1887
Volume 34, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0774-5141
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9676
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This squib sketches an approach to concessive conditionals (CCs) from the perspective of Radical Construction Grammar (Croft 2001). It brings earlier functional-typological work on CCs to bear on language-particular constructionist analyses of CCs, using the notions of ‘family (of constructions)’ and ‘prototype’ as the bridge. After suggesting how these notions can be applied to CCs under a functional-typological approach, the structure of the CC sub-constructicon in German is discussed, and directions for future research are offered to round the squib off.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00049.leu
2020-12-31
2021-08-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baschewa, Emilia
    1983 “Untersuchungen zur Diachronie des Konzessivsatzes im Neuhochdeutschen.” Beiträge zur Erforschung der deutschen Sprache3: 77–107.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bossuyt, Tom
    2016 “Zur Distribution von Irrelevanzpartikeln in was immer/auch-Konstruktionen. Positionelle und kombinatorische Varianz im Deutschen Referenzkorpus.” Germanistische Mitteilungen42: 45–70. 10.33675/GM/2016/1/4
    https://doi.org/10.33675/GM/2016/1/4 [Google Scholar]
  3. . Subm. “Concessive Conditionals in and beyond Europe.” Under review withStudies in Language.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bossuyt, Tom , Ludovic De Cuypere , and Torsten Leuschner
    2018 “Emergence Phenomena in W immer/auch-Subordinators.” InGrammar and Corpora 2016, ed. by Eric Fuß , Marek Konopka , Beata Trawinski , and Ulrich Waßner , 97–120. Heidelberg: heiUP. https://heiup.uni-heidelberg.de/reader/index/361/361-69-83994-1-10-20190212.xml
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bücker, Jörg
    2016 “Focus, Scales and Concessive Conditionals in German.” Language Sciences58: 163–177. 10.1016/j.langsci.2016.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  6. Croft, William
    2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Croft, William , and D. Alan Cruse
    2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
  8. d’Avis, Franz-Josef
    2016 “Satztyp als Konstruktion: Diskussion am Beispiel ‘konzessive Konditionalgefüge’.” InSatztypen und Konstruktionen, ed. by Rita Finkbeiner , and Jörg Meibauer , 267–295. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José Ruiz , Alba Luzondo Oyón , and Paula Pérez Sobrino
    (eds.) 2017Constructing Families of Constructions: Analytical Perspectives and Theoretical Challenges. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.58
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.58 [Google Scholar]
  10. De Vaere, Hilde , Julia Kolkmann and Thomas Belligh
    2020 “Allostructions Revisited.” Journal of Pragmatics170, 96–111. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.08.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.08.016 [Google Scholar]
  11. Diessel, Holger
    2019The Grammar Network: How Linguistic Structure Is Shaped by Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108671040
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108671040 [Google Scholar]
  12. Duffley, Patrick , and Pierre Larrivée
    2020 “ Whatever floats your boat: A Corpus-Based Investigation of Definiteness, Quantification, Modality, Presuppositional Content, Scalarity and Epistemic Stance with wh-ever Words.” International Review of Pragmatics12: 206–245. 10.1163/18773109‑01202002
    https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-01202002 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fujii, Seiko Y.
    1994 “A Family of Constructions: Japanese TEMO and Other Concessive Conditionals.” InProceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session Dedicated to the Contributions of Charles J. Fillmore, ed. by Susanne Gahl , Andy Dolbey , and Christopher Johnson , 194–207. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/BLS/article/view/1433/1217 10.3765/bls.v20i1.1433
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v20i1.1433 [Google Scholar]
  14. Geeraerts, Dirk
    2010Theories of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Goldberg, Adele E.
    2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Haspelmath, Martin , and Ekkehard König
    1998 “Concessive Conditionals in the Languages of Europe.” InAdverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, ed. by Johan van der Auwera , 563–640. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110802610.563
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110802610.563 [Google Scholar]
  17. König, Ekkehard
    1992 “From Discourse to Syntax: The Case of Concessive Conditionals.” InWho Climbs the Grammar Tree, ed. by Rosemarie Tracy , 423–433. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111633824.423
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111633824.423 [Google Scholar]
  18. König, Ekkehard , and Johan van der Auwera
    1988 “Clause Integration in German and Dutch Conditionals, Concessive Conditionals, and Concessives.” InClause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, ed. by John Haiman , and Sandra A. Thompson , 101–133. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.18.07kon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.07kon [Google Scholar]
  19. Kupietz, Marc , Harald Lüngen , Paweł Kamocki , and Andreas Witt
    2018 “The German Reference Corpus DeReKo: New Developments – New Opportunities.” InProceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, ed. by Nicoletta Calzolari , 4353–4360. www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2018/pdf/737.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lehmann, Christian
    1988 “Towards a Typology of Clause Linkage.” InClause-Combining in Grammar and Discourse, ed. by John Haiman , and Sandra A. Thompson , 181–225. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.18.09leh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.09leh [Google Scholar]
  21. Leuschner, Torsten
    2006Hypotaxis as Bulding-Site: The Emergence and Grammaticalization of Concessive Conditionals in English, German and Dutch. Munich: Lincom.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Nishigauchi, Taisuke
    1991 “Construing WH.” InLogical Structure and Linguistic Structure: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives, ed. by C.-T. James Huang , and Robert May , 197–231. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Oppliger, Rachel
    2018 “ Whatever the specific circumstances, …: a Construction Grammar Perspective o[n] wh-ever Clauses in English.” InSubordination in English: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives, ed. by Elena Seoane , Carlos Acuña-Fariña , and Ignacio Palacios-Martínez , 263–284. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110583571‑012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110583571-012 [Google Scholar]
  24. Panther, Klaus-Uwe , and Klaus-Michael Köpke
    2008 “A Prototype Approach to Sentences and Sentence Types.” InAnnual Review of Cognitive Linguistics6: 83–112. 10.1075/arcl.6.05pan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.6.05pan [Google Scholar]
  25. Rawlins, Kyle
    2008 “(Un)conditionals: An Investigation in the Syntax and Semantics of Conditional Structures.” PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Taylor, John R.
    2003Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Traugott, Elizabeth C. , and Graeme Trousdale
    2013Constructionalization and Constructional Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  28. Vander Haegen, Flor
    2019 “Die Emergenz irrelevanzkonditionaler Subjunktoren des Typs egal was. Variation und Grammatikalisierung anhand des Deutschen Referenzkorpus.” Germanistische Mitteilungen45: 113–138.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Vander Haegen, Flor , Tom Bossuyt , and Torsten Leuschner
    . Subm. “Emerging into Your Family of Constructions: German [IRR was] ‘no matter what’.” Under review withConstructions and Frames.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Waßner, Ulrich H.
    2006 “Zur Relevanz von und zur Irrelevanz bei Irrelevanzkonditionalen.” InGrammatische Untersuchungen. Analysen und Reflexionen. Gisela Zifonun zum 60. Geburtstag, ed. by Eva Breindl , Lutz Gunkel , and Bruno Strecker , 381–399. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Zifonun, Gisela , Ludger Hoffmann , and Bruno Strecker
    1997Grammatik der deutschen Sprache. 3volumes. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00049.leu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00049.leu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error