small speaker numbers, and adaptive multilingualism make vibrant ecologies (Response to Mufwene)”. Language93(4): 275–279. 10.1353/lan.2017.0071
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2017.0071 [Google Scholar]
  21. McLaughlin, Fiona
    1997 “Noun classification in Wolof when affixes are not renewed”. Studies in African Linguistics26(1): 1–28. 10.32473/sal.v26i1.107395
    https://doi.org/10.32473/sal.v26i1.107395 [Google Scholar]
  22. Merrill, John T. M.
    2021 “The evolution of consonant mutation and noun class marking in Wolof”. Diachronica38(1): 64–110. 10.1075/dia.18046.mer
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.18046.mer [Google Scholar]
  23. Mettouchi, Amina
    2009 “The system of negation in Berber”. Negation Patterns in West African Languages and Beyonded. byNorbert Cyffer, Erwin Ebermann & Georg Ziegelmeyer, 287–306. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.87.14met
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.87.14met [Google Scholar]
  24. Mettouchi, Amina & Axel Fleisch
    2010 “Topic-Focus Articulation in Taqbaylit and Tashelhit Berber”. The expression of information structure. A documentation of its diversity across Africaed. byInes Fiedler & Anne Schwarz, 193–232. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.91.08met
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.91.08met [Google Scholar]
  25. Naro, Anthony J.
    1978 “A Study on the Origins of Pidginization”. Language54(2): 314–347. 10.2307/412950
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412950 [Google Scholar]
  26. Oulhadj, Lahsen
    2014English-Amazigh (Tashlhit). www.academia.edu/12579763/ENGLISH_AMAZIGH_TASHLHIT_
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Pozdniakov, Konstantin & Guillaume Segerer
    2017 “A Genealogical classification of Atlantic languages”. Oxford Guide to the World’s Languages: Atlanticed. byFriederike Lüpke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Price, Richard
    1990Alabi’s World. JohnHopkins University Press. 10.56021/9780801838620
    https://doi.org/10.56021/9780801838620 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2002 “Maroons in Suriname and Guyane: How Many and Where”. NWIG: New West Indian Guide / Nieuwe West-Indische Gids76(1/2): 81–88. 10.1163/13822373‑90002544
    https://doi.org/10.1163/13822373-90002544 [Google Scholar]
  30. Price, Richard & Sally Price
    2002Les Marrons en Guyane. Châteauneuf-le-Rouge: Vents d’ailleurs.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Robbeets, Martine, Remco Bouckaert, Matthew Conte, Alexander Savelyev, Tao Li, Deog-Im An, Ken-ichi Shinoda,
    2021 “Triangulation supports agricultural spread of the Transeurasian languages”. Nature599(7886): 616–621. 10.1038/s41586‑021‑04108‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04108-8 [Google Scholar]
  32. Robert, Stéphane
    2000 “Le verbe wolof our la grammaticalisation du focus”. Topicalisation et focalisation dans les langues africainesed. byBernard Caron, 229–267. Louvain: Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 2018 “Predication in Wolof (Niger-Congo)”. Corpus-based cross-linguistic studies on Predication (CorTypo)ed. byAmina Mettouchi, Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Christian Chanard. 〈cortypo.huma-num.fr
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Rojas-Berscia, Luis Miguel
    2020 “The Chachapuya language and Proto-Kawapanan: Lexical Affinities and Hypothetical Contact Scenarios”. INDIANA34(1): 155–188.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2021Pre-Historical Language Contact in Peruvian Amazonia: A Dynamic Approach to Shawi (Kawapanan) [Contact Language Library]. Vol.581. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/coll.58
    https://doi.org/10.1075/coll.58 [Google Scholar]
  36. Seuren, Pieter A. M.
    1982 “Internal variability in competence”. Linguistische Berichte771: 1–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Shoup, John
    2007 “The griot tradition in Hassāniyya music: the “iggāwen”.” Quaderni di Studi Arabi21: 95–102.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 2014 “Saharan Crossroads Music in Tarab al-Baydan: The Iggawin”. Saharan crossroads: Exploring historical, cultural, and artistic linkages between North and West Africa [Chapter 8] ed. byTara F. Deubel, Scott M. Youngstedt & Hélène Tissières. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Suleimanova, Olga & Marina Fomina
    2023 “Triangulation as a Research Method in Experimental Linguistics”. Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing [Lecture Notes in Computer Science] ed. byAlexander Gelbukh, 109–120. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑24340‑0_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24340-0_9 [Google Scholar]
  40. Taine-Cheikh, Catherine
    2008Dictionnaire Zénaga-Français. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2010 “The role of the Berber deictic ad and TAM markers in dependent clauses in Zenaga”. Clause Linking and Clause Hierarchy. Syntax and pragmaticsed. byIsabelle Bril, 355–398. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.121.11tai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.121.11tai [Google Scholar]
  42. 2011 “L’énoncé négatif en berbère zenaga”. Parcours berbèresed. byAmina Mettouchi, 533–551. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Tamari, Tal
    1991 “The Development of Caste Systems in West Africa”. The Journal of African History32(2): 221–250. 10.1017/S0021853700025718
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021853700025718 [Google Scholar]
  44. Thurston, William
    1987Processes of Change in the Languages of North-Western New Britain [Pacific Linguistic: Series B 99]. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Urban, Matthias
    2021 “Cholón and the linguistic prehistory of northern Peru: triangulating toponymy, substrate lexis, and areal typology”. Linguistic Discovery17(1): 63–83. 10.1349/PS1.1537‑0852.A.513
    https://doi.org/10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.513 [Google Scholar]
  46. Webb, James L. A.
    1995 “The Evolution of the Idaw al-Hajj Commercial Diaspora”. Cahiers d’études africaines35(138–139): 455–475. 10.3406/cea.1995.1456
    https://doi.org/10.3406/cea.1995.1456 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00076.bou
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00076.bou
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Berber; cleft; contact; subject focus; Wolof
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error