Review of Monzó-Nebot & Lomeña-Galiano (2024): Critical Approaches to Institutional Translation and Interpreting: Challenging Epistemologies

References

1. Gile, Daniel
   1994 “Opening up in Interpretation Studies.” InTranslation Studies. An Interdiscipline, edited byMary Snell-Hornby, Franz Pöchhacker, and Klaus Kaindl, 149–158. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/btl.2.20gil
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.2.20gil [Google Scholar]
2. Grosfoguel, Ramón
   2011 “Decolonizing Post-Colonial Studies and Paradigms of Political-Economy: Transmodernity, Decolonial Thinking, and Global Coloniality.” Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World1 (1): 1–36. 10.5070/T411000004
   https://doi.org/10.5070/T411000004 [Google Scholar]
3. Hooks, Bell
   1984 Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Boston: South End Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Monzó-Nebot, Esther, and María Lomeña-Galiano
   eds. 2024 Toward Inclusion and Social Justice in Institutional Translation and Interpreting. Revealing Hidden Practices of Exclusion. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003349914
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003349914 [Google Scholar]
5. Smith, Linda Tuhiwai
   2007 Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Spivak, Gayatri C.
   1988 “Can the Subaltern Speak?” InMarxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited byCary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg, 271–313. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
   [Google Scholar]