1887
Volume 34, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0774-5141
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9676
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Japanese mimetics, and its psychomimes (e.g. ‘disappointed’), in particular, are usually accompanied in speech with bodily movements, including gestures and postures. I have already argued that certain patterns in co-speech gestures and postures that accompanied psychomimes showed a relatively high rate of concord across speakers (Kanetani 2019). Taking the co-speech bodily movements as metonymic representations of embodied metaphors of emotion, this paper suggests that these kinetic features may be stored as part of the speaker’s knowledge of the words and argue that Japanese psychomimes are multimodal lexical constructions. I also show how such multimodal constructions are represented in the mind and how they are expressed in actual use. In particular, I describe and examine two-dimensional form-meaning pairings (based on Kita 1997) and show that one of the two dimensions may be selectively expressed in a given context.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00044.kan
2020-12-31
2021-08-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akita, Kimi
    2009 A Grammar of Sound-Symbolic Words in Japanese: Theoretical Approaches to Iconic and Lexical Properties of Mimetics. PhD dissertation, Kobe University.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2017 “Grammatical and Functional Properties of Mimetics in Japanese.” InThe Grammar of Japanese Mimetics: Perspectives from Structure, Acquisition, and Translation, ed. by Noriko Iwasaki , Peter Sells , and Kimi Akita , 20–34. Oxon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cienki, Alan
    2008 “Why Study Metaphor and Gesture?” InMetaphor and Gesture, ed. by Alan Cienki and Cornelia Müller , 5–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.3.04cie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.3.04cie [Google Scholar]
  4. de Saussure, Ferdinand
    1916Cours de linguistique générale [Course in General Linguistics]. Paris: Payot.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dingemanse, Mark , and Kimi Akita
    2017 “An Inverse Relation between Expressiveness and Grammatical Integration: On the Morphosyntactic Typology of Ideophones, with Special Reference to Japanese.” Journal of Linguistics53(3): 501–532. 10.1017/S002222671600030X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S002222671600030X [Google Scholar]
  6. Fillmore, Charles , Paul Kay , and Mary Catherine O’Connor
    1988 “Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone.” Language64(3): 501–538. 10.2307/414531
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414531 [Google Scholar]
  7. Goldberg, Adele E.
    1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Haiman, John
    2018Ideophones and the Evolution of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107706897
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107706897 [Google Scholar]
  9. Kanetani, Masaru
    2019 “Toward a Multimodal CxG Analysis of Japanese Mimetic Expressions.” Paper presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, held onAugust 21–24atLeipzig University.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kendon, Adam
    2004Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  11. Kita, Sotaro
    1997 “Two-Dimensional Semantic Analysis of Japanese Mimetics.” Linguistics35(2): 379–415. 10.1515/ling.1997.35.2.379
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1997.35.2.379 [Google Scholar]
  12. Kövecses, Zoltán
    2000Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lakoff, George
    1987Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  14. Lakoff, George , and Mark Johnson
    1980Metaphors we Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ono, Masahiro
    (ed) 2007Giongo/gitigo 4500: Nihongo onomatope jiten [Dictionary of Japanese Onomatopoeias]. Tokyo: Shogakkan.
  16. Riidaazu Eiwa Jiten Henshuubu (ed)
    Riidaazu Eiwa Jiten Henshuubu (ed) 2007Manga de tanoshimu Eigo giongo jiten [A Treasure-House of English Onomatopoeias]. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.
  17. Sweetser, Eve. E.
    1990From Etymology to Pragmatics Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
  18. Voeltz, F. K. Erhard , and Christa Kilian-Hatz
    (eds) 2001Ideophones. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.44
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.44 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ziem, Alexander
    2017 “Do we Really Need Multimodal Construction Grammar?” Linguistics Vanguard3(S1). doi:  10.1515/lingvan‑2016‑0095
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0095 [Google Scholar]
  20. Zima, Elisabeth , and Alexander Bergs
    2017 “Multimodality and Construction Grammar.” Linguistics Vanguard3(S1). doi:  10.1515/lingvan‑2016‑1006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-1006 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00044.kan
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00044.kan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error