The issue of specifying slots in argument structure constructions in terms of form and meaning

References

1. Barðdal, Jóhanna , and Spike Gildea
   2015 “Diachronic Construction Grammar: Epistemological Context, Basic Assumptions and Historical Implications.” InDiachronic Construction Grammar, ed. by Jóhanna Barðdal , Elena Smirnova , Lotte Sommerer , and Spike Gildea (eds.), 1–49. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.18.01bar
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.01bar [Google Scholar]
2. Beckner, Clay , Richard Blythe , Joan Bybee , Morton H. Christiansen , William Croft , Nick C. Ellis , John Holland , Jinyun Ke , Diane Larsen-Freeman , and Tom Schoenemann
   2009 “Language is a Complex Adaptive System: Position Paper.” Language Learning59: 1–26. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00533.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00533.x [Google Scholar]
3. Behrens, Heike
   2011 “Grammatik und Lexikon im Spracherwerb: Konstruktionsprozesse.” InSprachliches Wissen zwischen Lexikon und Grammatik, ed. by Stefan Engelberg , Anke Holler , and Kristel Proost , 375–396. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110262339.375
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110262339.375 [Google Scholar]
4. Boas, Hans C.
   2003 A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Boas, Hans C.
   2005 “Determining the Productivity of Resultative Constructions: A Reply to Goldberg & Jackendoff.” Language81(2): 448–464. 10.1353/lan.2005.0050
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0050 [Google Scholar]
6. Boas, Hans C.
   2011 “Zum Abstraktionsgrad von Resultativkonstruktionen.” InSprachliches Wissen zwischen Lexikon und Grammatik, ed. by Stefan Engelberg , Kristel Proost , and Anke Holler , 37–69. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110262339.37
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110262339.37 [Google Scholar]
7. Boas, Hans C. , and Alexander Ziem
   2018 “Constructing a Constructicon for German: Empirical, Theoretical and Methodological Issues.” InConstructicography: Constructicon Development across Languages, ed. by Benjamin Lyngfelt , Lars Borin , Kyoko Ohara , and Tiago Timponi Torrent , 183–228. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.22.07boa
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.22.07boa [Google Scholar]
8. Bußmann, Hadumod
   2008 Lexikon der Sprachwissenschaft. 4th edn.Stuttgart: Kröner.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bybee, Joan
   2010 Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
10. Croft, William
    2012 Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248582.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248582.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
11. Davies, Mark
    2008– The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Available online athttps://www.english-corpora.org/coca/
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dirven, René , and Günter Radden
    2007 Cognitive English Grammar. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/clip.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clip.2 [Google Scholar]
13. Dürscheid, Christa
    2013 “Casus obliquus.” Wörterbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft (WSK) Online (2013). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. https://db.degruyter.com/view/WSK/wsk_id_wsk_artikel_artikel_8550 (Last accessed29 August, 2020).
    [Google Scholar]
14. Faulhaber, Susen
    2011 Verb Valency Patterns: A Challenge for Semantics-Based Accounts. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110240788
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110240788 [Google Scholar]
15. Fillmore, Charles J.
    1968 “The Case for Case.” InUniversals in Linguistic Theory, ed. by Emmon Bach , and Robert T. Harms , 0–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Fillmore, Charles J.
    2007 “Valency Issues in FrameNet.” InValency: Theoretical, Descriptive and Cognitive Issues, ed. by Thomas Herbst , and Katrin Götz-Votteler , 129–160. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Fillmore, Charles J.
    2014 “Frames, Constructions and FrameNet.” InConstructions – Collocations – Patterns, ed. by Thomas Herbst , Hans-Jörg Schmid , and Susen Faulhaber , 121–166. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110356854.121
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110356854.121 [Google Scholar]
18. Goldberg, Adele E.
    1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Goldberg, Adele E.
    2006 Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Goldberg, Adele E.
    2019 Explain Me This: Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Goldberg, Adele E. , and Ray Jackendoff
    2004 “The English Resultative as a Family of Constructions.” Language80(3): 532–568. 10.1353/lan.2004.0129
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2004.0129 [Google Scholar]
22. Haugen, Tor Arne
    2012 Polyvalent Adjectives in Norwegian: Aspects of their Semantics and Complementation Patterns. Oslo: University of Oslo.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Helbig, Gerhard , and Wolfgang Schenkel
    1973 Wörterbuch zur Valenz und Distribution deutscher Verben. Leipzig: Verlag Enzyklopädie.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Herbst, Thomas
    2011 “The Status of Generalizations: Valency and Argument Structure Constructions.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik59(4): 347–367. 10.1515/zaa‑2011‑0406
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2011-0406 [Google Scholar]
25. Herbst, Thomas
    2014 “The Valency Approach to Argument Structure Constructions.” InConstructions – Collocations – Patterns, ed. by Thomas Herbst , Hans-Jörg Schmid , and Susen Faulhaber , 167–216. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110356854.167
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110356854.167 [Google Scholar]
26. Herbst, Thomas
    2016 “Foreign Language Learning is Construction Learning – what else? Moving towards Pedagogical Construction Grammar.” InApplied Construction Grammar, ed. by Sabine de Knop , and Gaëtanelle Gilquin , 21–51. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110458268‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110458268-003 [Google Scholar]
27. Herbst, Thomas
    2020 “Constructions, Generalizations, and the Unpredictability of Language: Moving towards Colloconstruction Grammar.” Constructions and Frames12(1): 56–96. doi:  10.1075/cf.00035.her
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00035.her [Google Scholar]
28. Herbst, Thomas , David Heath , Ian F. Roe , and Dieter Götz
    2004 A Valency Dictionary of English. London/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110892581
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110892581 [Google Scholar]
29. Herbst, Thomas , and Thomas Hoffmann
    2018 “Construction Grammar for Students: A Constructionist Approach to Syntactic Analysis (CASA).” Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association6: 197–218. 10.1515/gcla‑2018‑0010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2018-0010 [Google Scholar]
30. Herbst, Thomas , and Susen Schüller
    2008 Introduction to Syntactic Analysis: A Valency Approach. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Hilpert, Martin
    2020 “Constructional Approaches.” InThe Oxford Handbook of English Grammar, ed. by Bas Aarts , Jill Bowie , and Gergana Popova , 106–123. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Hoffmann, Thomas
    2015 “Cognitive Sociolinguistic Aspects of Football Chants: the Role of Social and Physical Context in Usage-Based Construction Grammar.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik66(3): 273–294. 10.1515/zaa‑2015‑0023
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2015-0023 [Google Scholar]
33. Huddleston, Rodney , and Geoffrey K. Pullum
    2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316423530
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530 [Google Scholar]
34. Langacker, Ronald W.
    2008 Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
35. Quirk, Randolph , Sidney Greenbaum , Geoffrey Leech , and Jan Svartvik
    1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London/New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Saussure, Ferdinand de
    1916 Cours de linguistique générale (Ed. by Charles Bally & Albert Séchehaye ). Lausanne: Payot.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Schmid, Hans-Jörg
    2000 English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110808704
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808704 [Google Scholar]
38. Schmid, Hans-Jörg
    2020 The Dynamics of the Linguistic System: Usage, Conventionalization and Entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198814771.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198814771.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
39. Schumacher, Helmut , Jacqueline Kubczak , Renate Schmidt , and Vera de Ruiter
    2004 valbu – Valenzwörterbuch deutscher Verben. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Uhrig, Peter
    2018 Subjects in English: From Valency Grammar to a Constructionist Treatment of Non-Canonical Subjects. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110589801
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110589801 [Google Scholar]