oa Left dislocation in Dutch

References

1. Chafe, Wallace
   1976 “Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view.” InSubject and Topic, ed. byCharles Li, 25–55. New York: Academic Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Contemori, Carla & Paola E. Dussias
   2016 “Referential choice in a second language: Evidence for a listener-oriented approach.” Language, Cognition and Neuroscience31(10): 1257–1272. 10.1080/23273798.2016.1220604
   https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1220604 [Google Scholar]
3. Den Hartog, Maria, Helen de Hoop, Michelle Suijkerbuijk, & Imke Wets
   2023, February3. “Gert die zei …” A corpus study on double marking in spoken Dutch [Conference presentation]. Grote Taaldag 2023, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
   [Google Scholar]
4. De Vries, Mark
   2009 “The left and right periphery in Dutch.” Linguistic Review26(2–3): 291–327. 10.1515/tlir.2009.011
   https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2009.011 [Google Scholar]
5. Foster, Pauline, Alan Tonkyn, & Gillian Wigglesworth
   2000 “Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons.” Applied linguistics21(3), 354–375. 10.1093/applin/21.3.354
   https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.354 [Google Scholar]
6. Geluykens, Ronald
   1992 From discourse process to grammatical construction: On Left Dislocation in English (Studies in Discourse and Grammar, v.1.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/sidag.1
   https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.1 [Google Scholar]
7. Grosz, Barbara J., Aravind K. Joshi & Scott Weinstein
   1995 “Centering: A framework for modeling the logical coherence of discourse.” Computational Linguistics211: 203–225.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Hendriks, Petra, Charlotte Koster & John C. Hoeks
   2014 “Referential choice across the lifespan: Why children and elderly adults produce ambiguous pronouns.” Language, Cognition and Neuroscience29(4): 391–407. 10.1080/01690965.2013.766356
   https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.766356 [Google Scholar]
9. Prince, Ellen F.
   1998 “On the limits of syntax, with reference to Left-Dislocation and Topicalization”. InSyntax and Semantics. Volume 29: The Limits of Syntax, ed. byP. Culicover & Louise McNally, 281–302. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004373167_011
   https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373167_011 [Google Scholar]
10. Reinhart, Tanya
    1981 “Pragmatics and linguistics: an analysis of sentence topics.” Philosophica27(1): 53–94. 10.21825/philosophica.82606
    https://doi.org/10.21825/philosophica.82606 [Google Scholar]
11. Rosenbach, Anette
    2008 “Animacy and grammatical variation – Findings from English genitive variation.” Lingua118(2): 151–171. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.002 [Google Scholar]
12. Ross, John Robert
    1967 “Constraints on variables in syntax”. PhD diss., MIT Cambridge.
13. Stoop, Wessel
    2011 “CLD, dat is niet contrastief.” TABU39(1/2): 49–61.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Veeninga, Maaike, Sanne Kuijper & Petra Hendriks
    2011 “Steunpronomina die komen overal voor.” TABU39(3/4): 111–130.
    [Google Scholar]