The role of roofing

References

1. Amenta, Luisa
   2003 Perifrasi aspettuali in greco e in latino: origini e grammaticalizzazioni. Milano: Francoangeli.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Blatt, Franz
   1957 “Latin influence on European syntax.” Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague11: 33–69. 10.1080/01050206.1957.10420495
   https://doi.org/10.1080/01050206.1957.10420495 [Google Scholar]
3. Carey, Kathleen
   1995 “Subjectification and the development of the English perfect.” InSubjectivity and Subjectivisation, ed. byDieter Stein, and Susan Wright, 83–102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511554469.005
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554469.005 [Google Scholar]
4. Ceglia, Luca
   1998 “L’evoluzione della costruzione perifrastica verbale nel greco del nuovo testamento.” Archivio Glottologico Italiano83: 20–44.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cysouw, Michael
   2011 “Quantitative explorations of the world-wide distribution of rare characteristics, or: the exceptionality of northwestern European languages.” InExpecting the unexpected: Exceptions in grammar, ed. byHorst J. Simon, and Heike Wiese, 411–431. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219098.411
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219098.411 [Google Scholar]
6. Dahl, Östen and Viveka Velupillai
   2013 “Perfects.” InThe World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed. byMatthew S. Dryer, and Martin Haspelmath. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atwals.info)
   [Google Scholar]
7. Drinka, Bridget
   2011 “The sacral stamp of Greek: Periphrastic constructions in New Testament translations of Latin, Gothic, and Old Church Slavonic.” InIndo-European syntax and pragmatics: Contrastive approaches, ed. byEirik Welo. Oslo Studies in Language3 (3): 41–73.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Drinka, Bridget
   2013 “Sources of auxiliation in the perfects of Europe.” InOn multiple source constructions in language change, ed. byFreek van de Velde, Hendrik De Smet, and Lobke Ghesquière. Studies in Language37: 597–643. (Republished as Volume 79 of Benjamins Current Topics Series, ed. byHendrik De Smet, Lobke Ghesquière, and Freek Van de Velde 2015, 129–174).
   [Google Scholar]
9. Drinka, Bridget
   2017 Language contact in Europe: The periphrastic perfect through history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139027694
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139027694 [Google Scholar]
10. Flobert, Pierre
    1975 Les verbes déponents latins des origins à Charlemagne. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Haspelmath, Martin
    1998 “How young is Standard Average European?” Language Sciences20: 271–287. 10.1016/S0388‑0001(98)00004‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(98)00004-7 [Google Scholar]
12. Haspelmath, Martin
    2001 “The European linguistic area: Standard Average European.” InLanguage typology and change. Sprachtypologie und sprachliche Universalien. La typologie des langues et les universaux linguistiques, ed. byHaspelmath, Martin, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher, and Worfgang Raible. Vol.2, 1492–1510. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Herman, József
    2000 Vulgar Latin. (translation byRoger WrightofLe latin vulgaire, Paris 1967) University Park, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Johannisson, Ture
    1945 Hava och vara. Som tempusbildande hjälpverb i de nordiska språken. Lund: C.W.K. Gleerup/Leipzig: Harrassowitz.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Metzger, Bruce
    1977 The early versions of the New Testament: Their origin, transmission, and limitations. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198261704.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198261704.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
16. McKitterick, Rosamond
    2008 Charlemagne: The formation of a European identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803314
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803314 [Google Scholar]
17. Norberg, Dag
    1943 Syntaktische Forschungen auf dem Gebiete des Spätlateins und des Frühen Mittellateins. Uppsala: Lundequistiska Bokhandeln.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Psaltes, Stamatios B.
    1913 Grammatik der Byzantinischen Chroniken. Göttingen: Vandenhoek and Ruprecht.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Roy, Joseph, and Bridget Drinka
    . (In preparation). “Expansion of the perfect in Late Middle and Early Modern English: Motivations and Explanations.”
    [Google Scholar]
20. Thielmann, P.
    1885 “Habere mit dem Part. Perf. Pass. Archiv für lateinische Lexicographie und Grammatik2: 372–423, 509–549.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Thieroff, Rolf
    2000 “On the areal distribution of tense-aspect categories in Europe.” Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, ed. byÖsten Dahl, 264–305. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
22. van der Auwera, Johan
    (ed.) 1998 Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110802610
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110802610 [Google Scholar]
23. Whorf, Benjamin L.
    1956 Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, ed. byJohn B. Carroll. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Wifstrand, Albert
    2005 “Greek prose style. An historical survey.” InEpochs and styles. Selected writings on the New Testament, Greek language and Greek culture in the post-classical era, ed. byLars Rydbeck, and Stanley E. Porter, 81–110. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
    [Google Scholar]