Las metafunciones de Halliday en traducción

References

1. Aghagolzadeh, Ferdows; y Faezeh Farazandeh-pour
   2012 “The Analysis of English- Persian Legal Translations Based on Systemic Functional Grammar Approach (SFG)”. Theory and Practice in Language Studies2 (1): 126–131. 10.4304/tpls.2.1.126‑131
   https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.1.126-131 [Google Scholar]
2. Eggins, Suzanne
   2002 Introducción a la lingüística sistémica. Logroño: Universidad de la Rioja.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Espindola, Elaine
   2012 “Systemic Functional Linguistics and Audiovisual Translation Studies: A Conceptual Basis for the Study of the Language of Subtitles”. D.E.L.T.A.28 (especial): 495–513.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Halliday, Michael
   1982 El lenguaje como semiótica social: la interpretación social del lenguaje y del significado. Trad. porJorge Ferreiro Santana. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Halliday, Michael
   1992 “Language Theory and Translation Practice”. Rivista internazionale di tecnica della traduzione0: 15–25.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Halliday, Michael; y Ruqaiya Hasan
   1976 Cohesion in English. Londres: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Halliday, Michael A. K.; and Hasan, Ruqaiya
   1985 Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Halliday, Michael; y Christian Matthiessen
   2004 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Nueva York: Hodder Arnold.
   [Google Scholar]
9. House, Juliane
   2014 Translation Quality Assessment: Past and Present. Londres: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315752839
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315752839 [Google Scholar]
10. Manfredi, Marina
    2008 Translating Text and Context: Translation Studies and Systemic Functional Linguistics. Vol.1. Bolonia: D. U. Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Matthiessen, Christian
    2001 “The Environments of Translation”. EnExploring Translation and Multilingual Text Production: Beyond Content, ed. porErich Steiner; y Colin Yallop, 277–305. Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110866193.41
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110866193.41 [Google Scholar]
12. McLaughlin, Harry
    1969 “SMOG Grading – a New Readability Formula”. Journal of Reading12 (8): 639–646.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Munday, Jeremy
    1998 “Problems of Applying Thematic Analysis to Translation between Spanish and English”. Cadernos de tradução1 (3): 183–213.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ricoeur, Paul
    2003 Sur la traduction. París: Bayard.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Rosa, Rusdi Noor; T. Silvana Sinar; Zubaidah Ibrahim-Bell; y Eddy Setia
    2017 “Metafunctional Shifts in the Translation of Student and Professional Translators”. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied research (IJSBAR)35 (2): 85–101.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Saridakis, Ioannis
    2012 Η Παρεμβολή και η Τυποποίηση στη Μετάφραση Ειδικών Επιστημονικών Κειμένων: Προς ένα Πιθανολογικό-Ερμηνευτικό Μοντέλο της Μεταφραστικής Επιτέλεσης στα Ειδικά Κείμενα [La interferencia y la estandarización en la traducción de textos especializados: hacia un modelo probabilístico-hermenéutico del proceso traductivo en textos especializados]. EnSelected Papers of the 10th International Conference of Greek Linguistics, ed. porZoe Gavriilidou; Angeliki Efthymiou; Evangelia Thomadaki; y Penelope Kambakis-Vougiouklis, 1110–1127. Komotini: Democritus University of Thrace.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Taylor, Chris; y Anthony Baldry
    2001 “Computer Assisted Text Analysis and Translation: A Functional Approach in the Analysis and Translation of Advertising texts”. EnExploring Translation and Multilingual Text Production: Beyond Content, ed. porErich Steiner; y Colin Yallop, 277–305. Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110866193.277
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110866193.277 [Google Scholar]
18. Teich, Elke
    2001 “Towards a Model for the Description of Cross-linguistic Divergence and Commonality in Translation”. EnExploring Translation and Multilingual Text Production: Beyond Content, ed. porErich Steiner; y Colin Yallop, 191–227. Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110866193.191
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110866193.191 [Google Scholar]