1887
Current trends in analyzing syntactic variation
  • ISSN 0774-5141
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9676
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Our contribution is dedicated to the empirical testing of alleged regional variants of object clitic clusters in modern French in France, Belgium and Switzerland. We provide some intriguing new insights into the regional distribution of non-standard variants and discuss one hypothesis on their nature and two hypotheses to explain their coming into being: language-contact (with Francoprovençal, Occitan and Oïl dialects, H1) and/or analogical leveling (H2), on the one hand, and their postsyntactic, rather than syntactic, nature, on the other (H3). Our main results reveal that the three non-standard variants where order in object clitic clusters is concerned are not regionally well-distributed, i.e. the observed distribution does not correspond to any cohesive area. In contrast, only one variant where the selection of the form ( vs. ) is at issue seems to be regionally confined: it is found in French-speaking Switzerland, in Gascony, plus some rare attestations of it in the North of France. All in all, variation in object clitic clusters indicates a genuinely new geographical articulation of regional French that does not coincide with traditional dialectal areas.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00004.ava
2018-04-23
2018-11-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adger, David , and Daniel Harbour
    2007 “Syntax and Syncretisms of the Person Case Constraint”. Syntax10/1: 2–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anagnostopoulou, Elena
    2003The Syntax of Ditransitives. Evidence from Clitics. Berlin/New York, Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aub-Büscher, Gertrud
    1962Le parler rural de Ranrupt. Paris, Klincksieck.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Avanzi, Mathieu , Cécile Barbet , Julie Glikman , and Julie Peuvergne
    2015 “Présentation d’une enquête pour l’étude les régionalismes du français”. Actes du cinquième congrès mondial de linguistique française (CMLF), Tours (France), 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Avanzi, Mathieu , Marie-José Béguelin , and Federica Diémoz
    2016 “De l’archive de parole au corpus de référence: la base de données orales du français de Suisse romande (OFROM)”. Corpus15: 309–342.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Blanche-Benveniste, Claire
    2010Le français. Usages de la langue parlée. Leuven/Paris, Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bolly, Catherine , Georges Christodoulides , and Anne Catherine Simon
    2016 “Disfluences et vieillissement langagier. De la base de données VALIBEL aux corpus outillés en français parlé”. Corpus15: 195–212.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bonami, Olivier , and Gilles Boyé
    2007 “French Pronominal Clitics and the Design of Paradigm Function Morphology”. Proceedings of the 5th Mediterranean Morphology Meeting, Fréjus, 291–322.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bonet, Eulalia
    1991Morphology after Syntax: Pronominal Clitics in Romance. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. doi: 10.1007/BF00992853
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992853 [Google Scholar]
  10. 1995 “Feature Structure of Romance Clitics”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory13: 607–647. doi: 10.1007/BF00992853
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992853 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brun-Trigaud, Guylaine
    2013 “Les chaînes de clitiques : traitements cartographiques”. InMémoires du terrain : enquêtes, matériaux, traitement des données, ed. by Francis Manzano , 139–155. Lyon, CEL/Lyon III.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bürgi, Anne
    1999 “Le pronom ‘ça’ en français vaudois”, Vox Romanica58: 149–171.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cardinaletti, Anna , and Michal Starke
    1999 “The Typology of Structural Deficiency: A Case Study of Three Classes of Pronouns”, InClitics in the languages of Europe, ed. by Henk van Riemsdijk , 145–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Clédat, Léon
    1887 “Les patois de la région lyonnaise”. Revue des patois1: 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 1925 “Les pronoms personnels avant et après le verbe”. Revue de philologie française37: 43–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dagnac, Anne
    2012 “La variation régionale des proformes faibles en français”. Ms., Université de Toulouse.
  17. Dalbera, Jean-Philippe
    1986 “Les pronoms personnels atones dans les parlers des Alpes-Maritimes. Champ et mécanismes de variation”. InActes du XVIIIe Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie romane, ed. by Dieter Kremer , vol.3, 599–611. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Dauzat, Albert
    1930Histoire de la langue française. Paris, Payot.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. De Kok, Ans
    1985La place du pronom personnel régime conjoint en français: une étude diachronique. Amsterdam: Rodopi Bv Editions.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Dottin, Georges & Jean Langouet
    1901Glossaire du parler de Pléchâtel. Geneva, Slatkine.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Foulet, Lucien
    1924 “L’accent tonique et l’ordre des mots: formes faibles du pronom personnel après le verbe”. Romania50: 54–93.10.3406/roma.1924.4573
    https://doi.org/10.3406/roma.1924.4573 [Google Scholar]
  22. 1958Petite syntaxe de l’ancien français. Paris: Honoré Champion.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gilliéron, Jules , and Edmond Edmont
    1902–1910Atlas linguistique de la France. Paris: Champion.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Groupe ICOR
    Groupe ICOR 2016 “CLAPI, une base de données multimodale pour la parole en interaction: apports et dilemmes”. Corpus15: 165–194.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Grévisse, Maurice , and André Goosse
    2008Le bon usage. Bruxelles, Duculot.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Goldbach, Maria
    2007 “The Distributed Morphology of Object Clitics in Modern French”. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft26: 41–81. doi: 10.1515/ZFS.2007.010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ZFS.2007.010 [Google Scholar]
  27. Heap, David , and Sevtlana Kaminskaïa
    2001 “Variable Clitic Sequences in Nonstandard French: Feature Geometry or Optimality?”. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics7/3: 101–114.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Heap, David et al.
    (2017) “5 Clitic pronouns”. InManual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax, ed. by Andreas Dufter and Elisabeth Stark , 183–229. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110377088‑005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110377088-005 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hervé, Bernard
    1973Le parler de Plouguenast. Mémoire de maîtrise, Université de Haute Bretagne.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hirschbühler, Paul , and Marie Labelle
    2001 “La position des clitiques par rapport au verbe à l’impératif dans l’évolution du français”. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes30: 13–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kahle, David , and Hadley Wickham
    2013 “ggmap: Spatial Visualization with ggplot2”. The R Journal5/1: 144–161.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kristol, Andrès
    2016 “Francoprovençal”. InOxford Guide to the Romance Languages, ed. by Adam Ledgeway , and Martin Maiden , 350–362. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0020
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0020 [Google Scholar]
  33. Laenzlinger, Christopher
    1993 “A Syntactic View of Romance Pronominal Sequences”. Probus5/3: 242–270.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 1994 “Enclitic Clustering: The Case of French Positive Imperatives”. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa19: 71–104.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lefeuvre, Florence , and Sonia Branca
    2016 “Le CFPP2000: constitution, outils et analyses. Le cas des interrogatives indirectes”. Corpus15: 265–285.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lepelley, René
    1974Le parler normand du Val de Saire. Caen: Musée de Normandie.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Miller, Philipp , and Ivan A. Sag
    1997 “French Clitic Movement without Clitics or Movement”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory15/3: 573–639. doi: 10.1023/A:1005815413834
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005815413834 [Google Scholar]
  38. Miller, Philipp , and Paola Monachesi
    2003 “Les pronoms clitiques dans les langues romanes”. InLes langues romanes, problèmes de la phrase simple, ed. by Danièle Godard , 67–123. Paris, Editions du CNRS.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Morin, Y.
    1979a “More remarks on French clitic order”. Linguistic Analysis5/3: 293–312.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 1979b “La morphophonologie des clitiques en français populaire”. Cahiers de linguistique9, 1–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Oliviéri, Michèle , and Patric Sauzet
    2016 “Southern Gallo-Romance (Occitan)”. InOxford Guide to the Romance languages, ed. by Adam Ledgeway , and Martin Maiden , 319–349. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0019
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0019 [Google Scholar]
  42. Perlmutter, David M.
    1970 “Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax”. Linguistic Inquiry1: 187–255.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 1971Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax. New York et al.: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Pescarini, Diego
    2014 “Prosodic Restructuring and Morphological Opacity. The Evolution of Italo-Romance Clitic Clusters”. InDiachrony and Dialects: Grammatical Change in the Dialects of Italy, ed. by Paola Benincà , Adam Ledgeway , and Nigel Vincent , 155–176. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701781.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701781.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  45. R development core Team
    R development core Team 2016 “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing”.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Remacle, Louis
    1937Le parler de la Gleize. Liège: H. Vaillant-Carmanne.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Reymond, Jules , and Maurice Bossard
    1979Le patois vaudois. Grammaire et vocabulaire. Lausanne: Cabédita Editions.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Rezac, Milan
    2010 “Ineffability through Modularity: Gaps in French Clitic Clusters in Defective Paradigms: Missing Forms and What They Tell us”. InProceedings of the British Academy163, ed. by Matthew Baerman , Greville G. Corbett , and Dunstan Brown , 151–180. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Rézeau, Pierre
    1976Un patois de Vendée: le parler rural de Vouvant. Paris: Klincksieck.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Riegel, Martin , Jean-Christophe Pellat , and René Rioul
    1994Grammaire méthodique du français. Paris: PUF.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Ronjat, Jules
    1937Essai de syntaxe des parlers provençaux modernes. Mâcon: imp. Protat.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Séguy, Jean
    1950Le français parlé à Toulouse. Toulouse: Privat.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. 1973Atlas linguistique et ethnographique de la Gascogne. (vol.5). Paris: Éditions du CNRS.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Singy, Pascal
    1996L’image du français en Suisse romande. Une enquête sociolinguistique en Pays de Vaud. Paris, L’Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Smith, John C.
    2016 “French and northern Gallo-Romance”. InOxford Guide to the Romance languages, ed. by Adam Ledgeway , and Martin Maiden , 292–318. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0018
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0018 [Google Scholar]
  56. Tuaillon, Gaston
    1983 “Régionalismes grammaticaux”. Recherches sur le français parlé5: 227–240.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Violin-Wigent, Anne
    2010 “ Tu lui les as donnés ? Variation dans l’ordre des pronoms multiples en phrases déclaratives”. InActes du deuxième Congrès Mondial de la Langue Française (CMLF), Nouvelle-Orléans (USA) 2001-2014.10.1051/cmlf/2010030
    https://doi.org/10.1051/cmlf/2010030 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00004.ava
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00004.ava
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error