oa Finding a geographical basis for split noun phrases in the Netherlands and Belgium

References

1. Bošković, Z.
   2005 “On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP”. Studia Linguistica59(1): 1–45. 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.2005.00118.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2005.00118.x [Google Scholar]
2. Christensen, R. H. B.
   2022 “ordinal – Regression Models for Ordinal Data.” R package version 2022.11–16. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ordinal
   [Google Scholar]
3. Corver, Norbert, Marjo van Koppen, H. Kranendonk & M. Rigterink
   2011 Database Diversity in Dutch DP Design (DDiDD). Utrecht, UiL-OTS. URL: www.meertens.knaw.nl/dp_vragenlijst/
   [Google Scholar]
4. Devine, A. & Stephens, L.
   2000 Discontinuous syntax: hyperbaton in Greek. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195132700.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195132700.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
5. Doreleijers, Kristel, Marjo van Koppen & Jos Swanenberg
   2021 “De dynamiek van geslachtsmarkering in de Noord-Brabantse dialecten”. Taal en Tongval72(1): 69–116. 10.5117/TET2020.1.DORE
   https://doi.org/10.5117/TET2020.1.DORE [Google Scholar]
6. Fanselow, G.
   1988 “Aufspaltung von NPn un das Problem der ‘freien’ Wortstellung”. Linguistische Berichte1141: 91–113.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Fanselow, G. & D. Ćavar
   2002 “Distributed deletion”. InTheoretical approaches to universals, Volume 94 of Linguistik Aktuell, ed. byArtemis Alexiadou, 65–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.49.05fan
   https://doi.org/10.1075/la.49.05fan [Google Scholar]
8. Fanselow, G. & C. Féry, C.
   2006 “Prosodic and Morphosyntactic Aspects of Discontinuous Noun Phrases: a Comparative Perspective”. Ms., Universität Potsdam.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Giusti, G. & R. Iovino
   2016 “Latin as a split-DP language”. Studia Linguistica10(3): 221–249. 10.1111/stul.12045
   https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12045 [Google Scholar]
10. Junghanns, U.
    2021 Split noun phrases in Slavic Languages [Handout].
    [Google Scholar]
11. Lühr, R.
    2016 “Discontinuous Syntax: Hyperbaton in Older Indo-European Languages”. InAnatolica et Indogermanica, ed. byH. Marquardt, S. Reichmuth & J. Trabazo, 153–166. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Mensching, G.
    2020 “On “partitive dislocation” in Sardinian: A Romance and Minimalist perspective”. Linguistics58(3): 805–835. 10.1515/ling‑2020‑0087
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0087 [Google Scholar]
13. Nakanishi, K.
    2005 “Semantic properties of split topicalization in German”. InEvent arguments: foundations and applications, volume 501 of Linguistische Arbeitened. byC. Maienborn, A. Wöllstein, 331–356. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110913798.331
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110913798.331 [Google Scholar]
14. Nakanishi, K.
    2007 Formal properties of measurement constructions. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198485
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198485 [Google Scholar]
15. Nicolae, A.
    2020 “Discontinuous nominal constituents in Old Romanian: empirical analysis and theoretical relevance” [Handout]. Anglia Ruskin – Cambridge Romance Linguistics Seminars February 13th, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Nolda, A.
    2007 Die Thema-Integration. Syntax and Semantik der ‘gespaltenen Topikalisierung’ im Deutschen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Ott, D.
    2011 “Local Instability”. PhD Dissertation, Harvard University.
18. Puig-Waldmüller, E.
    2006 “Wörter stehen da einige. On nominal split topicalization in non-standard Viennese German”. Master’s thesis, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    [Google Scholar]
19. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2018 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
20. Roehrs, D.
    2009 “Split NPs”. Ms., University of North Texas.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Swanenberg, Jos
    2013 “All dialects are equal, but some dialects are more equal than others”. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, paper 43.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Tappe, H.
    1989 “A note on split topicalization in German”. InSyntactic phrase-structure phenomena in noun phrases and sentences, Volume 6 of Linguistik Aktuell, ed. byC. Bhatt, E. Löbel & C. Schmidt, 159–179. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.6.11tap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.6.11tap [Google Scholar]
23. Van Hoof, H.
    1997 “Left Dislocation and Split Topics in Brabant Dutch”. InMaterials on Left Dislocationed. byE. Anagnostopoulou, H. van Riemsdijk, F. Zwarts, 275–306). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.14.14hoo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.14.14hoo [Google Scholar]
24. Van Hoof, H.
    2006 “Split topicalization”. InThe Blackwell Companion to Syntax, VolumeI1, ed. byM. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk, 408–462. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470996591.ch62
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996591.ch62 [Google Scholar]
25. Van Riemsdijk, Henk
    1989 “Movement and regeneration”. InDialect variation and the theory of grammar, ed. byP. Benincà, 105–136. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110869255‑006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110869255-006 [Google Scholar]