How interpreter-translators are assessed and hired in the market

References

1. Akbari, A. ; and Segers, W.
   2017 “Translation Evaluation Methods and the End-Product: Which One Paves the Way for a More Reliable and Objective Assessment?” SKASE Journal of translation and interpretation11 (1): 2–24.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Akbari, A.
   2018 “Translation Quality Research: A data-driven collection of peer-reviewed journal articles during 2000–2017”. Babel, 64 (4): 548–578. 10.1075/babel.00051.akb
   https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00051.akb [Google Scholar]
3. Angelelli, C.
   2013 “Forword”. InAssessment Issues in Language Translation and Interpreting, ed. by Dina Tsagari ; and Roelof van Deemter , 9–11. Bern: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bachman, L. ; and Palmer, A.
   1996 Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: OUP.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Campbell, S. ; and Hale, S.
   2003 “Translation and Interpreting Assessment in the Context of Educational Measurement”. InTranslation Today: Trends and Perspectives, ed. by G. Anderman ; and M. Rogers . 205–224. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853596179‑017
   https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853596179-017 [Google Scholar]
6. Carroll, J. B.
   1966 “An experiment in evaluating the quality of translations”. Mechanical Translation9: 55–56.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Fulcher, G.
   2003 Testing Second Language Speaking. Edinburgh Gate: Pearson Education Ltd.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Gale, N. K. ; Heath, G. ; Cameron, E. ; Rashid, S. ; and Redwood, S.
   2013 “Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research”. BMC medical research methodology13–117. doi:  10.1186/1471‑2288‑13‑117
   https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-117 [Google Scholar]
9. Kim, Y.
   2008 “Assessment System in Graduate School of Translation and Interpretation”. Journal of Interpretation and Translation Education6 (2): 23–36.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Kim, J.
    2016 “Quality Assessment of Consecutive Interpretation: An Example from Korean-Chinese Interpretation”. Interpreting and Translation Studies20 (1): 25–47.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Krajcsco, Z.
    2018 “Translators’ competence profiles versus market demand”. Babel64 (5): 692–709. 10.1075/babel.00059.kra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00059.kra [Google Scholar]
12. Lui, M. ; Chang, C. ; and Wu, S.
    2008 “Interpretation Evaluation Practices: Comparison of Eleven Schools in Taiwan, China, Britain, and the USA”. Compilation and Translation Review1 (1): 1–42.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Liu, M.
    2013 “Design and Analysis of Taiwan’s Interpretation Certification Examination”. InAssessment Issues in Language Translation and Interpreting, ed. by Dina Tsagari ; and Roelof van Deemter : 15–33. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Messick, S.
    1989 “Validity”. InEducational Measurement (3rd ed.), ed. by R. L. Linn . 13–104. American Council on Education, Washington (WA): Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Park, H.
    2015 “Quality Assessment in Korean Military Interpreting: Focusing on the Assessment of Interpreting Officers”. Interpreting and Translation Studies19 (2): 160–181.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Pyoun, H.
    2004 “A case study on the evaluation of AB interpretation according to different teacher profiles”. Conference Interpretation and Translation6 (2): 207–224.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Salmi, L. ; and Penttila, A.
    2013 “The System of Authorizing Translators in Finland”. InAssessment Issues in Language Translation and Interpreting, ed. by Dina Tsagari ; and Roelof van Deemter , 15–33. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Srivastava, A. ; and Thomson, B.
    2009 “Framework Analysis: A Qualitative Methodology for Applied Research Note Policy Research”. JOAAG4 (2): 72–79.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Wu, F.
    2013 “How Do We Assess Students in the Interpreting Examinations?” InAssessment Issues in Language Translation and Interpreting, ed. by Dina Tsagari ; and Roelof van Deemter , 15–33. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]