1887
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2013
  • ISSN 0929-7332
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9919

Abstract

This paper questions the assumption made in classic Optimality Theory (Prince & Smolensky 1993 [2004]) that markedness constraints are an innate part of Universal Grammar. Instead, we argue that constraints are acquired on the basis of the language data to which L1 learning children are exposed. This is argued both on general grounds (innateness is an assumption that should not be invoked lightly) and on the basis of empirical evidence. We investigate this issue for six general markedness constraints in French, and show that all constraints could be acquired on the basis of the ambient data. Second, we show that the order of acquisition of the marked structures matches the frequency of violations of the relevant constraints in the input quite well. This argues in favour of a phonological model in which constraints are acquired, not innate, i.e. a model in which grammatical notions such as constraints are derived from language use.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/avt.30.14van
2013-01-01
2019-12-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/avt.30.14van
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): constraints , frequency , grammar , innateness , L1 acquisition , Optimality Theory , Universal Grammar and usage
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error