Translation quality gained through the implementation of the iso en 17100:2015 and the usage of the blockchain

References

1. Abuhav, Itay
   2017 iso 9001:2015 – A Complete Guide to Quality Management Systems. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 10.4324/9781315369808
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315369808 [Google Scholar]
2. Allen, Jeff
   2015 “Translation Standards: Which One?” Tradumàtica: tecnologies de la traducció13 [special issue: Normalització en la indústria de la traducció]: 545–551. 10.5565/rev/tradumatica.85
   https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/tradumatica.85 [Google Scholar]
3. Al-Qinai, Jamal
   2000 “Translation Quality Assessment. Strategies, Parametres and Procedures”. Meta: Translators’ Journal45 (3): 497–519. 10.7202/001878ar
   https://doi.org/10.7202/001878ar [Google Scholar]
4. Asimov, Isaac
   1983 “Asimov’s New World”. The Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2018/12/27/35-years-ago-isaac-asimov-was-asked-by-the-star-to-predict-the-world-of-2019-here-is-what-he-wrote.html
   [Google Scholar]
5. Barros, María
   2017 “iso Standards and Working Processes at the United Nations Language Services: A Comparison”. https://hr.un.org/sites/hr.un.org/files/editors/u439/ISO%20standards%20and%20working%20processes.pdf
6. Bower, Joseph L.; and Clayton M. Christensen
   1995 “Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave”. Harvard Business Review73 (1): 43–53.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cáceres Würsig, Ingrid
   2004 “Breve historia de la secretaría de interpretación de lenguas”. Meta: Translators’ Journal49 (3): 609–628. 10.7202/009381ar
   https://doi.org/10.7202/009381ar [Google Scholar]
8. Casey, Michael J.; and Paul Vigna
   2018 The Truth Machine – Blockchain and the Future of Everything. New York: St. Martin’s Press [ebook].
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cayron, Samantha
   2017 Manual de traducción jurada de documentos notariales en materia de sucesiones entre los sistemas jurídicos francés y español. Granada: Comares.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Colina, Sonia
    2008 “Translation Quality Evaluation”. The Translator14 (1): 97–134. 10.1080/13556509.2008.10799251
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2008.10799251 [Google Scholar]
11. Chiocchetti, Elena;
    2017 “Quality Assurance in Multilingual Legal Terminological Databases”. The Journal of Specialised Translation27: 164–188.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dale, Lewis
    2017 “Translation and Blockchain Technology”. ldgermantranslation.com/en/2017/06/11/translation-and-blockchain/
13. Declercq, Christophe
    2014 “Crowd, Cloud and Automation in the Translation Education Community”. Cultus, the Journal of Intercultural Mediation and Communication7: 37–56. www.cultusjournal.com/index.php/archive/16-issue-2014-v-7-transcreation-and-the-professions
    [Google Scholar]
14. Drugan, Joanna
    2013 Quality in Professional Translation: Assessment and Improvement. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Duro Moreno, Miguel
    2008 “La traducción jurada: propuesta de normalización estilística aplicada a (inglés español/español-inglés y francés-español/español francés)”. InLa traducción e interpretación jurídicas en la Unión Europea: retos para la Europa de los ciudadanos, ed. byEmilio Ortega Arjonilla, 675–706. Granada: Comares.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Duro Moreno, Miguel
    2012 “Entornos y determinación de la traducción jurídica inglés>español”. InEugenio Coseriu (1921–2002) en los comienzos del siglo xxi, vol.ii, ed. byJesús Martínez del Castillo, 301–327 [Analecta malacitana, annex lxxxvi].
    [Google Scholar]
17. Duro Moreno, Miguel
    2019 “Digital, dinámica, segura, ecológica y sin papeles:propuesta actualizada de normalización de la traducción jurada en España para elaseguramiento de la calidad”. InIntroducción a la traducción jurídica y jurada, 3rd ed., ed.byAna Belén Martínez López; Miguel Duro Moreno; and Pedro San Ginés Aguilar, 212-233. Granada: Comares.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Etches, Robert; and Michael J. Casey
    2019 “What Does Blockchain Have to Do with Localization?” https://www.nimdzi.com/podcast-what-does-blockchain-have-to-do-with-localizaton/
19. European Committee for Standardization
    European Committee for Standardization 2015 en 1700:2015 Translation Services – Requirements for translation services. Brussels: cen.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Gallego Hernández, Daniel
    2008 “Pautas para una optimización del proceso de traducción de documentos bajo juramento: explotación de recursos informáticos”. InActas del iii Congreso Internacional de la Asociación Ibérica de Estudios de Traducción e Interpretación. La traducción del futuro: mediación lingüística y cultural en el siglo xxi. Barcelona, 22–24 de marzo del 2007, vol.2, ed. byLuis Pegenaute; , 309–320. Barcelona: ppu.
    [Google Scholar]
21. García-Medall, Joaquín
    1998 “Informe sobre la traducción e interpretación juradas”. InLa traducción: de la teoría a la práctica, ed. byAntonio Bueno García; and Joaquín García Medall, 61–80. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.
    [Google Scholar]
22. González Corcho, Ana
    2018 “Sistema de calidad para traductores: por la parte que te toca”. La linterna del traductor17: 12–20. www.lalinternadeltraductor.org/n17/control-calidad-traductores.html
    [Google Scholar]
23. Gouadec, Daniel
    2010 “Quality in Translation”. InHandbook of Translation Studies, vol.1, ed. byYves Gambier; and Luc van Doorslaer, 270–275. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hts.1.qua1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hts.1.qua1 [Google Scholar]
24. Hall, Joseph
    2018 “Isaac Asimov, You Were no Nostradamus”. https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2018/12/27/isaac-asimov-you-were-no-nostradamus.html
25. Hatim, Basil; and Ian Mason
    1990 Discourse and the Translator. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
26. House, Juliane
    2009 “Quality”. InRoutledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, 2nd ed., ed. byMona Baker; and Gabriela Saldanha, 222–225. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
27. House, Juliane
    2015 Translation Quality Assessment: Past and Present. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Hurley, Rachel
    2018 “How Blockchain Will Impact Translation”. https://www.languageinsight.com/blog/2018/how-blockchain-will-impact-translation-2/
29. Iansiti, Marco; and Karim R. Lakhani
    2017 “The Truth about Blockchain”. Harvard Business Review95 (1): 118–127.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Ibáñez Jiménez, Javier W.
    2016 “Blockchain, ¿el nuevo notario?”. Everis ntt Data. https://repositorio.comillas.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11531/14564/Blockchain_el_nuevo_notario.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
    [Google Scholar]
31. Ibáñez Jiménez, Javier W.
    2017 “Cuestiones jurídicas en torno a la cadena de bloques («blockchain») y a los contratos inteligentes («smart contracts»)”. Icade: revista de las facultades de Derecho y Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales101. revistas.upcomillas.es/index.php/revistaicade/article/view/8407/8413
    [Google Scholar]
32. International Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission
    International Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission 2004 Standardization and related activities – Fundamentals and Vocabulary, 8th ed.Geneva: iso/iec.
    [Google Scholar]
33. International Organization for Standardization
    International Organization for Standardization 2015 Quality Management Systems – General vocabulary, 4th ed.Geneva: iso.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Joscelyne, Andrew
    2018 “Blockchain: When the Token Economy Meets the Translation Industry”. https://blog.taus.net/blockchain-when-the-token-economy-meets-the-translation-industry
35. Johnson, Melvin
    2017 “Google’s Multilingual Neural Machine Translation System: Enabling Zero-Shot Translation”. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics5 (1): 339–351. 10.1162/tacl_a_00065
    https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00065 [Google Scholar]
36. Koźbiał, Dariusz
    2017 “Two-Tiered Approach to Quality Assurance in Legal Translation at the Court of Justice of the European Union”. InQuality Aspects in Institutional Translation, ed. byTomáš Svoboda; Łucja Biel; and Krzysztof Łoboda, 155–174. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Krüger, Ralph
    2016 “Contextualising Computer-Assisted Translation Tools and Modelling Their Usability”. trans-kom9 (1): 114–148. www.trans-kom.eu/bd09nr01/trans-kom_09_01_08_Krueger_CAT.20160705.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
38. Lara Aguado, Ángeles
    2016 “La reforma de la traducción e interpretación oficial en derecho internacional privado español”. Revista electrónica de estudios internacionales32: 1–36. www.reei.org/index.php/revista/num32/articulos/reforma-traduccion-interpretacion-oficial-derecho-internacional-privado-espanol
    [Google Scholar]
39. Lauscher, Susanne
    2000 “Translation Quality Assessment”. The Translator6 (2): 149–168. 10.1080/13556509.2000.10799063
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2000.10799063 [Google Scholar]
40. Lingua Technologies International
    Lingua Technologies International 2017 “Difference between iso 17100 and en 15038”. https://www.translationsingapore.com/difference-between-iso-17100-and-en-15038/
41. Lobato Patricio; Julia and Adrián Granados Navarro
    2019 “Estado de la cuestión sobre las referencias documentales de la traducción e interpretación juradas”. InIntroducción a la traducción jurídica y jurada: orientaciones doctrinales y metodológicas, 3rd ed., ed.byAna Belén Martínez López, Miguel Duro Moreno; and Pedro San Ginés Aguilar, 262-279. Granada: Comares.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Márquez Villegas, Luis
    1997 “Orientaciones metodológicas para la certificación y legalización de traducciones juradas”. InIntroducción a la traducción jurídica y jurada, 2nd ed., ed. byEmilio Ortega Arjonilla; and Pedro San Ginés Aguilar, 115–121. Granada: Comares.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Mayoral Asensio, Roberto
    2003 Translating Official Documents. Manchester: St. Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Mitchell-Schuitevoerder, Rosemary
    2015 “A Reconsideration of Translation Quality and Standards”. Journal of Siberian Federal University – Humanities & Social Sciences12 (8): 2908–2919.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Mossop, Brian
    2014 Revising and Editing for Translators, 3rd ed. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315767130
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315767130 [Google Scholar]
46. Muzii, Luigi
    2018 “Sink or Swim”. www.s-quid.it/en/sink-swim/#blockchain
47. Muzii, Luigi
    2019 “Scuds and Flies”. www.s-quid.it/en/scud/
48. Norman, Alan T.
    2017 Blockchain Technology Explained: The Ultimate Beginner’s Guide about Blockchain Wallet, Mining, Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Zcash, Monero, Ripple, Dash, Iota and Smart Contracts. Los Angeles: Createspace [ebook].
    [Google Scholar]
49. O’Brien, Sharon
    2012 “Towards a Dynamic Quality Evaluation Model for Translation”. The Journal of Specialised Translation17: 55–77.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Parra-Galiano, Silvia
    2017 “Conceptos teóricos fundamentales en la revisión de traducciones y su reflejo en el Manual de revisión de la dgt y en las normas iso 17100:2015 y en 15038:2006”. Hermēneus. Revista de traducción e interpretación19: 270–308. 10.24197/her.19.2017.270‑308
    https://doi.org/10.24197/her.19.2017.270-308 [Google Scholar]
51. Peñarroja Fa, Josep
    2004 “Historia de los intérpretes jurados”. La linterna del traductor9: 21–34. https://bscw.rediris.es/pub/bscw.cgi/4842883?op=preview&back_url=4842491 and atijc.com/es/historia.htm
    [Google Scholar]
52. Prieto Ramos, Fernando
    2015 “Quality Assurance in Legal Translation: Evaluating Process, Competence and Product in the Pursuit of Adequacy”. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law/Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique28 (1): 11–30. 10.1007/s11196‑014‑9390‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-014-9390-9 [Google Scholar]
53. Popiołek, Monika
    2016 “iso Standards Framework for qa in Legal Translation”. translatingeurope.blog.ils.uw.edu.pl/files/2016/06/ISO-Standards-Framework-for-QA-in-Legal-Translation.pdf
54. Reback, Gedalyah
    2018 “Blockchain would Be a Useful Way to Streamline Translation”. https://medium.com/orbs-network/blockchain-would-be-a-useful-way-to-streamline-translation-technology-ab6a66e22c79
55. Shoshan, Ofer
    2018 “Using Blockchain to Track a Translation to the Actual Linguists”. https://slator.com/sponsored-content/using-blockchain-to-track-a-translation-to-the-actual-linguists/
56. Transperfect
    Transperfect 2017 “Learning About Quality: What’s the Difference Between qa & qc?” https://www.transperfect.com/blog/translation-quality-assurance-vs-quality-control
57. Ugray, Gábor L.
    2018 “Blockchain as Translation’s New Foundational Technology”. https://jealousmarkup.xyz/texts/blockchain-translation-foundational-technology/
58. Weber, Ingo
    2016 “Untrusted Business Process Monitoring and Execution Using Blockchain”. InBusiness Process Management. 14th International Conference, BPM 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, September 18–22, 2016. Proceedings, ed. byMarcello La Rosa; Peter Loos; and Oscar Pastor, 329–347. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑45348‑4_19
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45348-4_19 [Google Scholar]
59. Williams, Malcolm
    2004 Translation Quality Assessment: An Argumentation-Centred Approach. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
    [Google Scholar]