The gerund challenge

References

1. Academia Română
   Academia Română 2008 Gramatica Limbii Române. Bucureşti: Editura Academiei.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Alexiadou, A.; G. Iordăchioia; F. Schäffer
   2011 ”Scaling the variation in Romance and Germanic nominalizations”. InThe Noun Phrase in Romance and Germanic. Structure, variation, and change, ed. ByPetra Sleeman; and Harry Perridon, 25–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.171.04ale
   https://doi.org/10.1075/la.171.04ale [Google Scholar]
3. Aranberri-Monasterio, N.; S. O‘Brien
   2009 “Evaluating RBMT output for ‑ing forms: A study of four target languages”. Linguistica Antverpiensia8: 105–122.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bednárová-Gibová, K.
   s.a. 2018 Nominalization, translation studies and critical stylistics: A case study of EU-ese in parallel English-Slovak texts. https://www.pulib.sk/web/kniznica/elpub/dokument/Ferencik4/subor/Bednarova_Gibova.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
5. Biber, D.
   1988 Variation across speech and writingCambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
6. Bernth, A.; and Gdaniec, C.
   2001 “Translatability”. Machine Translation16: 175–218. 10.1023/A:1019867030786
   https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019867030786 [Google Scholar]
7. Bowker, L.; and Pearson, J.
   2002 Working with specialized language. A practical guide to using corpora. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203469255
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203469255 [Google Scholar]
8. Dimitriu, C.
   2000 Tratat de gramatica a limbii romane. I Morfologia. Iași: Institutul European
   [Google Scholar]
9. Duffley, P.
   2006 The English Gerund-participle: A Comparison with the Infinitive. Bern: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Gómez-Castejón, Á.
    2012 “Contrastive analysis and translation study from a corpus linguistics Perspective”. International Journal of English Studies IJES12 (2): 111–132. 10.6018/ijes/2012/2/161781
    https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2012/2/161781 [Google Scholar]
11. Huddleston, R.; and Pullum, G.
    2002 The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781316423530
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530 [Google Scholar]
12. Izquierdo, M.
    2008 ”The translaton of ‑ing nominal constructons into Spanish: a corpus-based study”. InActas del III Congreso Internacional de la Asociación Ibérica de Estudios de Traducción e Interpretación. La traducción del futuro: mediación lingüístca y cultural en el siglo XXI, ed. byPegenaute, L.; Decesaris, J.; Tricás, M.; and Bernal, E., 101–112. Barcelona: PPU.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Malá, M.; P. Šaldová
    2015 ”English non-finite participial clauses as seen through their Czech counterparts”. Nordic Journal of English Studies14 (1): 232–257. 10.35360/njes.346
    https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.346 [Google Scholar]
14. Malouf, Robert
    1998 Mixed categories in the hierarchical lexicon. [dissertation] citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.51.3857&rep=rep1&type=pdf
15. Mehl, S.
    1996 “Systematic Alternatives in Lexicalization: The Case of Gerund Translation”. Machine Translation11 (1-2-3): 185–216. 10.1007/BF00349357
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00349357 [Google Scholar]
16. Mehl, S.; Volk, M.
    1999 “Aspects of the translation of English subordinate clauses into German. Problems and Potential of English-to-German MT systems”. Workshop at the8th International Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation, Chester 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Quirk, R.
    1976 A University Grammar of English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Van Landeghem, Jordy
    2015 ‑ing seen through its Dutch Translation Equivalents: A contrastive parallel treebank based study [MA thesis] doi:  10.13140/RG.2.1.4934.1600
    https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4934.1600 [Google Scholar]