1887
Volume 34, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0774-5141
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9676
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study seeks to gain a better insight into the origin and expansion of the construction <> (lit. goes to be that ) in Peninsular Spanish. We argue that this construction derives from the use of the periphrastic future construction < ‘go to’ + > in a pseudo-cleft sentence whose subject is a deictic element or an element that conveys the speaker’s attitudinal assessment of the propositional content expressed in the attribute, a complement -clause. The etymological structure evolves through a process that formally implies the suppression of the explicit subject and the fusion of the components leading to the conventionalization of refutative and assertive values. To demonstrate this directionality, we examine recent stages of change and develop syntactic and semantic-pragmatic arguments grounded in a data-based approach.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00037.gar
2020-12-31
2021-06-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. corde: real academia espaÑola
    corde: real academia espaÑola: www.rae.es
  2. crea: real academia espaÑola
    crea: real academia espaÑola: www.rae.es
  3. corpes xxi: real academia espaÑola
    corpes xxi: real academia espaÑola: www.rae.es
  4. twitter
  5. Aaron, Jessica
    2006Variation and Change in Spanish Future Temporal Expression: Rates, Constraints, and Grammaticization. New Mexico: UNM.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Barðdal, Jóhanna , Elena Smirnova , Lotte Sommerer , and Spike Gildea
    (eds) 2015Diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18 [Google Scholar]
  7. Delahunty, Gerald
    2001 “Discourse Functions of Inferential Sentences.” Linguistics39: 517–545. 10.1515/ling.2001.022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2001.022 [Google Scholar]
  8. Enghels, Renata
    2018 “Towards a Constructional Approach to Discourse-level Phenomena.” Folia Linguistica52 (1): 107–138. 10.1515/flin‑2018‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2018-0002 [Google Scholar]
  9. Fried, Mirjam
    2009 “Construction Grammar as a Tool for Diachronic Analysis.” Constructions and Frames1 (2): 262–291. 10.1075/cf.1.2.04fri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.1.2.04fri [Google Scholar]
  10. Garachana, Mar
    2017La gramática en la diacronía [Grammar in diachrony]. Madrid: Iberoamericana.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2021 “La evolución de ir a + inf en zonas de contacto lingüístico [The evolution of going to + inf in areas of linguistic contact].” InDinámicas lingüísticas de las situaciones de contacto [Linguistic dynamics of contact situations], ed. by Azucena Palacios , and María Sánchez , 323–345. Frankfurt: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110701364‑014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110701364-014 [Google Scholar]
  12. Goldberg, Adele
    2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gómez Torrego, Leonardo
    1999 “Los verbos auxiliares. Las perífrasis verbales de infinitivo [Auxiliary verbs. Infinitive verbal periphrases].” InGramática descriptiva de la lengua española [Descriptive grammar of the Spanish language], ed. by Ignacio Bosque , and Violeta Demonte , 3323–3389. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gutiérrez Ordóñez, Salvador
    2000Temas, remas, focos, tópicos y comentarios [Themes, rhemes, foci, topics and comments]. Madrid: Arco Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hilpert, Martin
    2014Construction Grammar and its Applications to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Textbooks on the English Language.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2018 “Three Open Questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar”. InGrammaticalization Meets Construction Grammar, ed. by Evie Coussé , Peter Andersson , and Joel Olofsson , 21–39. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.21.c2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.21.c2 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ledgeway, Adam , and Martin Maiden
    2016The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Maiden, Martin , Adam Ledgeway , and John Charles Smith
    (eds.) 2011The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages: Structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Marín Arrese, Juana
    2017 “Multifunctionality of Evidential Expressions in Discourse Domains and Genres.” InEvidentiality Revisited, ed. by Juana Marín Arrese , Gerda Haßler , and Marta Carretero , 195–224. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.271.09mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.271.09mar [Google Scholar]
  20. Pons, Salvador
    2014 “El siglo XX como diacronía [The 20th century as diachrony].” Rilce30 (3): 985–1016.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Pusch, Claus
    2006 “Marqueurs discursifs et subordination syntaxique [Discourse markers and syntactic subordination].” InLes marqueurs discursifs dans les langues romanes [Discourse markers in Romance languages], ed. by Martina Drescher , and Barbara Frank-Job , 173–188. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. RAE-ASALE
    RAE-ASALE 2009Nueva gramática de la lengua española [New grammar of the Spanish language]. Madrid: Espasa.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Rosemeyer, Malte and María Sol Sansiñena
    . In press. “How Sentence Type Influences the Interpretation of Spanish Future Constructions.” Functions of Language.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs , and Ekkehard König
    1991 “The Semantics-Pragmatics of Grammaticalization Revisited.” InApproaches to Grammaticalization. Volume I: Theoretical and Methodological Issues, ed. by Elizabeth Closs Traugott , and Bernd Heine , 189–218. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.19.1.10clo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.10clo [Google Scholar]
  25. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs , and Graeme Trousdale
    2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00037.gar
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00037.gar
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error