1887
Volume 34, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-7332
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9919
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Children acquire the meaning of ‘also’ in Dutch relatively late ( Bergsma 2006 ), although this focus particle is highly frequent. We argue that this late acquisition is caused by a pragmatic rule: contrastive implicature. We follow Sæbø (2004) , who argues that additives are used because without them, the sentences they appear in would be interpreted as contrastive in relation to the context. Data from a sentence completion task administered to Dutch L1 learners ( = 62, ages 4;0–5;11) show that, on average, four-year-olds do not distinguish sentences with from sentences without . Five-year-olds do better on sentences with but worse on sentences without it. We argue that they have generally acquired contrastive implicature: they apply the correct contrastive interpretation to sentences without , but overgeneralize this implicature to sentences with , before completely acquiring the meaning of

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/avt.34.10wol
2017-11-23
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bates, Douglas , Martin Maechler , Ben Bolker & Steve Walker
    2015 “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software67(1): 1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  2. Benazzo, Sandra & Christine Dimroth
    2015 “Additive Particles in Romance and Germanic Languages.” Linguistik online71(2): 9–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berger, Frauke & Barbara Höhle
    2012 “Restrictions on addition: children’s interpretation of the focus particles auch ‘also’ and nur ‘only’ in German.” Journal of Child Language39: 383–410. doi: 10.1017/S0305000911000122
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000911000122 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergsma, Wenda
    2002 “Children’s interpretations of Dutch sentences with the focus particle alleen (‘only’).” The process of language acquisition: Proceedings of the 1999 GALA Conferenceed. by Inge Lasser , 263–280. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 2006 “(Un)stressed ook in Dutch.” Semantics in acquisitioned. by Veerle van Geenhoven , 29–48. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/1‑4020‑4485‑2_13
    https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4485-2_13 [Google Scholar]
  6. uit den Boogaart, Pieter C.
    1975Woordfrequenties in geschreven en gesproken Nederlands. Utrecht: Oosthoek, Scheltema & Holkema.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Costa, João & Kriszta Szendröi
    2006 “Acquisition of focus marking in European Portuguese – Evidence for a unified approach to focus.” The acquisition of syntax in Romance languagesed. by Vincent Torrens and Linda Escobar , 319–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lald.41.15cos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.41.15cos [Google Scholar]
  8. Hüttner, Thomas , Heiner Drenhaus , Ruben van de Vijver & Jürgen Weissenborn
    2004 “The acquisition of German focus particle auch ‘too’: Comprehension does not always precede production.” Proceedings of the 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development www.bu.edu/bucld/files/2011/05/28-huettner.pdf (26June 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Jordens, Peter
    2012Language Acquisition and the functional category system. Berlin: de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110216219
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110216219 [Google Scholar]
  10. König, Ekkehard
    1991The meaning of focus particles. A comparative perspective. London, New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203212288
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203212288 [Google Scholar]
  11. Krifka, Manfred
    1998 “Additive particles under stress.” Proceedings of SALT8ed. by Devon Strolovitch and Aaron Lawson , 111–129. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Nederstigt, Ulrike
    2003Auch and Noch in child and adult German. Berlin: Mouton de Grutyer. doi: 10.1515/9783110909869
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110909869 [Google Scholar]
  13. R Core Team 2016R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Sæbø, Kjell Johan
    2004 “Conversational contrast and conventional parallel: topic implicatures and additive presuppositions.” Journal of Semantics: An International Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of the Semantics of Natural Language (21)2: 199–127. doi: 10.1093/jos/21.2.199
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/21.2.199 [Google Scholar]
  15. Schmitz, Tijn , Lotte Hogeweg & Helen de Hoop
    . Under review. “Adding the Dutch additive particle ook ‘too’: not to add something but to avoid contrast.” Unpublished ms, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.
  16. Zeevat, Henk
    2009 ““Only” as a mirative particle.” Sprache und Datenverarbeitung1–2(09): 179–196.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/avt.34.10wol
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/avt.34.10wol
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): also , contrastive implicature , L1 acquisition , ook and pragmatics
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error