1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Belgian Journal of Linguistics
  4. Volume 31, Issue 1
  5. Article
Current trends in analyzing syntactic variation
  • ISSN 0774-5141
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9676
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper investigates agreement mismatches in Dutch relatives. While the norm is that singular neuter nouns occur with the relative pronoun ‘that’, it is by now quite common to find neuter nouns combining with the relative pronoun . A large Twitter corpus is used to study which linguistic variables make ‘that’ in this context more likely. Lack of agreement between neuter noun and relative pronoun is very frequent in this corpus (37.5% of the cases, 46.8% if the preceding determiner is indefinite). Non-agreement is most common for nouns that are high in the animacy ranking, but it also occurs with other semantic classes, and there is quite a bit of lexical variation. Young, female users have a stronger tendency to use non-agreeing relative pronouns. Contrary to what previous work suggests, we do not find that users with a Moroccan or Turkish background have a stronger tendency towards non-agreement. A comparison of tweets with agreeing and non-agreeing pronouns and a comparison of the Twitter corpus with web data both suggest that non-agreement is characteristic of informal language use.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00006.bou
2018-04-23
2024-12-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00006.bou
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alis, Christian M. , and May T. Lim
    2013 “Spatio-Temporal Variation of Conversational Utterances on Twitter”. PLOS ONE8 (10): e77793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077793
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077793 [Google Scholar]
  2. Argamon, Shlomo , Moshe Koppel , James W. Pennebaker , and Jonathan Schler
    2007 “Mining the Blogosphere: Age, Gender and the Varieties of Self-Expression”. First Monday, 12 (9). doi: 10.5210/fm.v12i9.2003
     https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v12i9.2003 [Google Scholar]
  3. Audring, Jenny
    2006 “Pronominal Gender in Spoken Dutch”. Journal of Germanic Linguistics18 (2): 85–116. doi: 10.1017/S1470542706000043
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470542706000043 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2009 Reinventing Pronoun Gender. PhD thesis Free University, Amsterdam.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Baayen, R. Harald
    2001 Word frequency distributions. Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑010‑0844‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0844-0 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baldwin, Tim , Paul Cook , Marco Lui , Andrew MacKinlay , and Li Wang
    2013 “How Noisy Social Media Text, how dffrnt Social Media Sources”. International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bamman, David , Jacob Eisenstein , and Tyler Schnoebelen
    2014 “Gender Identity and Lexical Variation in Social Media”. Journal of Sociolinguistics18 (2): 135–160. doi: 10.1111/josl.12080
     https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12080 [Google Scholar]
  8. Barbiers, Sjef , Leonie Cornips , and Jan Pieter Kunst
    2007 “The Syntactic Atlas of the Dutch Dialects (sand): a Corpus of Elicited Speech and Text as an Online Dynamic Atlas. InCreating and digitizing language corpora, ed. by Joan Beal , Karen Corrigan , and Hermann Moisl , 54–90. Palgrave McMillan, New York.10.1057/9780230223936_4
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230223936_4 [Google Scholar]
  9. Biemann, Chris , Felix Bildhauer , Stefan Evert , Dirk Goldhahn , Uwe Quasthoff , Roland Schäfer , Johannes Simon , Leonard Swiezinski , and Torsten Zesch
    2013 “Scalable Construction of High-Quality Web Corpora”. Journal for Language Technology and Computational Linguistics28 (2): 23–60.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bouma, Gosse
    2015 “N-gram Frequencies for Dutch Twitter Data.” Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal5: 25–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Brants, Thorsten , and Alex Franz
    2009 Web 1T 5-gram, 10 European Languages Version 1 LDC2009T25. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia, https://catalog.ldc.upenn.edu/LDC2009T25.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Brysbaert, Marc , Michaël Stevens , Simon De Deyne , Wouter Voorspoels , and Gert Storms
    2014 “Norms of Age of Acquisition and Concreteness for 30,000 Dutch Words.” Acta Psychologica150: 80–84. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.010 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cornips, Leonie
    2002 “Ethnisch Nederlands.” InEen buurt in beweging: talen en culturen in het Utrechtse Lombok en Transvaal, ed. by H. Bennis , G. Extra , P. Muysken , and J. Nortier , 285–302. Stichting Beheer IISG, Amsterdam.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. 2008 “Loosing Grammatical Gender in Dutch: The Result of Bilingual Acquisition and/or an Act of Identity?” International Journal of Bilingualism12 (1–2): 105–124. doi: 10.1177/13670069080120010701
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069080120010701 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cornips, Leonie , Mara van der Hoek , and Ramona Verwer
    2006 “The Acquisition of Grammatical Gender in Bilingual Child Acquisition of Dutch (by Older Moroccan and Turkish Children). The Definite Determiner, Attributive Adjective and Relative Pronoun.” InLinguistics in The Netherlands. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. De Decker, Benny , and Reinhild Vandekerckhove
    2012 “Stabilizing Features in Substandard Flemish: The Chat Language of Flemish Teenagers as a Test Case.” Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik79 (2): 129–148.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. De Vogelaer, Gunther , and Gert De Sutter
    2011 “The Geography of Gender Change: Pronominal and Adnominal Gender in Flemish Dialects of Dutch.” Language Sciences33 (1): 192–205. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2010.02.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2010.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  18. De Vos, Lien
    2013 “On Variation in Gender Agreement: The Neutralization of Pronominal Gender in Dutch.” Synchrony and Diachrony: A dynamic interface133: 237–260. doi: 10.1075/slcs.133.10dev
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.133.10dev [Google Scholar]
  19. De Vos, Lien , and Gunther De Vogelaer
    2011 “Dutch Gender and the Locus of Morphological Regularization.” Folia Linguistica45 (2): 245–281. doi: 10.1515/flin.2011.011
     https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2011.011 [Google Scholar]
  20. Eisenstein, Jacob
    2013a “What to Do about Bad Language on the Internet.” InProceedings of NAACL-HLT, Association for Computational Linguistics, Atlanta, 359–369.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. 2013b “Phonological Factors in Social Media Writing.” NAACL 2013, Association for Computational Linguistics, Atlanta, 11–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Eisenstein, Jacob , Brendan O’Connor , Noah A Smith , and Eric P Xing
    2014 Diffusion of Lexical Change on Social Media.” PLOS ONE9 (1).
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Geerts, Guido , Walter Haeseryn , Jaap de Rooij , and Maarten C. van den Toorn
    1984 Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Gheuens, Koen
    2012 “Spelling op het internet; de chaos becijferd.” Levende Talen1: 26–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Hu, Yuheng , Kartik Talamadupula , and Subbarao Kambhampati
    2013 “Dude, srsly? The Surprisingly Formal Nature of Twitter’s Language.” In7th international AAAI conference on web logs and social media (ICWS), Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Jurafsky, Dan , Victor Chahuneau , Bryan R. Routledge , and Noah A. Smith
    2014 “Narrative Framing of Consumer Sentiment in Online Restaurant Reviews.” First Monday19 (4). doi: 10.5210/fm.v19i4.4944
     https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i4.4944 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kraaikamp, Margot
    2012 “The Semantics of the Dutch Gender System. Journal of Germanic Linguistics24 (03): 193–232. doi: 10.1017/S1470542712000074
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470542712000074 [Google Scholar]
  28. Labov, William
    1972 Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 1990 “The Intersection of Sex and Social Class in the Course of Linguistic Change.” Language variation and change2 (02): 205–254. doi: 10.1017/S0954394500000338
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000338 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lemmens, Maarten
    2013 “Van (neutraal) tussenwerpsel naar (positief) evaluatief adjectief: ça va en oké in het Nederlands.” Internationale Linguistiek1: 5–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Malvern, David , and Brian Richards
    2012 “Measures of Lexical Richness.” The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Wiley Online. doi: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0755
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0755 [Google Scholar]
  32. Monroe, Burt L. , Michael P Colaresi , and Kevin M Quinn
    2008 “Fightin’ Words: Lexical Feature Selection and Evaluation for Identifying the Content of Political Conflict.” Political Analysis16 (4): 372–403. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpn018
     https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpn018 [Google Scholar]
  33. Nguyen, Dong , Noah A Smith , and Carolyn P Rosé
    2011 “Author Age Prediction from Text Using Linear Regression.” InProceedings of the 5th ACL-HLT Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, and Humanities, 115–123. Atlanta: Association for Computational Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Nguyen, Dong , Dolf Trieschnigg , and Theo Meder
    2013 “Tweetgenie: Development, Evaluation, and Lessons Learned.” InACM Sigweb Newsletter 4.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Nguyen, Dong , A Seza Doğruöz , Carolyn P Rosé , and Franciska de Jong
    2015 “Computational Sociolinguistics: A Survey.” Computational Linguistics42 (3): 537–593.10.1162/COLI_a_00258
     https://doi.org/10.1162/COLI_a_00258 [Google Scholar]
  36. Oostdijk, Nelleke
    2000 “The Spoken Dutch Corpus: Overview and first evaluation.” InProceedings of LREC 2000, 887–894, Athens: European Language Resources Association.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Rao, Delip , David Yarowsky , Abhishek Shreevats , and Manaswi Gupta
    2010 “Classifying Latent User Attributes in Twitter.” InProceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Search and mining user-generated contents, 37–44. Association for Computing Machinery. doi: 10.1145/1871985.1871993
     https://doi.org/10.1145/1871985.1871993 [Google Scholar]
  38. Tagliamonte, Sali A.
    2011 Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. Oxford: John Wiley & Son.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Tjong Kim Sang, Erik
    2011 “Het gebruik van Twitter voor taalkundig onderzoek.” TABU: Bulletin voor Taalwetenschap39 (1/2): 62–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Tjong Kim Sang, Erik , and Antal van den Bosch
    2013 “Dealing with Big Data: The Case of Twitter.” Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal3: 121–134.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Unsworth, Sharon , and Aafke Hulk
    2010 “L1 Acquisition of Neuter Gender in Dutch: Production and Judgement.” InLanguage acquisition and development: proceedings of GALA 2009. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. van Halteren, Hans , and Nelleke Oostdijk
    2014 “Variability in Dutch Tweets. An Estimate of the Proportion of Deviant Word Tokens”. Journal of Language Technology and Computational Linguistics29 (2): 97–124.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. van Noord, Gertjan
    2006 “At Last Parsing is Now Operational”. InTALN06. Verbum Ex Machina. Actes de la 13e conference sur le traitement automatique des langues naturelles, ed. by Piet Mertens , Cedrick Fairon , Anne Dister , and Patrick Watrin , 20–42. Louvain: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. van Noord, Gertjan , Gosse Bouma , Frank van Eynde , Daniel de Kok , Jelmer van der Linde , Ineke Schuurman , Erik Tjong Kim Sang , and Vincent Vandeghinste
    2013 “Large Scale Syntactic Annotation of Written Dutch: Lassy”. InEssential Speech and Language Technology for Dutch: the STEVIN Programme, ed. by Peter Spyns , and Jan Odijk 147–164. Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑30910‑6_9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30910-6_9 [Google Scholar]
  45. Zaenen, Annie , Jean Carletta , Gregory Garretson , Joan Bresnan , Andrew Koontz-Garboden , Tatiana Nikitina , M Catherine O’Connor , and Tom Wasow
    2004 “Animacy Encoding in English: Why and How”. InProceedings of the 2004 ACL workshop on discourse annotation, 118–125. Atlanta: Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.3115/1608938.1608954
     https://doi.org/10.3115/1608938.1608954 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00006.bou
Loading
Agreement mismatches in Dutch relatives
Belgian Journal of Linguistics 31, 136 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.00006.bou
/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00006.bou
/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00006.bou
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error