Formal ontology for discourse analysis of a corpus of court interpreting

References

1. Angelelli, C. V.
   2004 Medical Interpreting and Cross-cultural Communication. Cambridge (NY): CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511486616
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486616 [Google Scholar]
2. Austin, J.
   1962 How to Do Things With Words. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bond, F.; Fellbaum, C.; Hsieh, S.-K.; Huang, C.-R.; Pease, A.; and Vossen, P.
   2014 “A Multilingual Lexico-Semantic Database and Ontology”. InTowards the Multilingual Semantic Web, ed. byP. Buitelaar, and P. Cimiano, 243–258. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cheung, A.
   2012 “The use of reported speech by court interpreters in Hong Kong source”. Interpreting14 (1): 73–91. 10.1075/intp.14.1.04che
   https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.14.1.04che [Google Scholar]
5. Cohen, P.; and Levesque, H.
   1990 “Intention is choice with commitment”. Artificial Intelligence42 (2–3): 213–361. 10.1016/0004‑3702(90)90055‑5
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(90)90055-5 [Google Scholar]
6. de Melo, G.; Suchanek, F.; and Pease, A.
   2008 “Integrating YAGO into the Suggested Upper Merged Ontology”. Proceedings of the 20th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence. 10.1109/ICTAI.2008.34
   https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2008.34 [Google Scholar]
7. Fairclough, N. C. H.
   1995 Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Genesereth, M.
   1991 “Knowledge interchange format”. InProceedings of the Second International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, ed byAllen, J.; Fikes, R.; and Sandewall, E., 238–249. Burlington (MA): Morgan Kaufmann.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Gile, D.
   1999 “Testing the effort models: tightrope hypothesis in simultaneous interpreting: A contribution”. Hermes23: 153–172.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hale, S.
    2004 The Discourse of Court Interpreting: Discourse practices of the law, the witness and the interpreter. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.52
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.52 [Google Scholar]
11. Hertog, E.
    2013 “Legal interpreting”. InThe Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ed. byChapelle, C. A., 3274-3281. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Jacobsen, B.
    2004 “Pragmatic meaning in court interpreting: An empirical study of additions in consecutively interpreted question-answer dialogues”. Hermes32: 237–249.
    [Google Scholar]
13. James F. Allen, C. R. P.
    1980 “Analyzing intention in utterances”. Artificial Intelligence15 (3): 143–178. 10.1016/0004‑3702(80)90042‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(80)90042-9 [Google Scholar]
14. Jurafsky, D.; and Martin, J. H.
    2009 Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Katan, D.
    2004 Translating Cultures: An Introduction for Translators, Interpreters, and Mediators. Manchester: St Jerome Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kaufman, S.
    2006 “The interpreter as intervener”. InThe Negotiator’s Fieldbook: The Desk Reference for the Experienced Negotiator. ed. bySchneider, A. K.; and Honeyman, C., 535–546. Chicago (IL): American Bar Association.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Lee, J.
    2009a “Interpreting inexplicit utterances during courtroom examination”. Applied Linguistics30: 93–114. 10.1093/applin/amn050
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn050 [Google Scholar]
18. Lee, J.
    2009b “When linguistic and cultural differences are not disclosed in court interpreting”. Multilingua28: 379–401. 10.1515/mult.2009.017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2009.017 [Google Scholar]
19. Lee, J.
    2013 “A study of facework in interpreter-mediated courtroom examination”. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology21: 82–99. 10.1080/0907676X.2011.629729
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2011.629729 [Google Scholar]
20. Leung, E.
    2005 “From legislation to translation, from translation to interpretation: The narrative of sexual offences”. cpdb-arts.hkbu.edu.hk
21. Mason, I.; and Ren, W.
    2012 “Power in face-to-face interpreting events”. Translation and Interpreting Studies7 (2): 234–253. 10.1075/tis.7.2.08mas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.7.2.08mas [Google Scholar]
22. Morris, R.
    1995 “The moral dilemmas of court interpreting”. The Translator1 (1): 25–46. 10.1080/13556509.1995.10798948
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.1995.10798948 [Google Scholar]
23. Nakane, I.
    2009 “The myth of an invisible mediator : An Australian case study of English- Japanese police interpreting”. PORTAL Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies6 (1): 1–16. 10.5130/portal.v6i1.825
    https://doi.org/10.5130/portal.v6i1.825 [Google Scholar]
24. Niles, I.; and Pease, A.
    2001 “Toward a Standard Upper Ontology”. InProceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS- 2001), ed. byWelty, C.; and Smith, B., 2–9.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Niles, I.; and Pease, A.
    2003 “Linking Lexicons and Ontologies: Mapping Word Net to the Suggested Upper Merged Ontology”. InProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Information and Knowledge Engineering, 412–416.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Pease, A.
    2009 Standard upper ontology knowledge interchange format. https://github.com/ontologyportal/sigmakee/blob/master/suo-kif.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
27. Pease, A.
    2011 Ontology: A Practical Guide. Articulate Software Press. Angwin (CA): Articulate Software Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Pease, A.; Sutcliffe, G.; Siegel, N.; and Trac, S.
    2010 “Large Theory Reasoning with SUMO at CASC”. AI Communications, Special issue on Practical Aspects of Automated Reasoning23 (2–3): 137–144.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Reddy, M. J.
    1979 “The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language”. Metaphor and thought: 164–201.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Sacks, H.; Schegloff, E. A.; and Jefferson, G.
    1974 “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation”. Language50 (4): 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
31. Schegloff, E.; and Sacks, G. J. H.
    1977 “The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation”. Language53 (2): 361–382. 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
32. Searle, J.
    1969 Speech Acts: an Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge (NY): CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
33. Searle, J.; and Vanderveken, D.
    1985 Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge (NY): CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Sutcliffe, G.; and Suttner, C.
    2006 “The state of CASC”. AI Communications19 (1): 35–48.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Toury, G.
    2012 Descriptive Translation Studies – and beyond: Revised edition, volume100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.100
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.100 [Google Scholar]
36. Yuan, X.
    (ed.) 2013 Managing language and cultural challenges in cross-border negotiation and deal-making. Hoschton (GA): China Media Research.
    [Google Scholar]