References

1. Aboh, Enoch
   2015 The Emergence of Hybrid Grammars: Language Contact and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139024167
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139024167 [Google Scholar]
2. Adger, David
   2014 “Variability and Grammatical Architecture.” InVariation in a Minimalist Perspective, ed. by Carme Picallo , 179–196. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Alexiadou, Artemis , Lilliane Haegeman , and Melita Stavrou
   2007 Noun Phrase in the Generative Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110207491
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207491 [Google Scholar]
4. Alexiadou, Artemis , and Gereon Müller
   2008 “Class Features as Probes.” InInflectional Identity, ed. by Asaf Bachrach , and Andrew Nevins , 101–155. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Alexiadou, Artemis , and Melita Stavrou
   1998 “Partitives and Pseudopartitives in Greek.” Studies in Greek Linguistics19: 1–13.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Alexiadou, Artemis , and Melita Stavrou
   1999 “Reflections on the Genitive in the Greek DP.” Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Greek Linguistics, 537–545. Athens: Ellinika Grammata.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Allen, Cynthia
   1997 “Middle English Case Loss and the Creolization Hypothesis.” English Language and Linguistics1: 63–89. doi: 10.1017/S1360674300000368
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674300000368 [Google Scholar]
8. Benmamoun, Elabbas , Silvina Montrul , and Maria Polinsky
   2013 “Heritage Languages and their Speakers: Opportunities and Challenges for Linguistics.” Theoretical Linguistics39: 129–181. doi: 10.1515/tl‑2013‑0009
   https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2013-0009 [Google Scholar]
9. Borer, Hagit
   2004 “The Grammar Machine.” InThe Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax-Lexicon Interface, ed. by Artemis Alexiadou , Elena Anagnostopoulou , and Martin Everaert , 228–331. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0012
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0012 [Google Scholar]
10. Chatzikyriakidis, Stergios , Giorgos Spathas , and Dimitris Micheliudakis
    2015 Promiscuous by-phrases in Greveniotika Greek. Paper presented at the12th International Conference on Greek Linguisitcs, September 2015, FU Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Collier, Scott James
    2013 The Evolution of Complexity in Greek Noun Morphology. Doctoral dissertation, University of Surrey.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gianollo, Chiara
    2012 “Prepositional Genitives in Romance and the Iissue of Parallel Development.” InParameter Theory and Linguistic Change, ed. by Charlotte Galves , Sonia Cyrino , Ruth Lopes , Filomena Sandalo , and Juanito Avelar , 281–303. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659203.003.0015
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659203.003.0015 [Google Scholar]
13. Holton, David , Peter A. Mackridge , and Irene Philippaki-Warburton
    1997 Greek: a Comprehensive Grammar of the Modern Language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Karatsareas, Petros
    2011 A Study of Cappadocian Greek Nominal Morphology from a Diachronic and Dialectological Perspective. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Kayne, Richard
    1993 “Towards a Modular Theory of Auxiliary Selection.” Studia Linguistica47: 3–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.1993.tb00837.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.1993.tb00837.x [Google Scholar]
16. Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
    2002 “Adnominal Possession in the European Languages: Form and Function.” Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF)55: 141–172.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kroch, Antony
    2001 “Syntactic change.” InThe Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, ed. by Mark Baltin , and Chris. Collins , 699–729. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470756416.ch22
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756416.ch22 [Google Scholar]
18. Lohndal, Terje
    2013 “Generative Grammar and Language Mixing.” Theoretical Linguistics39: 215–224. doi: 10.1515/tl‑2013‑0013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2013-0013 [Google Scholar]
19. Lohndal, Terje , and Marit Westergaard
    2016 “Grammatical Gender in American Norwegian Heritage Language: Stability or Attrition?” Frontiers in Psychology7: 344.10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00344
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00344 [Google Scholar]
20. Marinis, Theo
    2003 The Acquisition of the DP in Modern Greek. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lald.31
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.31 [Google Scholar]
21. Mertyris, Dionysios
    2014 The Loss of Genitive in Greek: a Diachronic and Dialectological Analysis. Doctoral dissertation, La Trobe University, Melbourne.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Montrul, Silvina
    2010 “How similar are L2 Learners and Heritage Speakers? Spanish Clitics and Word Order.” Applied Psycholinguistics31: 167–207. doi: 10.1017/S014271640999021X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271640999021X [Google Scholar]
23. Montrul, Silvina
    2016 The Acquisition of Heritage Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139030502
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139030502 [Google Scholar]
24. Nichols, Johanna , and Balthasar Bickel
    2013 “Locus of Marking in Possessive Noun Phrases. Genitives, Adjectives, and Relative Clauses.” InThe World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed. by Matthew S. Dryer , and Martin Haspelmath . Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Pires, Acrisio
    2012 “Heritage Bilingual Acquisition and Syntactic Change.” Paper presented at theConference on Formal Approaches to Heritage Language, UMass, Amherst, April 21–22, 2012. Available online: www.umass.edu/larc/events/fahl2012/files/fahl2012_pires.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
26. Polinsky, Maria
    2000 “American Russian: an endangered Language?” Ms.Harvard University.
27. Polinsky, Maria
    2011 “Reanalysis in Adult Heritage Language.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition3: 305–328. doi: 10.1017/S027226311000077X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311000077X [Google Scholar]
28. Ralli, Angela
    2000 “A Feature-Based Analysis of Greek Nominal Inflection.” Glossologia11–12: 201–227.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Ralli, Angela
    2003 “Morphology in Greek linguistics: the State of the Art.” Journal of Greek Linguistics4: 77–129. doi: 10.1075/jgl.4.09ral
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jgl.4.09ral [Google Scholar]
30. Rothman, Jason
    2007 “Heritage Speaker Competence Differences, Language Change, and Input Type: Inflected Infinitives in Heritage Brazilian Portuguese.” International Journal of Bilingualism11: 359–389. doi: 10.1177/13670069070110040201
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069070110040201 [Google Scholar]
31. Rothman, Jason
    2009 “Understanding the Nature and Outcomes of Early Bilingualism: Romance Languages as Heritage Languages.” International Journal of Bilingualism13: 155–163. doi: 10.1177/1367006909339814
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006909339814 [Google Scholar]
32. Schmid, Monika
    2011 Language Attrition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511852046
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511852046 [Google Scholar]
33. Scontras, Gregory , Suzanna Fuchs , and Maria Polinsky
    2015 “Heritage Language and Linguistic Theory.” Frontiers in Psychology6: 1545. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01545
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01545 [Google Scholar]
34. Sims, Andrea
    2006 Minding the Gaps: Inflectional Defectiveness in a Paradigmatic Theory. Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Simonenko, Alexandra
    2010 “Disappearance of Old French Juxtaposition Genitive and Case Loss: a Corpus Study.” Proceedings of the 2010 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Snyder, William
    2007 Child Language: the Parametric Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Sorace, Antonella
    1993 “Incomplete vs. Divergent Representations of Unaccusativity.” Second Language Research9: 22–47. doi: 10.1177/026765839300900102
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839300900102 [Google Scholar]
38. Stephany, Ursula
    1997 “The Acquisition of Greek.” InThe Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, vol.4, ed. by Dan I. Slobin , 183–333. Mahwah, NJ/London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Stephany, Ursula , and Anastasia Christofidou
    2007 “The Acquisition of Greek Case, Number, and Gender: a Usage Based Approach.” Arbeitspapier, Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität zu Köln.
40. Thomason, Sarah
    2001 Language Contact: An Introduction. Edinburgh & Washington, DC: Edinburgh University Press & Georgetown University Press.10.1016/B0‑08‑043076‑7/03032‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/03032-1 [Google Scholar]
41. Tsimpli, Ianthi , and Aafke Hulk
    2013 “Grammatical Gender and the Notion of Default: Insights from Language Acquisition.” Lingua137: 128–144. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.09.001 [Google Scholar]
42. Yager, Lisa , Nora Hellmold , Hyoun-A Joo , Michael T. Putnam , Eleonora Rossi , Catherine Stafford , and Joseph Salmons
    2015 “New Structural Patterns in Moribund Grammar: Case Marking in Heritage Grammar.” Frontiers in Psychology6: 1716. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01716
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01716 [Google Scholar]
43. Zombolou, Katerina
    2011 “Attrition in Greek Diaspora: Grammars in Contact or Incomplete Acquisition?” InLanguage Contact and Language Shift: Grammatical and Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. by Kalechukwu Ihemere . ch. 3. Munich: Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]