1887
Volume 66, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0521-9744
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9668
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Wird Videodolmetschen den Anforderungen eines Gerichtsverfahrens gerecht?, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/babel.00143.dou-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/babel.00143.dou
2020-03-19
2020-08-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Braun, Sabine
    , u.a. 2014 “Assessment of video-mediated interpreting in the criminal justice system. AVIDICUS 2 Research Report”. wp.videoconference-interpreting.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/AVIDICUS2-Research-report.pdf
  2. 2012 “Recommendations for the use of video-mediated interpreting in criminal proceedings”. InVideoconference and remote interpreting in criminal proceedings, ed. byBraun, S.; and J. L. Taylor (eds), 265–287. Guildford: University of Surrey. https://surrey.academia.edu/SabineBraun/
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Doumanidis, Evangelos
    2017 “Warum dolmetschen Sie noch nicht? – Für eine notwendige Verbesserung der Kommunikation während Gerichtsverfahren durch eine Ergänzung der juristischen Ausbildung”. InSprache und Recht, ed. byHoffmann, Roland; Keßler, Norma; Mallon, Denise, 334–344. Berlin: BDÜ Fachverlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. European Commission, Directorate General for Interpretation
    European Commission, Directorate General for Interpretation 2019Interpreting Platforms – Consolidated test results and analysis.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Glunz, Benjamin
    2012Psychologische Effekte beim gerichtlichen Einsatz von Videotechnik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kinnunen, Tuija
    2017 “Körperlich-räumliche Aspekte gedolmetschter Interaktion im Gericht”. trans-kom10: 48–75. www.trans-kom.eu/bd10nr01/trans-kom_10_01_03_Kinnunen_Gericht.20170721.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Luisetto, Martina
    2016 “Visueller Input beim Remote Interpreting”. InDolmetschen 3.0 – Einblicke in einen Beruf im Wandel, ed. byGross-Dinter, Ursula, 51–92. Berlin: Frank & Timme GmbH.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Misener, Gillian
    2019 “The shocking reality of sudden noises”. https://aiic.net/page/8811/the-shocking-reality-of-sudden-noises/lang/1
  9. Moser, Barbara
    2002 “Situation Models: The Cognitive Relation Between Interpreter, Speaker and Audience”. InIdentité, altérité, équivalence? La traduction comme relation, ed. byIsrael, F., 163–187. Paris: Lettres Modernes Minard.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Mouzourakis, Panayiotis
    2003 “That feeling of being there: Vision and presence in remote interpreting”. https://aiic.net/page/1173/that-feeling-of-being-there-vision-and-presence-in-remote-interpreting/lang/1
  11. Rotterdam, Peter von; Van den Hoogen, Ronald
    2011 “True-to-life requirements for using videoconferencing in legal proceedings”. InVideoconference and remote interpreting in criminal proceedings, ed. byBraun, Sabine; and Taylor, Judith, 187–197. Guilford: University of Surrey.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Seubert, Sabine
    2019Visuelle Informationen beim Simultandolmetschen. Berlin: Frank & Timme GmbH.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/babel.00143.dou
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error