1887
Volume 34, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0774-5141
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9676
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This squib provides a theoretical discussion on the use of the terms and in Construction Grammar. In the literature, the difference between semantics and pragmatics is often conceptualized either in terms of conventionality or in terms of truth-conditionality (Huang 2014, 299). It will be shown that, even though constructionists claim that there is no semantics–pragmatics distinction, both these underlying concepts are central to the study of constructions. Therefore, the aim is twofold. First, in keeping with Cappelle (2017), it will be argued that constructionists should make more explicit the distinction between the two types of (encoded) meaning. Second, it will be shown that constructionists need to be more terminologically consistent and agree on how to use the terms and . Following Depraetere (2019), I will argue that the terms and are most explanatory when defined in truth-conditional terms. In this way, finer-grained understanding of the meaning of constructions can be achieved.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00048.lec
2020-12-31
2021-06-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brisard, Frank
    2006 “Exotisme en Spektakel in Construction Grammar [Exotism and spectacle in Construction Grammar].” InTussen Semantiek en Pragmatiek: Aangeboden aan Theo Janssen bij zijn Afscheid als Hoogleraar Nederlandse Taalkunde en Taalbeheersing aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, ed. by Ronny Boogaart , Saskia Daalder , Jan Noordegraaf , and Esther Pascual , 135–147. Amsterdam: VU Amsterdam, Stichting Neerlandistiek.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cappelle, Bert
    2017 “What’s Pragmatics Doing Outside Constructions?” InSemantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line, ed. by Ilse Depraetere , and Raphael Salkie , 115–151. Berlin: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑32247‑6_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32247-6_8 [Google Scholar]
  3. Carston, Robyn
    2010 “Explicit Communication and ‘Free’ Pragmatic Enrichment.” InExplicit Communication: Robyn Carston’s Pragmatics, ed. by Belén Soria , and Esther Romero , 217–285. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230292352_14
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230292352_14 [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark, Billy
    2013Relevance Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139034104
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139034104 [Google Scholar]
  5. Croft, William
    2009 “Toward a Social Cognitive Linguistics.” InNew Directions in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Vyvyan Evans , and Stéphanie Pourcel , 395–420. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.24.25cro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.24.25cro [Google Scholar]
  6. Croft, William , and Alan Cruse
    2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
  7. Depraetere, Ilse
    2019 “Meaning in Context and Contextual Meaning: A Perspective on the Semantics–Pragmatics Interface Applied to Modal Verbs.” InAnglophonia. 28. doi:  10.4000/anglophonia.2453
    https://doi.org/10.4000/anglophonia.2453 [Google Scholar]
  8. Desagulier, Guillaume
    2011 “Le programme sociopragmatique des grammaires de constructions: Bilan et perspectives.” Intellectica56 (2): 99–123.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Finkbeiner, Rita
    2019 “Reflections on the Role of Pragmatics in Construction Grammar.” Constructions and Frames11 (2): 171–192. 10.1075/cf.00027.fin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00027.fin [Google Scholar]
  10. Goldberg, Adele E.
    1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2004 “Pragmatics and Argument Structure.” InThe Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn , and Gregory L. Ward , 427–441. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2013 “Constructionist Approaches.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, ed. by Thomas Hoffmann , and Graeme Trousdale , 15–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Grice, Paul
    1989Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gutzmann, Daniel
    2013 “Expressives and Beyond: An Introduction to Varieties of Use-Conditional Meaning.” InBeyond Expressives: Explorations in Use-Conditional Meaning, ed. by Daniel Gutzmann , and Hans-Martin Gärtner , 1–58. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004183988_002
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004183988_002 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2015Use-Conditional Meaning: Studies in Multi-Dimensional Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723820.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723820.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hilpert, Martin
    2019Construction Grammar and its Application to English. (2nd Ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hoffmann, Thomas , and Graeme Trousdale
    (eds) 2013The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  19. Huang, Yan
    2014Pragmatics. (2nd Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kay, Paul
    2004 “Pragmatic Aspects of Grammatical Constructions.” InHandbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn , and Gregory Ward , 675–700. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kay, Paul , and Charles J. Fillmore
    1999 “Grammatical Constructions and Linguistic Generalizations: The What’s X doing Y? Construction.” Language75: 1–33. 10.2307/417472
    https://doi.org/10.2307/417472 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kay, Paul , and Laura A. Michaelis
    2012 “Constructional Meaning and Compositionality.” InSemantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning (vol. 3), ed. by Claudia Maienborn , Klaus von Heusinger , and Paul Portner , 2271–2296. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Langacker, Ronald W.
    2008Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  24. Leclercq, Benoît
    2019 “On the Semantics–Pragmatics Interface: A Theoretical Bridge Between Construction Grammar and Relevance Theory.” PhD dissertation, University of Lille.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Leino, Jaakko
    2013 “Information Structure.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, ed. by Thomas Hoffmann , and Graeme Trousdale , 329–344. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. McNally, Louise
    2013 “Semantics and Pragmatics.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science4: 285–297. 10.1002/wcs.1227
    https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1227 [Google Scholar]
  27. Michaelis, Laura A.
    2012 “Making the Case for Construction Grammar.” InSign-Based Construction Grammar, ed. by Hans C. Boas , and Ivan A. Sag , 31–68. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Nikiforidou, Kiki
    2009 “Constructional Analysis.” InGrammar, Meaning and Pragmatics, ed. by Frank Brisard , Jan-Ola Östman , and Jef Verschueren , 16–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hoph.5.01nik
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.5.01nik [Google Scholar]
  29. Radden, Günter , Klaus-Michael Köpcke , Thomas Berg , and Peter Siemund
    2007 “The Construction of Meaning in Language.” InAspects of Meaning Construction, ed. by Günter Radden , Klaus-Michael Köpcke , Thomas Berg , and Peter Siemund , 1–15. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.136.02rad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.136.02rad [Google Scholar]
  30. Recanati, François
    2010Truth-Conditional Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226993.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226993.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  31. Stojanovic, Isidora
    2008 “The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction.” Synthese165 (3): 317–319. 10.1007/s11229‑007‑9190‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9190-9 [Google Scholar]
  32. auf der Straße, Alexander
    2017Constructions in Use. Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Wierzbicka, Anna
    1988The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.18 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00048.lec
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00048.lec
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Construction Grammar; conventions; pragmatics; semantics; truth-conditions
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error