1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Belgian Journal of Linguistics
  4. Volume 31, Issue 1
  5. Article
Current trends in analyzing syntactic variation
  • ISSN 0774-5141
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9676
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

In this paper, I examine whether the variation patterns of pluralization (e.g., ‘there was/were parties’) in Peninsular Spanish corroborate the hypothesis elaborated in earlier work that the phenomenon constitutes a competition between two variants of the presentational construction with that is constrained by domain-general cognitive constraints on spreading activation. In addition, this paper examines whether pluralization is incrementing in frequency in particular Peninsular regions and whether or not the phenomenon is spreading geographically. To meet these objectives, I analyze a dataset of more than 7,500 cases of  + plural NP, which were culled from two publicly available data sources: the (which represents only rural speakers born before the 1940s; Fernández-Ordóñez 2005- ) and (which represents mainly young and middle-aged speakers). The results of a mixed-effects logistic regression analysis that tests the effects of tense, the absence/presence of negation, typical action-chain position of the noun, the regional origin of the examples, and the data sources support the competition hypothesis. This model also supports that pluralized is spreading westward from its epicenters (Valencia, Barcelona, and Murcia), while also incrementing in frequency in northern, eastern and southern Spain. However, its frequency appears to be declining in central Spain. A geographically more detailed, but similar picture is obtained with three generalized additive mixed models that test the effects of geography on the total dataset as well as on each of the two subcorpora.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00002.cla
2018-04-23
2023-04-01

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00002.cla
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bartón, Kamil
    2016 “MuMIn: Model Selection and Model Averaging Based on Information Criteria (AICc and alike).” AccessedMay 2016. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn/index.html.
  2. Bates, Douglas , Martin Maechler , Ben Bolker , and Steven Walker
    2016 “lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models using ‘Eigen’ and S4.” AccessedMay 2016. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html.
  3. Bentivoglio, Paola , and Mercedes Sedano
    2011 “Morphosyntactic Variation in Spanish-Speaking Latin America.” InThe handbook of Hispanic Sociolinguistics, ed. by Manuel Díaz-Campos , 123–147. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781444393446.ch8
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444393446.ch8 [Google Scholar]
  4. Blas-Arroyo, José-Luis
    1995 “A Propósito de un Caso de Convergencia Gramatical por Causación Múltiple en el Área de Influencia Lingüística Catalana. Análisis Sociolingüístico.” Cuadernos de Investigación Filológica21–22: 175–200.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. 2016 “Entre la Estabilidad y la Hipercorrección en un Antiguo ‘Cambio desde Abajo’: Haber Existencial en las Comunidades de Habla Castellonenses.” Lingüística Española Actual6 (1): 69–108.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Burnham, Kenneth P. , and David R. Anderson
    2002 Model Selection and Multimodel Inference. New York, NY: Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bybee, Joan
    2001 Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511612886
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612886 [Google Scholar]
  8. Claes, Jeroen
    2014a “A Cognitive Construction Grammar Approach to the Pluralization of Presentational Haber in Puerto Rican Spanish.” Language Variation and Change26 (2): 219–246. doi: 10.1017/S0954394514000052
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394514000052 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2014b “La pluralización de Haber Presentacional y su distribución social en el español de La Habana, Cuba: Un acercamiento desde la Gramática de Construcciones.” Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana23: 165–187.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. 2014c “Sociolingüística Comparada y Gramática de Construcciones: Un Acercamiento a la Pluralización de haber Presentacional en las Capitales Antillanas.” Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada27 (2) : 338–364. doi: 10.1075/resla.27.2.05cla
     https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.27.2.05cla [Google Scholar]
  11. 2014d The Pluralization of Presentational Haber in Caribbean Spanish: A Study in Cognitive Construction Grammar and Comparative Sociolinguistics. Antwerp: University of Antwerp PhD dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. 2015 “Competing Constructions: The Pluralization of Presentational Haber in Dominican Spanish.” Cognitive Linguistics26 (1): 1–30. doi: 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0006
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0006 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2016 Cognitive, Social, and Individual Constraints on Linguistic Variation: A Case Study of Presentational Haber Pluralization in Caribbean Spanish. Berlin/Boston, MA: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110524154
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110524154 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2017 “La Pluralización de Haber Presentacional en el Español Peninsular: Datos de Twitter.” Sociolinguistic Studies11 (1): 41–64.10.1558/sols.30974
     https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.30974 [Google Scholar]
  15. . under review. “A Cognitive Sociolinguistic Model of Morphosyntactic Alternations: A Case Study of Subject Pronoun Expression in Cuban Spanish.” Review of Cognitive Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Claes, Jeroen and Daniel Ezra Johnson
    . under review. “Cognitive Linguistics and the Predictability of Effects: Agreement in English and Spanish Presentational Constructions.” Sociolinguistics Studies.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Croft, William
    2003 Typology and Universals. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. D’Aquino Ruiz, Giovanna
    2004 “ Haber Impersonal en el Habla de Caracas. Análisis Sociolingüístico.” Boletín de Lingüística21: 3–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Davies, Mark
    2002- Corpus del Español. 100 million words (1200s-1900s). AccessedJanuary 2016. www.corpusdelespanol.org/.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Dell, Gary S.
    1986 “A Spreading-Activation Theory of Retrieval in Sentence Production.” Psychological Review92 (3): 283–321. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.93.3.283
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283 [Google Scholar]
  21. DeMello, George
    1991 “Pluralización del Verbo Haber Impersonal en el Español Hablado Culto de Once Ciudades.” Thesaurus46: 445–471.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Díaz Campos, Manuel
    2003 “The Pluralization of haber in Venezuelan Spanish: A Sociolinguistic Change in Real Time.” IU Working Papers in Linguistics3 (5): 1–13.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Du Bois, John W.
    2003 “Argument structure: Grammar in use.” InPreferred Argument Structure: Grammar as Architecture for Function, ed. by John W. Du Bois , Lorraine E. Kumpf , and William Ashby , 11–60. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sidag.14.04dub
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.14.04dub [Google Scholar]
  24. Ellis, Nick C. , and Fernando Ferreira-Junior
    2009 “Constructions and Their Acquisition: Islands and the Distinctiveness of Their Occupancy.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics7: 187–220. doi: 10.1075/arcl.7.08ell
     https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.08ell [Google Scholar]
  25. Fernández-Ordóñez, Inés
    2005- “Corpus Oral y Sonoro del Español Rural (COSER).” AccessedMay 2016. www.corpusrural.es/.
  26. Geeraerts, Dirk
    2017 “Entrenchment as Onomasiological salience.” InEntrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning: How we Reorganize and Adapt Linguistic Knowledge, ed. by Hans-Jörg Schmid , 153–174. Berlin/Boston, MA: De Gruyter.10.1037/15969‑008
     https://doi.org/10.1037/15969-008 [Google Scholar]
  27. Gentry, Jeff
    2016 “twitteR: R Based Twitter Client.” AccessedAugust 2016. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/twitteR/index.html.
  28. Gili-Gaya, Samuel
    1980 Curso Superior de Sintaxis Española. Barcelona: Vox.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Goldberg, Adele E.
    1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. 2006 Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. 2011 “Corpus Evidence of the Viability of Statistical Preemption.” Cognitive Linguistics22 (1): 131–153. doi: 10.1515/cogl.2011.006
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2011.006 [Google Scholar]
  32. Gómez-Molina, José-Ramón
    2013 “Pluralización de Haber Impersonal en el Español de Valencia (España).” Verba40: 253–284.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Kahle, David , and Hadley Wickman
    2016 “ggmap: Spatial Visualization with ggplot2.” AccessedAugust 2016. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggmap/ggmap.pdf.
  34. Keenan, Edward
    1976 “Towards a Universal Definition of Subject.” InSubject and topic, ed. by Charles N. Li , 305–333. New York, NY: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Labov, William
    1994 Principles of Linguistic Change. Volume 1: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Langacker, Ronald W.
    1991 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. 2007 “Cognitive Grammar.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens , 421–462. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. 2008 Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2010 “Cognitive Grammar.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, ed. by Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog , 87–110. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Lastra, Yolanda , and Pedro Martín-Butragueño
    2016 “La concordancia de haber Existencial en la Ciudad de México.” Boletín de Filología51 (2): 121–145.10.4067/S0718‑93032016000200005
     https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-93032016000200005 [Google Scholar]
  41. Llorente, Antonio Maldonado de Guevara
    1980 “Consideraciones sobre el Español Actual.” Anuario de Letras18: 5–61.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Lorenzo, Emilio
    1971 El Español de Hoy: Lengua en Ebullición. Madrid: Gredos.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Myachykov, Andriy , and Russel S. Tomlin
    2015 “Attention and Salience.” InHandbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Ewa Dabrowska and Dagmar Divjak , 31–52. Berlin/New York, NY: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Nakagawa, Shinichi , and Holger Schielzeth
    2013 “A General and Simple Method for Obtaining R2 from Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Models.” Methods in Ecology and Evolution4: 133–142. doi: 10.1111/j.2041‑210x.2012.00261.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x [Google Scholar]
  45. Paredes-García, Florentino
    2016 “La pluralización del Verbo Haber Existencial en Madrid: ¿Etapas Iniciales de un Cambio Lingüístico?” Boletín de Filología51 (2): 209–234.10.4067/S0718‑93032016000200008
     https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-93032016000200008 [Google Scholar]
  46. Pato, Enrique
    2016 “La Pluralización de Haber en Español Peninsular.” InEn Torno a Haber: Construcciones, Usos y Variación desde el Latín hasta la Actualidad, ed. by Carlota de Benito Moreno and Álvaro Octavio de Toledo , 357–391. Berlin: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Prince, Ellen
    1992 “The ZPG letter: Subjects, Definiteness, and Information-status.” InDiscourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text, ed. by William C. Mann and Sandra A. Thompson , 295–326. New York, NY: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.16.12pri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.16.12pri [Google Scholar]
  48. Quilis, Antonio
    1983 La Concordancia Gramatical en la Lengua Española Hablada en Madrid. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2016 “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.” Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Real Academia Española and Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española
    Real Academia Española and Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española 2009 Nueva Gramática de la Lengua Española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Samper-Padilla, José Antonio and Clara Eugenia Hernández-Cabrera
    2012 “En Torno a los Usos Personales de Haber en el Español de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria”. InCum Corde et in Nova Grammatical: Estudios Ofrecidos a Guillermo Rojo, ed. by Tomás Jiménez Juliá , Belén López Meirama , Victoria Vázquez Rozas , and Alexandre Veiga , 743–754. Santiago de Compostela: University of Santiago de Compostela.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Schmid, Hans-Jörg , and Helmut Küchenhoff
    2013 “Collostructional Analysis and Other Ways of Measuring Lexicogrammatical Attraction: Theoretical Premises, Practical problems and Cognitive Underpinnings.” Cognitive Linguistics24 (3): 531–577. doi: 10.1515/cog‑2013‑0018
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2013-0018 [Google Scholar]
  53. Speelman, Dirk
    2014 “Logistic Regression: A Confirmatory Technique for Comparisons in Corpus Linguistics.” InCorpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative Studies in Polysemy and Synonymy, ed. by Dylan Glynn and Justyna A. Robinson , 487–533. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.43.18spe
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.43.18spe [Google Scholar]
  54. Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
    2008 Morphosyntactic Persistence in Spoken English: A Corpus Study at the Intersection of Variationist Sociolinguistics, Psycholinguistics, and Discourse Analysis. Berlin/Boston, NY: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Toutanova, Kristina , Christopher D. Klein , Dan Manning , and Yoram Singer
    2003 “Feature-Rich Part-of-Speech Tagging with a Cyclic Dependency Network.” Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics – Human Language Technologies. North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 252–259.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Wieling, Martijn , Simonetta Montemagni , John Nerbonne , and Rolf Harald Baayen
    2014 “Lexical Differences between Tuscan Dialects and Standard Italian: Accounting for Geographic and Socio-Demographic Variation Using Generalized Additive Mixed Modeling.” Language90 (3): 669–692.10.1353/lan.2014.0064
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2014.0064 [Google Scholar]
  57. Wood, Simon N.
    2016 “mgcv: Mixed GAM Computation Vehicle with GCV/AIC/REML Smoothness Estimation.” AccessedMay 2016. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mgcv/index.html.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00002.cla
Loading
Cognitive and geographic constraints on morphosyntactic variation
Belgian Journal of Linguistics 31, 30 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.00002.cla
/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00002.cla
/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00002.cla
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error