Construction mining

References

1. Bäckström, Linnéa , Lars Borin , Markus Forsberg , Benjamin Lyngfelt , Julia Prentice , and Emma Sköldberg
   2013 “Automatic Identification of Construction Candidates for a Swedish Constructicon.” InProceedings of the Workshop on Lexical Semantic Resources for NLP at NODALIDA 2013 (= NEALT Proceedings Series 19 / Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 88), ed. by Lars Borin , Ruth Vatvedt Fjeld , Markus Forsberg , Sanni Nimb , Pierre Nugues , and Bolette Sandford Pedersen , 2–11.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Borges Völker, Emanuel , Maximilian Wendt , Felix Hennig , and Arne Köhn
   2019 “HDT-UD: A Very Large Universal Dependencies Treebank for German.” InProceedings of the Third Workshop on Universal Dependencies (UDW, SyntaxFest 2019), 46–57. Paris: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/W19‑8006
   https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-8006 [Google Scholar]
3. Borin, Lars , Dana Dannélls , and Normunds Grūzītis
   2018 “Linguistics vs. Language Technology in Constructicon Building and Use.” In: Constructicography: Constructicon Development across Languages, ed. by Benjamin Lyngfelt , Lars Borin , Kyoko Ohara , and Tiago Timponi Torrent , 229–254. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.22.08bor
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.22.08bor [Google Scholar]
4. Dunn, Jonathan
   2017 “Computational Learning of Construction Grammars.” Language and Cognition9 (2): 254–292. 10.1017/langcog.2016.7
   https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2016.7 [Google Scholar]
5. Fillmore, Charles J.
   2008 “Border Conflicts: FrameNet Meets Construction Grammar.” InProceedings of the XIII EURALEX International Congress Barcelona, ed. by Elisenda Bernal , and Janet De Cesaris , 49–68. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Foth, Kilian A. , Arne Köhn , Niels Beuck , and Wolfgang Menzel
   2014 “Because Size Does Matter: The Hamburg Dependency Treebank.” InProceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14), ed. by Nicoletta Calzolari , Khalid Choukri , Thierry Declerck , Hrafn Loftsson , Bente Maegaard , Joseph Mariani , Asuncion Moreno , Jan Odijk , and Stelios Piperidis , 2326–2333. Reykjavik: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
   [Google Scholar]
7. Forsberg, Markus , Richard Johansson , Linnéa Bäckström , Lars Borin , Benjamin Lyngfelt , Joel Olofsson , and Julia Prentice
   2014 “From Construction Candidates to Constructicon Entries: An Experiment Using Semi-Automatic Methods for Identifying Constructions in Corpora.” Constructions and Frames, 6 (1): 114–135. 10.1075/cf.6.1.07for
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.6.1.07for [Google Scholar]
8. Fournier-Viger, Philippe , Jerry Chun-Wei Lin , Rage Uday Kiran , Yun Sing Koh , and Rincy Thomas
   2017 “A Survey of Sequential Pattern Mining.” Data Science and Pattern Recognition1 (1): 54–77.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Goldberg, Adele E.
   2006 Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Guthrie, David , Ben Allison , Wei Liu , Louise Guthrie , and Yorick Wilks
    2006 “A Closer Look at Skip-gram Modelling.” InProceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’06), ed. by Nicoletta Calzolari , Khalid Choukri , Aldo Gangemi , Bente Maegaard , Joseph Mariani , Jan Odijk , and Daniel Tapias , 1222–1225. Genoa: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
    [Google Scholar]
11. Herbst, Thomas
    (ed) 2019 From Lexicography to Constructicography. Special Issue of Lexicographica 35.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Honnibal, Matthew , and Ines Montani
    2017 spaCy 2: Natural Language Understanding with Bloom Embeddings, Convolutional Neural Networks and Incremental Parsing.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Lyngfelt, Benjamin , Lars Borin , Kyoko Ohara , and Tiago Torrent
    (eds) 2018 Constructicography: Constructicon Development across Languages (= Constructional Approaches to Language, 22). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.22
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.22 [Google Scholar]
14. Martí, Maria Antònia , Mariona Taulé , Venelin Kovatchev , and Maria Salamó
    2019 “DISCOver: DIStributional Approach Based on Syntactic Dependencies for Discovering COnstructions.” InCorpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory (published online ahead of print, 04.01.2019).
    [Google Scholar]
15. Shibuya, Yoshikata , and Kim Ebensgaard Jensen
    2015 “Mining for Constructions in Texts using N-Gram and Network Analysis.” Globe: A Journal of Language, Culture and Communication2: 23–54.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Sidorov, Grigori
    2019 Syntactic N-Grams in Computational Linguistics (= SpringerBriefs in Computer Science). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑14771‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14771-6 [Google Scholar]
17. Wible, David , and Nai-Lung Tsao
    2010 “StringNet as a Computational Resource for Discovering and Investigating Linguistic Constructions.” In: Proceedings of the NAACL HLT Workshop on Extracting and Using Constructions in Computational Linguistics, ed. by Magnus Sahlgren , and Ola Knutsson , 25–31. Los Angeles: Association for Computational Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Ziem, Alexander , and Alexander Lasch
    2013 Konstruktionsgrammatik. Konzepte und Grundlagen gebrauchsbasierter Ansätze [Construction Grammar: Concepts and Foundations of Usage-Based Approaches]. Berlin / New York: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110295641
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110295641 [Google Scholar]
19. Ziem, Alexander , Johanna Flick , and Phillip Sandkühler
    2019 “The German Constructicon Project: Framework, Methodology, Resources.” Lexicographica35: 15–40. 10.1515/lex‑2019‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lex-2019-0003 [Google Scholar]