1887
Volume 40, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-7332
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9919

Abstract

Abstract

Dutch children temporarily use a possessor construction with proper/kinship names and pronouns, like (‘this is Laura’s/grandpa’s/his coat’). The possessive is not available in standard Dutch, although examples of it are found on the internet. The possessive is fully productive with all nouns in Afrikaans.

In standard Dutch prenominal possessive constructions show a wide range of variations and restrictions. Dutch children avoid the complexity of the system, but what makes the children apply the possessive in the first place? I will show that it is due to three properties specific to Dutch. Nevertheless, the possessive does not persist in standard Dutch as it did in Afrikaans. The Dutch Achilles’ heel might be the early use of weak possessive pronouns.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00084.van
2023-11-03
2024-07-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/avt.00084.van.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00084.van&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Besten, Hans den
    2004 “The origins of the Afrikaans pre-nominal possessive system(s).” Manuscript, University of Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brill, E. J.
    1938Jaarboek van de Maatschappij der Nederlandsche Letterkunde te Leiden. www.dbnl.org/tekst/_jaa003193801_01/downloads.php
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Corver, Norbert
    1990 “The syntax of left branch extractions.” PhD diss., Tilburg University.
  4. Corver, Norbert & Marjo van Koppen
    2010 “Ellipsis in Dutch possessive noun phrases: a micro-comparative approach.” The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics131: 99–140. 10.1007/s10828‑010‑9034‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-010-9034-8 [Google Scholar]
  5. Donaldson, Bruce
    1993A Grammar of Afrikaans. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110863154
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110863154 [Google Scholar]
  6. Kampen, Jacqueline van
    2007 “Relative agreement in Dutch”. InLinguistics in the Netherlands 2007ed. byMarjo van Koppen & Bettelou Los, 112–125. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kampen, Jacqueline van & Norbert Corver
    2006 “Diversity of possessor marking in Dutch child language and Dutch dialects.” InVariation in Sprachtheorie und Spracherwerbed. byMaurice Vliegen, 385–398. Berlin: Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kampen, Jacqueline van & Frank Wijnen
    2000 “Grammaticale ontwikkeling.” InKindertaalverwerving. Een Handboek voor het Nederlandsed. bySteven Gillis & Annemarie Schaerlaekens, 225–285. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. MacWhinney, Brian
    2015The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Southwood, Frenette & Roeland van Hout
    2009 “Linguistic characteristics of specific language impairment in Afrikaans.” Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics PLUS371: 103–142.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Weerman, Fred, Jannetje Bisschop & Laura Punt
    2006 “L1 and L2 Acquisition of Dutch Adjectival Flexion.” ACLC Working Papers11: 5–36.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00084.van
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00084.van
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error