Strange sounds, familiar words

References

1. Bannert, Robert
   1981 “Referat av diskussionen i sektionen Talperceptionsforskning och nordisk hörförståelse [Report on the discussion in the section Spoken Language Perception and Nordic listening comprehension].” InInternordisk språkförståelse: Föredrag och diskussioner vid ett symposium på Rungstedgaard utanför Köpenhamn den 24–26 mars 1980, anordnat av Sekretariatet för Nordiskt Kulturellt Samarbete vid Nordiska Ministerrådet [Internordic speech comprehension: Presentations and discussions at a symposium at Rungstedgaard outside Copenhagen on March 24–26, 1980, commissioned by Sekretariatet för Nordiskt Kulturellt Samarbete at Nordiska Ministerrådet], ed. by Claes-Christian Elert , 37–45. Umeå: Universitetet i Umeå.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Braunmüller, Kurt
   1995 “Semikommunikation und semiotische Strategien. Bausteine zu einem Modell für die Verständigung im Norden zur Zeit der Hanse.” InNiederdeutsch und die skandinavischen Sprachen, vol.2, ed. by Kurt Braunmüller , 35–70. Heidelberg: Winter.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Braunmüller, Kurt
   2008 On the Relevance of Receptive Multilingualism in a Globalised World: Theory, History and Evidence from Today’s Scandinavia. Hamburg: Universität Hamburg, Sonderforschungsgebiet Mehrsprachigkeit.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bybee, Joan L.
   2010 Language, Usage, and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
5. Delsing, Lars-Olof , and Katarina Lundin Åkesson
   2005 Håller språket ihop Norden? En forskningsrapport om ungdomars förståelse av danska, svenska och norska [Does language hold the North together? A research report on adolescents’ comprehension skills in Danish, Swedish and Norwegian]. Copenhagen: Nordiska Ministerrådet. 10.6027/tn2005‑573
   https://doi.org/10.6027/tn2005-573 [Google Scholar]
6. Ellis, Nick C. , and Stefanie Wulff
   2019 “Cognitive Approaches to L2 Acquisition.” InThe Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning, ed. by John W. Schwieter , and Alessandro G. Benati , 41–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108333603.003
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108333603.003 [Google Scholar]
7. Goldberg, Adele
   2019 Explain Me This. Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Gooskens, Charlotte , and Renée van Bezooijen
   2013 “Explaining Danish-Swedish Asymmetric Word Intelligibility. An Error Analysis.” InPhonetics in Europe: Perception and Production, ed. by Charlotte Gooskens , and Renée van Bezooijen , 59–82. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Hilpert, Martin
   2019 “Higher-order Schemas in Morphology: What They Are, How They Work, and Where to Find Them.” Word Structure12 (3): 261–273. 10.3366/word.2019.0149
   https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2019.0149 [Google Scholar]
10. Höder, Steffen
    2018 “Grammar is Community-specific: Background and Basic Concepts of Diasystematic Construction Grammar.” InConstructions in Contact: Constructional Perspectives on Contact Phenomena in Germanic Languages, ed. by Hans C. Boas , and Steffen Höder , 37–70. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.24.02hod
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.24.02hod [Google Scholar]
11. Höder, Steffen
    2019 “Phonological Schematicity in Multilingual Constructions: A Diasystematic Perspective on Lexical Form.” Word Structure12 (3): 334–352. 10.3366/word.2019.0152
    https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2019.0152 [Google Scholar]
12. Höder, Steffen , Julia Prentice , and Sofia Tingsell
    . Forthc. “Acquisition of Additional Languages as Reorganization in the Multilingual Constructicon.” InConstructions in Contact 2. Language Change, Multilingual Practices, and Additional Language Acquisition ed. by Hans C. Boas , and Steffen Höder . Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.30.10hod
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.30.10hod [Google Scholar]
13. Klein, Horst G. , and Tilbert D. Stegmann
    2000 EuroComRom – Die sieben Siebe. Romanische Sprachen sofort lesen können. 2nd ed.Aachen: Shaker.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Möller, Robert , and Ludger Zeevaert
    2015 “Investigating Word Recognition in Intercomprehension: Methods and Findings.” Linguistics53 (2): 313–352. 10.1515/ling‑2015‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2015-0006 [Google Scholar]
15. Pulvermüller, Friedemann
    1996 “Hebb’s Concept of Cell Assemblies and the Psychophysiology of Word Processing.” Psychophysiology33 (4): 317–333. 10.1111/j.1469‑8986.1996.tb01057.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb01057.x [Google Scholar]
16. Sandøy, Helge
    2005 “The Typological Development of the Nordic Languages I: Phonology.” InThe Nordic Languages. An International Handbook of the North Germanic Languages, vol.2, ed. by Oskar Bandle , Kurt Braunmüller , Ernst Håkon Jahr , Allan Karker , Hans-Peter Naumann , and Ulf Teleman , 1852–1871. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
17. van Heuven, Vincent J.
    2008 “Making Sense of Strange Sounds: (Mutual) Intelligibility of Related Language Varieties. A Review.” International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing2 (1–2): 39–62. 10.3366/E1753854809000305
    https://doi.org/10.3366/E1753854809000305 [Google Scholar]
18. Vanhove, Jan
    2016 “The Early Learning of Interlingual Correspondence Rules in Receptive Multilingualism.” International Journal of Bilingualism20 (5): 580–593. 10.1177/1367006915573338
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006915573338 [Google Scholar]
19. Vihman, Marilyn , and William Croft
    2007 “Phonological Development: Toward a ‘Radical’ Templatic Phonology.” Linguistics45 (4): 683–725. 10.1515/LING.2007.021
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2007.021 [Google Scholar]
20. Weinreich, Uriel
    1954 “Is a Structural Dialectology Possible?” Word10: 388–400. 10.1080/00437956.1954.11659535
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1954.11659535 [Google Scholar]
21. Weinreich, Uriel
    1964 Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. 3rd ed.London: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Zeldes, Amir
    2012 Productivity in Argument Selection: From Morphology to Syntax. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110303919
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110303919 [Google Scholar]