Concessive conditionals as a family of constructions

References

1. Baschewa, Emilia
   1983 “Untersuchungen zur Diachronie des Konzessivsatzes im Neuhochdeutschen.” Beiträge zur Erforschung der deutschen Sprache3: 77–107.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bossuyt, Tom
   2016 “Zur Distribution von Irrelevanzpartikeln in was immer/auch-Konstruktionen. Positionelle und kombinatorische Varianz im Deutschen Referenzkorpus.” Germanistische Mitteilungen42: 45–70. 10.33675/GM/2016/1/4
   https://doi.org/10.33675/GM/2016/1/4 [Google Scholar]
3. Bossuyt, Tom
   . Subm. “Concessive Conditionals in and beyond Europe.” Under review withStudies in Language.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bossuyt, Tom , Ludovic De Cuypere , and Torsten Leuschner
   2018 “Emergence Phenomena in W immer/auch-Subordinators.” InGrammar and Corpora 2016, ed. by Eric Fuß , Marek Konopka , Beata Trawinski , and Ulrich Waßner , 97–120. Heidelberg: heiUP. https://heiup.uni-heidelberg.de/reader/index/361/361-69-83994-1-10-20190212.xml
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bücker, Jörg
   2016 “Focus, Scales and Concessive Conditionals in German.” Language Sciences58: 163–177. 10.1016/j.langsci.2016.03.005
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.03.005 [Google Scholar]
6. Croft, William
   2001 Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
7. Croft, William , and D. Alan Cruse
   2004 Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
8. d’Avis, Franz-Josef
   2016 “Satztyp als Konstruktion: Diskussion am Beispiel ‘konzessive Konditionalgefüge’.” InSatztypen und Konstruktionen, ed. by Rita Finkbeiner , and Jörg Meibauer , 267–295. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
9. de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José Ruiz , Alba Luzondo Oyón , and Paula Pérez Sobrino
   (eds.) 2017 Constructing Families of Constructions: Analytical Perspectives and Theoretical Challenges. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.58
   https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.58 [Google Scholar]
10. De Vaere, Hilde , Julia Kolkmann and Thomas Belligh
    2020 “Allostructions Revisited.” Journal of Pragmatics170, 96–111. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.08.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.08.016 [Google Scholar]
11. Diessel, Holger
    2019 The Grammar Network: How Linguistic Structure Is Shaped by Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108671040
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108671040 [Google Scholar]
12. Duffley, Patrick , and Pierre Larrivée
    2020 “ Whatever floats your boat: A Corpus-Based Investigation of Definiteness, Quantification, Modality, Presuppositional Content, Scalarity and Epistemic Stance with wh-ever Words.” International Review of Pragmatics12: 206–245. 10.1163/18773109‑01202002
    https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-01202002 [Google Scholar]
13. Fujii, Seiko Y.
    1994 “A Family of Constructions: Japanese TEMO and Other Concessive Conditionals.” InProceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session Dedicated to the Contributions of Charles J. Fillmore, ed. by Susanne Gahl , Andy Dolbey , and Christopher Johnson , 194–207. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/BLS/article/view/1433/1217 10.3765/bls.v20i1.1433
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v20i1.1433 [Google Scholar]
14. Geeraerts, Dirk
    2010 Theories of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Goldberg, Adele E.
    2006 Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Haspelmath, Martin , and Ekkehard König
    1998 “Concessive Conditionals in the Languages of Europe.” InAdverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, ed. by Johan van der Auwera , 563–640. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110802610.563
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110802610.563 [Google Scholar]
17. König, Ekkehard
    1992 “From Discourse to Syntax: The Case of Concessive Conditionals.” InWho Climbs the Grammar Tree, ed. by Rosemarie Tracy , 423–433. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111633824.423
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111633824.423 [Google Scholar]
18. König, Ekkehard , and Johan van der Auwera
    1988 “Clause Integration in German and Dutch Conditionals, Concessive Conditionals, and Concessives.” InClause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, ed. by John Haiman , and Sandra A. Thompson , 101–133. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.18.07kon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.07kon [Google Scholar]
19. Kupietz, Marc , Harald Lüngen , Paweł Kamocki , and Andreas Witt
    2018 “The German Reference Corpus DeReKo: New Developments – New Opportunities.” InProceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, ed. by Nicoletta Calzolari , 4353–4360. www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2018/pdf/737.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lehmann, Christian
    1988 “Towards a Typology of Clause Linkage.” InClause-Combining in Grammar and Discourse, ed. by John Haiman , and Sandra A. Thompson , 181–225. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.18.09leh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.09leh [Google Scholar]
21. Leuschner, Torsten
    2006 Hypotaxis as Bulding-Site: The Emergence and Grammaticalization of Concessive Conditionals in English, German and Dutch. Munich: Lincom.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Nishigauchi, Taisuke
    1991 “Construing WH.” InLogical Structure and Linguistic Structure: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives, ed. by C.-T. James Huang , and Robert May , 197–231. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Oppliger, Rachel
    2018 “ Whatever the specific circumstances, …: a Construction Grammar Perspective o[n] wh-ever Clauses in English.” InSubordination in English: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives, ed. by Elena Seoane , Carlos Acuña-Fariña , and Ignacio Palacios-Martínez , 263–284. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110583571‑012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110583571-012 [Google Scholar]
24. Panther, Klaus-Uwe , and Klaus-Michael Köpke
    2008 “A Prototype Approach to Sentences and Sentence Types.” InAnnual Review of Cognitive Linguistics6: 83–112. 10.1075/arcl.6.05pan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.6.05pan [Google Scholar]
25. Rawlins, Kyle
    2008 “(Un)conditionals: An Investigation in the Syntax and Semantics of Conditional Structures.” PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Taylor, John R.
    2003 Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Traugott, Elizabeth C. , and Graeme Trousdale
    2013 Constructionalization and Constructional Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
28. Vander Haegen, Flor
    2019 “Die Emergenz irrelevanzkonditionaler Subjunktoren des Typs egal was. Variation und Grammatikalisierung anhand des Deutschen Referenzkorpus.” Germanistische Mitteilungen45: 113–138.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Vander Haegen, Flor , Tom Bossuyt , and Torsten Leuschner
    . Subm. “Emerging into Your Family of Constructions: German [IRR was] ‘no matter what’.” Under review withConstructions and Frames.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Waßner, Ulrich H.
    2006 “Zur Relevanz von und zur Irrelevanz bei Irrelevanzkonditionalen.” InGrammatische Untersuchungen. Analysen und Reflexionen. Gisela Zifonun zum 60. Geburtstag, ed. by Eva Breindl , Lutz Gunkel , and Bruno Strecker , 381–399. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Zifonun, Gisela , Ludger Hoffmann , and Bruno Strecker
    1997 Grammatik der deutschen Sprache. 3volumes. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]