Volume 34, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0774-5141
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9676
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



In this paper we use corpora of four monolingual German-speaking children at 2 years of age to analyze the effect of input on the activation of chunks and frame-and-slot patterns. For this purpose, we first investigate to what extent chunks and patterns can be traced back to the direct input compared to input which is not part of the immediate discourse situation. Second, we take mean length of utterance (MLU) into account to see how the level of proficiency influences the amount of priming in each child. Results indicate that children with a lower MLU rely more on priming than children who are more proficient. This conclusion is consistent with the usage-based assumption that children’s linguistic development starts with a strongly item-based reproduction of input patterns that gradually gives rise to increasingly creative and productive uses of constructions.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Arnon, Inbal , and Morten H. Christiansen
    2017 “More Than Words: The Role of Multiword Sequences in Language Learning and Use.” Topics in Cognitive Science9(3): 542–551. 10.1111/tops.12274
    https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12274 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bannard, Colin , Elena Lieven , and Michael Tomasello
    2009 “Modelling Children’s Early Grammatical Knowledge.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences106(41): 17284–17289. 10.1073/pnas.0905638106
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905638106 [Google Scholar]
  3. Behrens, Heike
    2006 “The Input-Output Relationship in First Language Acquisition.” Language and Cognitive Processes21: 2–24. 10.1080/01690960400001721
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960400001721 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cameron-Faulkner, Thea , Elena Lieven , and Michael Tomasello
    2003 “A Construction Based Analysis of Child Directed Speech.” Cognitive Science27(6): 843–873. 10.1207/s15516709cog2706_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2706_2 [Google Scholar]
  5. Dąbrowska, Ewa
    2012 “Different Speakers, Different Grammars: Individual Differences in Native Language Attainment.” Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism2 (3): 219–253. https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/lab.2.3.01dab. 10.1075/lab.2.3.01dab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.2.3.01dab [Google Scholar]
  6. Dąbrowska, Ewa , and Elena Lieven
    2005 “Towards a Lexically Specific Grammar of Children’s Question Constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics16(3): 437–474. 10.1515/cogl.2005.16.3.437
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2005.16.3.437 [Google Scholar]
  7. Frank, Michael , Mika Braginsky , Daniel Yurovsky , and Virginia Marchman
    2017 “Wordbank: An Open Repository for Developmental Vocabulary Data.” Journal of Child Language44 (3): 677–694. <doi:  10.1017/S0305000916000209
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000916000209 [Google Scholar]
  8. Kirjavainen, Minna , and Anna Theakston
    2011 “Are Infinitival to Omission Errors Primed by Prior Discourse? The Case of WANT Constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics22(4): 629–657. 10.1515/cogl.2011.024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2011.024 [Google Scholar]
  9. Koch, Nikolas
    2019Schemata im Erstspracherwerb: eine Traceback-Studie für das Deutsche. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110623857
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110623857 [Google Scholar]
  10. Lieven, Elena , Heike Behrens , Jennifer Speares , and Michael Tomasello
    2003 “Early Syntactic Creativity: A Usage-Based Approach.” Journal of Child Language30: 333–370. 10.1017/S0305000903005592
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000903005592 [Google Scholar]
  11. Lieven, Elena , Dorothé Salomo , and Michael Tomasello
    2009 “Two-Year-Old Children’s Production of Multiword Utterances: A Usage-Based Analysis.” Cognitive Linguistics20: 481–507. 10.1515/COGL.2009.022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2009.022 [Google Scholar]
  12. Pickering, Martin J. , and Victor S. Ferreira
    2008 “Structural Priming: A Critical Review.” Psychological Bulletin134(3): 427–459. 10.1037/0033‑2909.134.3.427
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.427 [Google Scholar]
  13. Rowland, Caroline F. , Franklin Chang , Ben Ambridge , Julian M. Pine , and Elena V. M. Lieven
    2012 “The Development of Abstract Syntax: Evidence from Structural Priming and the Lexical Boost.” Cognition125(1): 49–63. doi:  10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.008 [Google Scholar]
  14. Savage, Ceri , Elena Lieven , Anna Theakston , and Michael Tomasello
    2006 “Structural Priming as Implicit Learning in Language Acquisition: The Persistence of Lexical and Structural Priming in 4-Year-Olds.” Language Learning and Development2(1): 27–49. 10.1207/s15473341lld0201_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15473341lld0201_2 [Google Scholar]
  15. Schmid, Hans-Jörg
    2020The Dynamics of the Linguistic System: Usage, Conventionalization, and Entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198814771.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198814771.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Theakston, Anna , and Elena Lieven
    2008 “The Influence of Discourse Context on Children’s Provision of Auxiliary BE.” Journal of Child Language35: 129–158. doi:  10.1017/S0305000907008306
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000907008306 [Google Scholar]
  17. Tomasello, Michael
    2003Constructing a Language. A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Vogt, Paul , and Elena Lieven
    2010 “Verifying Theories of Language Acquisition Using Computer Models of Language Evolution.” Adaptive Behavior18(1): 21–35. 10.1177/1059712309350970
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712309350970 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): construction priming; language acquisition; traceback; usage-based model
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error