1887
Volume 34, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0774-5141
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9676
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The German Constructicon Project (www.german-constructicon.de) aims at documenting grammatical constructions in contemporary standard German on the basis of annotated corpus examples, including relations between constructions and between constructions and evoked semantic frames. So far, the research focus has been mainly on the development and computational implementation of a constructicographic workflow (including a parsing pipeline) that allows for addressing any kind of constructions on varying levels of schematicity, idiomaticity, and abstractness. However, such an exemplar-driven procedure precludes us from systematically identifying constructional candidates. In this article, we scrutinize ways to operationalize and implement data-mining procedures to inductively identify construction candidates.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00030.bar
2020-12-31
2021-12-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bäckström, Linnéa , Lars Borin , Markus Forsberg , Benjamin Lyngfelt , Julia Prentice , and Emma Sköldberg
    2013 “Automatic Identification of Construction Candidates for a Swedish Constructicon.” InProceedings of the Workshop on Lexical Semantic Resources for NLP at NODALIDA 2013 (= NEALT Proceedings Series 19 / Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 88), ed. by Lars Borin , Ruth Vatvedt Fjeld , Markus Forsberg , Sanni Nimb , Pierre Nugues , and Bolette Sandford Pedersen , 2–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Borges Völker, Emanuel , Maximilian Wendt , Felix Hennig , and Arne Köhn
    2019 “HDT-UD: A Very Large Universal Dependencies Treebank for German.” InProceedings of the Third Workshop on Universal Dependencies (UDW, SyntaxFest 2019), 46–57. Paris: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/W19‑8006
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-8006 [Google Scholar]
  3. Borin, Lars , Dana Dannélls , and Normunds Grūzītis
    2018 “Linguistics vs. Language Technology in Constructicon Building and Use.” In: Constructicography: Constructicon Development across Languages, ed. by Benjamin Lyngfelt , Lars Borin , Kyoko Ohara , and Tiago Timponi Torrent , 229–254. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.22.08bor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.22.08bor [Google Scholar]
  4. Dunn, Jonathan
    2017 “Computational Learning of Construction Grammars.” Language and Cognition9 (2): 254–292. 10.1017/langcog.2016.7
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2016.7 [Google Scholar]
  5. Fillmore, Charles J.
    2008 “Border Conflicts: FrameNet Meets Construction Grammar.” InProceedings of the XIII EURALEX International Congress Barcelona, ed. by Elisenda Bernal , and Janet De Cesaris , 49–68. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Foth, Kilian A. , Arne Köhn , Niels Beuck , and Wolfgang Menzel
    2014 “Because Size Does Matter: The Hamburg Dependency Treebank.” InProceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14), ed. by Nicoletta Calzolari , Khalid Choukri , Thierry Declerck , Hrafn Loftsson , Bente Maegaard , Joseph Mariani , Asuncion Moreno , Jan Odijk , and Stelios Piperidis , 2326–2333. Reykjavik: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Forsberg, Markus , Richard Johansson , Linnéa Bäckström , Lars Borin , Benjamin Lyngfelt , Joel Olofsson , and Julia Prentice
    2014 “From Construction Candidates to Constructicon Entries: An Experiment Using Semi-Automatic Methods for Identifying Constructions in Corpora.” Constructions and Frames, 6 (1): 114–135. 10.1075/cf.6.1.07for
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.6.1.07for [Google Scholar]
  8. Fournier-Viger, Philippe , Jerry Chun-Wei Lin , Rage Uday Kiran , Yun Sing Koh , and Rincy Thomas
    2017 “A Survey of Sequential Pattern Mining.” Data Science and Pattern Recognition1 (1): 54–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Goldberg, Adele E.
    2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Guthrie, David , Ben Allison , Wei Liu , Louise Guthrie , and Yorick Wilks
    2006 “A Closer Look at Skip-gram Modelling.” InProceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’06), ed. by Nicoletta Calzolari , Khalid Choukri , Aldo Gangemi , Bente Maegaard , Joseph Mariani , Jan Odijk , and Daniel Tapias , 1222–1225. Genoa: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Herbst, Thomas
    (ed) 2019From Lexicography to Constructicography. Special Issue of Lexicographica 35.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Honnibal, Matthew , and Ines Montani
    2017 spaCy 2: Natural Language Understanding with Bloom Embeddings, Convolutional Neural Networks and Incremental Parsing.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lyngfelt, Benjamin , Lars Borin , Kyoko Ohara , and Tiago Torrent
    (eds) 2018Constructicography: Constructicon Development across Languages (= Constructional Approaches to Language, 22). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.22
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.22 [Google Scholar]
  14. Martí, Maria Antònia , Mariona Taulé , Venelin Kovatchev , and Maria Salamó
    2019 “DISCOver: DIStributional Approach Based on Syntactic Dependencies for Discovering COnstructions.” InCorpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory (published online ahead of print, 04.01.2019).
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Shibuya, Yoshikata , and Kim Ebensgaard Jensen
    2015 “Mining for Constructions in Texts using N-Gram and Network Analysis.” Globe: A Journal of Language, Culture and Communication2: 23–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Sidorov, Grigori
    2019Syntactic N-Grams in Computational Linguistics (= SpringerBriefs in Computer Science). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑14771‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14771-6 [Google Scholar]
  17. Wible, David , and Nai-Lung Tsao
    2010 “StringNet as a Computational Resource for Discovering and Investigating Linguistic Constructions.” In: Proceedings of the NAACL HLT Workshop on Extracting and Using Constructions in Computational Linguistics, ed. by Magnus Sahlgren , and Ola Knutsson , 25–31. Los Angeles: Association for Computational Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ziem, Alexander , and Alexander Lasch
    2013Konstruktionsgrammatik. Konzepte und Grundlagen gebrauchsbasierter Ansätze [Construction Grammar: Concepts and Foundations of Usage-Based Approaches]. Berlin / New York: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110295641
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110295641 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ziem, Alexander , Johanna Flick , and Phillip Sandkühler
    2019 “The German Constructicon Project: Framework, Methodology, Resources.” Lexicographica35: 15–40. 10.1515/lex‑2019‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lex-2019-0003 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00030.bar
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00030.bar
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): constructicography; construction mining; German constructicon; n-gram; patterns; UIF-PMI
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error