Volume 34, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-7332
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9919


German, Dutch and English have surprisingly large sets of verbal diminutives: verbs ending in -/- and carrying an attenuative and/or iterative meaning. These verbs exhibit particular properties that make them interesting for morphological theory. Focussing on Dutch data, this paper sketches the challenges that arise with respect to structure, productivity and meaning, and proposes a constructionist account that allows for a better understanding of the issues. The central notion is the , a generalization over the structure of complex words. In contrast to rules, whose main function is to generate new words, schemas existing words by marking their structure as non-arbitrary. We discuss the modelling options this gives us and apply them to the verbal diminutives.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Bauer, Laurie , Rochelle Lieber & Ingo Plag
    2013The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747062.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747062.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Booij, Geert
    2010Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2017 “Inheritance and motivation in Construction Morphology.” Defaults in Morphological Theory. ed. by N. Gisborne & A. Hippisley . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Booij, Geert & Jenny Audring
    . forthcoming. “Partial motivation, multiple motivation: the role of output schemas in morphology.” The construction of words, Advances in Construction Morphology ed. by G. Booij . Dordrecht: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Culicover, Peter & Ray Jackendoff
    2005Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  6. De Haas, Wim & Mieke Trommelen
    1993Morfologisch Handboek van het Nederlands. Een overzicht van de woordvorming. Den Haag: Sdu Uitgevers.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Goldberg, Adele E. 1995Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale
    2013The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Jackendoff, Ray
    2002Foundations of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  10. Jackendoff, Ray & Jenny Audring
    . forthcoming. The texture of the lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2016 “Morphological schemas: Theoretical and psycholinguistic issues.” The Mental Lexicon11(3): 467–493. doi: 10.1075/ml.11.3.06jac.
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.11.3.06jac [Google Scholar]
  12. Jager, Arie de
    1875Woordenboek der frequentatieven in het Nederlandsch. Gouda: G.B. van Goor.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lakoff, George
    1987Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  14. Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Günter Radden
    eds. 2011Motivation in grammar and the lexicon. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.27
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.27 [Google Scholar]
  15. Philippa, Marlies , Frans Debrabandere & Arend Quak
    2003Etymologisch woordenboek van het Nederlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Radden, Günter & Klaus-Uwe Panther
    eds. 2004Studies in linguistic motivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. de Saussure, Ferdinand
    1916/1977Cours de linguistique générale, ed. by C. Bally and A. Sechehaye , with the collaboration of A. Riedlinger . Lausanne and Paris: Payot; trans. by W. Baskin , Course in general linguistics, Glasgow: Fontana/Collins.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Schönfeld, Moritz & Adolphe Van Loey
    1964Schönfelds historische grammatica van het Nederlands: Klankleer, vormleer, woordvorming. Zutphen: Thieme.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Weidhaas, Thomas & Hans-Jörg Schmid
    2015 “Diminutive verbs in German: semantic analysis and theoretical implications.” Morphology25(2). 183–228. doi: 10.1007/s11525‑015‑9258‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-015-9258-z [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Construction Morphology; frequentatives; Germanic; motivation; schema; verbal diminutives
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error