Coping with speed

References

1. Adamowicz, Alicja
   1989 “The Role of Anticipation in Discourse: Text Processing in Simultaneous Interpreting”. Polish Psychological Bulletin20 (2): 153–160.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Alonso Bacigalupe, Luis
   1999 “Sobre la doble recepción del mensaje y la preparación del texto: Resultados de un estudio experimental en IS”. InAnovar/Anosar: Estudios de traducción e interpretación, ed. byAlberto Álvarez Lugrís; and Anxo Fernández Ocampo, 11–25. Vigo: Servicio de Publicacións, Universidad de Vigo.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Anderson, Linda
   1994 “Simultaneous Interpretation: Contextual and Translation Aspects”. InBridging the Gap: Empirical Research in Simultaneous Interpretation, ed. bySylvie Lambert; and Barbara Moser-Mercer, 101–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.3.11and
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.3.11and [Google Scholar]
4. Baese-Berk, Melissa M.; and Tuuli H. Morrill
   2015 “Speaking Rate Consistency in Native and non-Native Speakers of English”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America138 (3): 223–228. 10.1121/1.4929622
   https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4929622 [Google Scholar]
5. Barghout, Alma; Lucía Ruiz Rosendo; and Mónica Varela García
   2015 “The Influence of Speed on Omissions in Simultaneous Interpretation. An Experimental Study”. Babel61 (3): 305–334. 10.1075/babel.61.3.01bar
   https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.61.3.01bar [Google Scholar]
6. Barik, Henri C.
   1973 “Simultaneous Interpretation: Temporal and Quantitative Data”. Language and Speech16: 237–270. 10.1177/002383097301600307
   https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097301600307 [Google Scholar]
7. Bevilacqua, Lorenzo
   2009 “The Position of the Verb in Germanic Languages and Simultaneous Interpretation”. The Interpreters’ Newsletter14: 1–31.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Carter-Thomas, Shirley; and Elizabeth Rowley-Jolivet
   2003 “Analysing the Scientific Conference Presentation. A Methodological Overview of a Multimodal Genre”. ASp: La revue du GERAS39/40: 59–72. 10.4000/asp.1295
   https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.1295 [Google Scholar]
9. Chernov, Ghelly V.
   2004 Inference and Anticipation in Simultaneous Interpreting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.57
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.57 [Google Scholar]
10. Christoffels, Ingrid K.; and Annette M. B. De Groot
    2004 “Components of Simultaneous Interpreting: Comparing Interpreting with Shadowing and Paraphrasing”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition7 (3): 227–240. 10.1017/S1366728904001609
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728904001609 [Google Scholar]
11. Christoffels, Ingrid K.
    2004 Cognitive Studies in Simultaneous Interpreting. PhD dissertation. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
12. De Groot, Annette M. B.
    1997 “The Cognitive Study of Translation and Interpretation: Three Approaches”. InCognitive Processes in Translation and Interpreting, ed. byJoseph H. Danks; Gregory M. Shreve; Stephen B. Fountain; and Michael K. McBeath, 25–26. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
13. De Manuel Jerez, Jesús
    2014 “L’usage des discours réels dans la formation d’interprètes: pourquoi, comment et quand?” EVIVA Seminar, Evaluating the Use of Virtual Learning Environments in the Education of Interpreters and their Clients. Welsh Higher Education, Brussels, 28November 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Defrancq, Bart
    2015 “Corpus-based Research into the Presumed Effects of Short EVS”. Interpreting17 (1): 26–45. 10.1075/intp.17.1.02def
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.17.1.02def [Google Scholar]
15. Dejean le Féal, Karla
    1978 Lectures et improvisations: Incidences de la forme de l’énonciation sur la traduction simultanée. PhD dissertation. Paris : Université de la Sorbonne Nouvelle.
16. Díaz Gálaz, Stephanie
    2012 La influencia del conocimiento previo en la interpretación simultánea de discursos especializados: Un estudio empírico. PhD dissertation. Granada: University of Granada.
17. Díaz Gálaz, Stephanie; Presentación Padilla Benítez; and M. Teresa Bajo Molina
    2015 “The Role of Advance Preparation in Simultaneous Interpreting: A Comparison of Professional Interpreters and Interpreting Students”. Interpreting17 (1): 1–25. 10.1075/intp.17.1.01dia
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.17.1.01dia [Google Scholar]
18. Donato, Valentina
    2003 “Strategies Adopted by Student Interpreters in SI: A Comparison Between the English-Italian and the German-Italian Language-pairs”. The Interpreter’s Newsletter12: 101–134.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gerver, David
    1969/2002 “The Effects of Source Language Presentation Rate on the Performance of Simultaneous Conference Interpreters”. InThe Interpreting Studies Reader, ed. byFranz Pöchhacker; and Miriam Schlesinger, 53–66. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Gerver, David
    1976 “Empirical Studies of Simultaneous Interpretation: A Review and a Model”. InTranslation: Applications and Research, ed. byRichard W. Brislin, 165–207. New York: Gardner Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Gile, Daniel
    2009 Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training (Rev. ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.8 [Google Scholar]
22. Goffman, Erving
    1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia (PA): University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Goldman-Eisler, Frieda
    1972 “Segmentation of Input in Simultaneous Interpretation”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research1 (2): 127–140. 10.1007/BF01068102
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068102 [Google Scholar]
24. Hild, Adelina
    2011 “Effects of Linguistic Complexity on Expert Processing during Simultaneous Interpreting”. InMethods and Strategies of Process Research: Integrative Approaches in Translation Studies, ed. byCecilia Alvstad; Adelina Hild; and Elizabeth Tiselius, 249–267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.94.19hil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.94.19hil [Google Scholar]
25. Hild, Adelina
    2014 “The Role of Self-regulatory Processes in the Development of Interpreting Expertise”. Translation and Interpreting Studies9 (1): 128–149. 10.1075/tis.9.1.07hil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.9.1.07hil [Google Scholar]
26. Isham, William P.
    1994 “Memory for Sentence Form after Simultaneous Interpretation: Evidence both for and against Deverbalization”. InBridging the Gap: Experimental Research in Simultaneous Interpretation, ed. bySylvie Lambert; and Barbara Moser-Mercer, 155–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.3.15ish
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.3.15ish [Google Scholar]
27. Lamberger-Felber, Heike
    2001 “Text-Oriented Research into Interpreting”. Hermes, Journal of Linguistics26: 39–64.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Lederer, Marianne
    1981 La traduction simultanée: expérience et théorie. Paris: Minard.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lee, Tae-Hyung
    2002 “Ear Voice Span in English into Korean Simultaneous Interpretation”. Meta47 (4): 596–606. 10.7202/008039ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/008039ar [Google Scholar]
30. Li, Changshuan
    2010 “Coping Strategies for Fast Delivery in Simultaneous Interpretation”. JoSTrans13: 19–25.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Liu, Minhua
    2001 Expertise in Simultaneous Interpreting: A Working Memory Analysis. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Austin (TX): University of Texas at Austin.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Liu, Minhua; Diane L. Schallert; and Patrick J. Carroll
    2004 “Working Memory and Expertise in Simultaneous Interpreting”. Interpreting6 (1): 19–42. 10.1075/intp.6.1.04liu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.6.1.04liu [Google Scholar]
33. MacWhinney, Brian
    1997 “Simultaneous Interpretation and the Competition Model”. InCognitive Processes in Translation and Interpreting, ed. byJoseph H. Danks; Gregory M. Shreve; Stephen B. Fountain; and Michael K. McBeath, 215–232. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Messina, Alessandro
    1998 “The Reading Aloud of English Language Texts in Simultaneously Interpreted Conferences”. Interpreting3 (2): 147–161. 10.1075/intp.3.2.02mes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.3.2.02mes [Google Scholar]
35. Meuleman, Chris; and Fred Van Besien
    2009 “Coping with Extreme Speech Conditions in Simultaneous Interpreting”. Interpreting11 (1): 20–34. 10.1075/intp.11.1.03meu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.11.1.03meu [Google Scholar]
36. Monti, Christina; Claudio Bendazzoli; Annalisa Sandrelli; and Mariachiara Russo
    2005 “Studying Directionality in Simultaneous Interpreting through an Electronic Corpus: EPIC (European Parliament Interpreting Corpus)”. Meta50 (4): np. 10.7202/019850ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/019850ar [Google Scholar]
37. Napier, Jemina
    2004 “Interpreting Omissions. A New Perspective”. Interpreting6 (2): 117–142. 10.1075/intp.6.2.02nap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.6.2.02nap [Google Scholar]
38. Navarro González, Fernando A.
    1997 Traducción y lenguaje en medicina. Barcelona: Fundación Dr. Antonio Esteve.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Oléron, Pierre; and Hubert Nanpon
    1965 “Recherches sur la traduction simultanée”. Journal de psychologie normale et pathologique62: 73–94.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Ono, Takahiro; Hitomi Tohyama; and Shigeki Matsubara
    2008 “Construction and Analysis of Word-Level Time-Aligned Simultaneous Interpretation Corpus”. InProceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, ed. byNicoletta Calzolari; Khalid Choukri; Bente Maegaard; Joseph Mariani; Jan Odijk; Stelios Piperidis; and Daniel Tapias. Paris: ELRA.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Pio, Sonia
    2003 “The Relation between ST Delivery Rate and Quality in Simultaneous Interpretation”. The Interpreters’ Newsletter12: 69–100.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Podhajská, Květa
    2008 “Time Lag in Simultaneous Interpretation from English into Czech and its Dependence on Text Type”. Folia Translatologica10: 87–110.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Pym, Anthony
    2009 “On Omission in Simultaneous Interpreting: Risk Analysis of a Hidden Effort”. InEfforts and Models in Interpreting and Translation Research: A Tribute to Daniel Gile, ed. byGyde Hansen; Andrew Chesterman; and Heidrun Gerzymisch-Arbogast, 83–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.80.08pym
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.80.08pym [Google Scholar]
44. Roach, Peter
    1998 “Some Languages are Spoken More Quickly than Others”. InLanguage Myths, ed. byLaurie Bauer; and Peter Trudgill, 150–158. London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Rodero, Emma
    2012 “A Comparative Analysis of Speech Rate and Perception in Radio Bulletins”. Text and Talk32 (3): 391–411. 10.1515/text‑2012‑0019
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2012-0019 [Google Scholar]
46. Ruiz Rosendo, Lucía
    2009 La interpretación en el ámbito de la medicina. Granada: Comares.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Schweda-Nicholson, Nancy
    1987 “Linguistic and Extralinguistic Aspects of Simultaneous Interpretation”. Applied Linguistics8 (2): 194–205. 10.1093/applin/8.2.194
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/8.2.194 [Google Scholar]
48. Seleskovitch, Danica; and Marianne Lederer
    1984 Interpréter pour traduire. Paris: Didier Érudition.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Seleskovitch, Danica
    1978 Interpreting for International Conferences. Washington D. C.: Pen & Booth.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Setton, Robin; and Andrew Dawrant
    2016 Conference Interpreting. A Complete Course. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.120
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.120 [Google Scholar]
51. Shlesinger, Miriam
    2003 “Effects of Presentation Rate on Working Memory in Simultaneous Interpreting”. The Interpreters’ Newsletter12: 37–49.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Sunnari, Marianna
    1995 “Processing Strategies in Simultaneous Interpreting (SI): “Saying It All” vs. Synthesis”. InTopics in Interpreting Research, ed. byJorma Tommola, 109–121. Turku: University of Turku.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Swales, John M.
    1990 Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Timarová, Sarka; Barbara Dragsted; and Inge G. Hansen
    2011 “Time Lag in Translation and Interpreting. A Methodological Exploration”. InMethods and Strategies of Process Research. Integrative Approaches in Translation Studies, ed. byCecilia Alvstad; Adelina Hild; and Elizabeth Tiselius, 121–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.94.10tim
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.94.10tim [Google Scholar]
55. Tiselius, Elizabeth; and Gard B. Jenset
    2011 “Process and product in simultaneous interpreting: What they tell us about experience and expertise”. InMethods and Strategies of Process Research. Integrative Approaches in Translation Studies, ed. byCecilia Alvstad; Adelina Hild; and Elizabeth Tiselius, 269–300. Amsterdan: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.94.20tis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.94.20tis [Google Scholar]