Let’s get into it

References

1. Baroni, Marco , Georgiana Dinu , and Germán Kruszewski
   2014 “Don’t Count, Predict! A Systematic Comparison of Context-Counting vs. Context-Predicting Semantic Vectors.” InProceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), ed. by Kristina Toutanova , and Hua Wu , 238–247. Baltimore, Maryland: Association for Computational Linguistics. doi:  10.3115/v1/P14‑1023
   https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/P14-1023 [Google Scholar]
2. Bergen, Benjamin K. , and Nancy Chang
   2005 “Embodied Construction Grammar in Simulation-Based Language Understanding.” InConstruction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman , and Mirjam Fried , 147–190. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/cal.3.08ber
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.3.08ber [Google Scholar]
3. Boleda, Gemma
   2020 “Distributional Semantics and Linguistic Theory.” Annual Review of Linguistics6 (1): 213–234. doi:  10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑011619‑030303
   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011619-030303 [Google Scholar]
4. Bolukbasi, Tolga , Kai-Wei Chang , James Zou , Venkatesh Saligrama , and Adam Kalai
   2016 “Man Is to Computer Programmer as Woman Is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings.” ArXiv:1607.06520 [Cs, Stat], July. arxiv.org/abs/1607.06520
   [Google Scholar]
5. Clark, Kevin , Urvashi Khandelwal , Omer Levy , and Christopher D. Manning
   2019 “What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT’s Attention.” ArXiv:1906.04341 [Cs], June. arxiv.org/abs/1906.04341. 10.18653/v1/W19‑4828
   https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-4828 [Google Scholar]
6. Croft, William
   2001 Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
7. De Pascale, Stefano
   2019 “Token-Based Vector Space Models as Semantic Control in Lexical Sociolectometry”. PhD dissertation, KU Leuven.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Devlin, Jacob , Ming-Wei Chang , Kenton Lee , and Kristina Toutanova
   2019 “BERT: Pre-Training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding”. InProceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), ed. by Jill Burstein , Christy Doran , and Thamar Solorio , 4171–4186. Minneapolis: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Giulianelli, Mario , Marco Del Tredici , and Raquel Fernández
   2020 “Analysing Lexical Semantic Change with Contextualised Word Representations.” ArXiv:2004.14118 [Cs], April. arxiv.org/abs/2004.14118. 10.18653/v1/2020.acl‑main.365
   https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.365 [Google Scholar]
10. Goldberg, Adele E.
    1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gupta, Abhijeet , Gemma Boleda , Marco Baroni , and Sebastian Padó
    2015 “Distributional Vectors Encode Referential Attributes.” InProceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, ed. by Lluís Màrquez , Chris Callison-Burch , and Jian Su , 12–21. Lisbon: Association for Computational Linguistics. doi:  10.18653/v1/D15‑1002
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D15-1002 [Google Scholar]
12. Heylen, Kris , Thomas Wielfaert , Dirk Speelman , and Dirk Geeraerts
    2015 “Monitoring Polysemy: Word Space Models as a Tool for Large-Scale Lexical Semantic Analysis.” Lingua157 (April): 153–172. doi:  10.1016/j.lingua.2014.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.12.001 [Google Scholar]
13. Hilpert, Martin
    2013 “Corpus-Based Approaches to Constructional Change.” In: The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, ed. by Thomas Hoffmann , and Graeme Trousdale , 458–475. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:  10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0025
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0025 [Google Scholar]
14. Hilpert, Martin , and David Correia Saavedra
    2017 “Using Token-Based Semantic Vector Spaces for Corpus-Linguistic Analyses: From Practical Applications to Tests of Theoretical Claims.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory16(2): 393–424. doi:  10.1515/cllt‑2017‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2017-0009 [Google Scholar]
15. Johnson, Jeff , Matthijs Douze , and Hervé Jégou
    2017 “Billion-Scale Similarity Search with GPUs.” ArXiv:1702.08734 [Cs], February. arxiv.org/abs/1702.08734
    [Google Scholar]
16. Linzen, Tal , Grzegorz Chrupała , Yonatan Belinkov , and Dieuwke Hupkes
    (eds) 2019 Proceedings of the 2019 ACL Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP. Florence: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W19-4800
    [Google Scholar]
17. Louwerse, Max M. , and Rolf A. Zwaan
    2009 “Language Encodes Geographical Information.” Cognitive Science33 (1): 51–73. doi:  10.1111/j.1551‑6709.2008.01003.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2008.01003.x [Google Scholar]
18. Manning, Christopher D. , Prabhakar Raghavan , and Hinrich Schütze
    2009 An Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Perek, Florent
    2016 “Using Distributional Semantics to Study Syntactic Productivity in Diachrony: A Case Study.” Linguistics54 (1): 149–188. doi:  10.1515/ling‑2015‑0043
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2015-0043 [Google Scholar]
20. Peters, Matthew , Mark Neumann , Mohit Iyyer , Matt Gardner , Christopher Clark , Kenton Lee , and Luke Zettlemoyer
    2018 “Deep Contextualized Word Representations.” InProceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers), ed. by Marilyn Walker , Heng Ji , and Amanda Stent , 2227–2237. New Orleans: Association for Computational Linguistics. doi:  10.18653/v1/N18‑1202
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-1202 [Google Scholar]
21. Schlechtweg, Dominik , Stefanie Eckmann , Enrico Santus , Sabine Schulte im Walde , and Daniel Hole
    2017 “German in Flux: Detecting Metaphoric Change via Word Entropy.” InProceedings of the 21st Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL 2017), ed. by Roger Levy , and Lucia Specia , 354–367. Vancouver: Association for Computational Linguistics. doi:  10.18653/v1/K17‑1036
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/K17-1036 [Google Scholar]
22. Sommerauer, Pia , and Antske Fokkens
    2018 “Firearms and Tigers Are Dangerous, Kitchen Knives and Zebras Are Not: Testing Whether Word Embeddings Can Tell”. InProceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP, ed. by Tal Linzen , Grzegorz Chrupała , and Afra Alishahi , 276–286. Brussels: Association for Computational Linguistics. doi:  10.18653/v1/W18‑5430
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-5430 [Google Scholar]
23. Stefanowitsch, Anatol , and Stefan Gries
    2003 “Collostructions: Investigating the Interaction between Words and Constructions.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics8 (2): 209–243. 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste [Google Scholar]
24. Vaswani, Ashish , Noam Shazeer , Niki Parmar , Jakob Uszkoreit , Llion Jones , Aidan N. Gomez , Lukasz Kaiser , and Illia Polosukhin
    2017 “Attention Is All You Need”. ArXiv:1706.03762 [Cs], December. arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762
    [Google Scholar]
25. Yoon, Jiyoung , and Stefan Th Gries
    (eds) 2016 Corpus-Based Approaches to Construction Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.19
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.19 [Google Scholar]