Ethical issues for literary translation in the Era of artificial intelligence

References

1. Aranal, Lyshiel
   2021 “‘He Works, She Cooks’: Google Translate Results Reveal Gender Bias in Tech.” InqPOP!, 11 March 2021. Accessed1 December 2021. https://pop.inquirer.net/107105/google-translate-gender-bias
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baker, Mona, and Carol Maier
   2011 “Ethics in Interpreter and Translator Training.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer5 (1): 1–14. 10.1080/13556509.2011.10798809
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2011.10798809 [Google Scholar]
3. Bostrom, Nick, and Eliezer Yudkowsky
   2014 “The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence.” InThe Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, edited byKeith Frankish and William M. Ramsey, 316–334. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139046855.020
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139046855.020 [Google Scholar]
4. Bowker, Lynn
   2021 “Translation Technologies and Ethics.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Translation and Ethics, edited byKaisa Koskinen and Nike K. Pokorn, 262–278. New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Castilho, Sheila, and Natália Resende
   2022 “Post-editese in Literary Translations.” Information13 (66):1–22. 10.3390/info13020066
   https://doi.org/10.3390/info13020066 [Google Scholar]
6. Chan, Sin-wai
   2018 The Human Factor in Machine Translation. London: Taylor and Francis.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Dignum, Virginia
   2018 “Ethics in Artificial Intelligence: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Ethics and Information Technology20 (1): 1–3. 10.1007/s10676‑018‑9450‑z
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9450-z [Google Scholar]
8. Drugan, Joanna, and Chris Megone
   2011 “Bringing Ethics into Translator Training: An Integrated, Inter-disciplinary Approach.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer5 (1): 189–211. 10.1080/13556509.2011.10798817
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2011.10798817 [Google Scholar]
9. Drugan, Joanna
   2019 “Ethics.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Translation and Philosophy, eds. byPiers Rawlingm and Philip Wilson, 243–255. Abingdon; New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Feng, Quangong 冯全功
    2012 “Cong shiti dao guanxi: fanyi yanjiu de jianxing tanxi” 从实体到关系——翻译研究的间性探析 [From entity to relation – Exploration of “interness” in translation studies]. Dangdai waiyu yanjiu当代外语研究 [Contemporary foreign languages studies] 12 (1): 48–52.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Flynn, Sean, Christopher Geiger, Joao Quintais, Thomas Margoni, Mathew Sag, Lucie Guibault and Michael W. Carroll
    2020 “Implementing User Rights for Research in the Field of Artificial Intelligence: A Call for International Action.” European Intellectual Property Review42 (7): 393–398. 10.2139/ssrn.3578819
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3578819 [Google Scholar]
12. Garcia, Ignacio
    2011 “Translating by Post-editing: Is It the Way Forward?” Machine Translation25 (3): 217–237. 10.1007/s10590‑011‑9115‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10590-011-9115-8 [Google Scholar]
13. Gouadec, Daniel
    2007 Translation as a Profession. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/btl.73
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.73 [Google Scholar]
14. Guerberof-Arenas, Ana, and Antonio Toral
    2020 The Impact of Post-Editing and Machine Translation on Creativity and Reading Experience. Translation Spaces. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/ts.20035.gue
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.20035.gue [Google Scholar]
15. Kaisa Koskinen, and Nike K. Pokorn
    eds. 2021 The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Ethics. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kenny, Dorothy, and Stephen Doherty
    2014 “Statistical Machine Translation in the Translation Curriculum: Overcoming Obstacles and Empowering Translators.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer8 (2): 276–294. 10.1080/1750399X.2014.936112
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2014.936112 [Google Scholar]
17. Kenny, Dorothy
    2011 “The Ethics of Machine Translation.” InProceedings of the XI NZSTI National Conference, edited bySybille Ferner, 121–131. Auckland: NZSTI.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kenny, Dorothy
    2019 “Machine Translation.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Translation and Philosophy, edited byPiers Rawling and Philip Wilson, 428–445. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Kenny, Dorothy
    2020 “Technology and Translator Training.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Translation and Technology, edited byMinako O’Hagan, 498–515. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lee, Hyang, and Yun Seong Woo
    2020 “How Can We Improve the Codes of Ethics for Translators?” Babel66 (4–5): 706–718. 10.1075/babel.00190.yun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00190.yun [Google Scholar]
21. Lee, Tong King
    2011 “The Death of the Translator in Machine Translation: A Bilingual Poetry Project.” Target: International Journal of Translation Studies23 (1): 92–112. 10.1075/target.23.1.06lee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.23.1.06lee [Google Scholar]
22. Lee, Tong King
    2020 “Translation and Copyright: Towards a Distributed View of Originality and Authorship.” The Translator26 (3): 241–256. 10.1080/13556509.2020.1836770
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2020.1836770 [Google Scholar]
23. Loeb and Loeb LLP
    Loeb and Loeb LLP 2018 “Naruto v. Slater.” Lexology, 23 April 2018. Accessed1 December 2021. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=6c52581e-d82f-4bb7-802c-191db44dca9f
    [Google Scholar]
24. Maouche, Seraya
    2019 “Google AI: Opportunities, Risks, and Ethical Challenges.” Contemporary French and Francophone Studies23 (4): 447–455. 10.1080/17409292.2019.1705012
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17409292.2019.1705012 [Google Scholar]
25. McDonough Dolmaya, Julie
    2011 “Moral Ambiguity: Some Shortcomings of Professional Codes of Ethics for Translators.” JosTrans: The Journal of Specialised Translation151: 28–49.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Moorkens, Joss, Antonio Toral, Sheila Castilho, and Andy Way
    2018 “Translators’ Perceptions of Literary Post-editing Using Statistical and Neural Machine Translation.” Translation Spaces7(2): 240–262. 10.1075/ts.18014.moo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.18014.moo [Google Scholar]
27. Poibeau, Thierry
    2017 Machine Translation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/11043.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11043.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
28. Ragni, Valentina, and Lucas Nunes Vieira
    2022 “What Has Changed with Neural Machine Translation? A Critical Review of Human Factors.” Perspectives30 (1):137–158. 10.1080/0907676X.2021.1889005
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2021.1889005 [Google Scholar]
29. Shoshan, Ofer
    2018 “Neural MT and Blockchain Are about to Radically Transform the Translation Market.” Slator, 21 May 2018, Accessed16 January 2022. https://slator.com/neural-mt-and-blockchain-are-about-to-radically-transform-the-translation-market/
    [Google Scholar]
30. Stupiello, Érika Nogueira de Andrade
    2008 “Ethical Implications of Translation Technologies.” Translation Journal12 (1). Available at: translationjournal.net/journal/43ethics.htm
    [Google Scholar]
31. TAC (Translators Association of China)
    TAC (Translators Association of China) 2019 Code of Professional Ethics for Translators and Interpreters (ZYF 012–2019). Beijing: Standards Press of China.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Taivalkoski-Shilov, Kristiina
    2019 “Ethical Issues Regarding Machine (-assisted) Translation of Literary Texts.” Perspectives27 (5): 689–703. 10.1080/0907676X.2018.1520907
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2018.1520907 [Google Scholar]
33. Toral, Antonio, and Andy Way
    2018 “What Level of Quality Can Neural Machine Translation Attain on Literary Text?” InTranslation Quality Assessment: From Principles to Practice, edited byJoss Moorkens, Sheila Castilho, Federico Gaspari, and Stephen Doherty, 263–287. Switzerland: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑91241‑7_12
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91241-7_12 [Google Scholar]
34. Toral, Antonio, Sheila Castilho, Ke Hu, and Andy Way
    2018 “Attaining the Unattainable? Reassessing Claims of Human Parity in Neural Machine Translation.” InProceedings of the Third Conference on Machine Translation: Research Papers, 113–123, Brussels, Belgium: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.10432.pdf10.18653/v1/W18‑6312
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-6312 [Google Scholar]
35. Wu, You
    2021 “Revisiting Translation in the Age of Digital Globalization.” Babel67 (6): 819–844. 10.1075/babel.00248.wu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00248.wu [Google Scholar]
36. Yanisky-Ravid, Shlomit, and Xiaoqiong (Jackie) Liu
    2018 “When Artificial Intelligence Systems Produce Inventions: The 3A Era and an Alternative Model for Patent Law.” Cardozo Law Review391: 2215–2262
    [Google Scholar]
37. Yanisky-Ravid, Shlomit, and Cynthia Martens
    2019 “From the Myth of Babel to Google Translate: Confronting Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence – Copyright and Algorithmic Biases in Online Translation Systems.” Seattle University Law Review43 (1): 99–168. 10.2139/ssrn.3345716
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3345716 [Google Scholar]
38. Yanisky-Ravid, Shlomit, and Sean K. Hallisey
    2019 “Equality and Privacy by Design: A New Model of Artificial Intelligence Data Transparency via Auditing, Certification, and Safe Harbor Regimes.” Fordham Urban Law Journal, 461:428–486.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Zhang, Yongzhong 张永中
    2014 “Bianyi: zhuti jianxing de shiyu ronghe” 变译：主体间性的视域融合 [Translation variation: Horizon fusion of inter-subjectivity]. Waiyu xuekan外语学刊 [Foreign language research] (1): 89–93.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Zheng, Jianwei 郑剑委
    2018 “Zhongguo wangluo wenxue de haiwai jieshou yu wangluo fanyi moshi” 中国网络文学的海外接受与网络翻译模式 [A Study on the overseas reception and internet translation mode of Chinese internet literature]. Huawen wenxue华文文学 [Literatures in Chinese] (5): 119–125.
    [Google Scholar]