1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Belgian Journal of Linguistics
  4. Volume 34, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 34, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0774-5141
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9676
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Constructions are abstractions of resources we have available as ways of expressing ourselves. The study argues for the feasibility of seeing constructions as flexible prototypes in terms of which we categorize the world: constructions have few if any necessary and sufficient conditions that are always applicable. As support for this view, an analysis of the correlative -construction in English is carried out, indicating that even if we can set up a dozen characteristics of the construction, none of them are necessary for an expression to be characterized as an instance of the construction. Furthermore, for constructional analyses to be truly usage-based, variations within prototypes have to be explicated. A Construction Discourse approach is used to show how pragmatic and discourse factors can distinguish and afford particular meanings and functions to non-prototypical instances of a construction.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00052.ost
2020-12-31
2024-12-04

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00052.ost
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Enkvist, Nils Erik
    1981 ”Experiential Iconicism in Text Strategy.” Text1 (1): 97–111. 10.1515/text.1.1981.1.1.97
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1981.1.1.97 [Google Scholar]
  2. Fillmore, Charles J.
    2020 Form and Meaning in Language, Volume III: Fillmore on Linguistic Theory and Constructions. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Fried, Mirjam , and Jan-Ola Östman
    2004 “Construction Grammar: A Thumbnail Sketch.” InConstruction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective, ed. by Mirjam Fried , and Jan-Ola Östman , 11–86. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.2.02fri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.2.02fri [Google Scholar]
  4. Morris, Charles W.
    1938 Foundations of the Theory of Signs [= International Encyclopedia of Unified Sciences 1:2]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Östman, Jan-Ola
    2005 “Construction Discourse: A Prolegomenon.” InConstruction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman , and Mirjam Fried , 121–144. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.3.06ost
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.3.06ost [Google Scholar]
  6. 2015 “From Construction Grammar to Construction Discourse … and back.” InKonstruktionsgrammatik V: Konstruktionen im Spannungsfeld von sequenziellen Mustern, kommunikativen Gattungen und Textsorten, ed. by Jörg Bücker , Susanne Günthner , and Wolfgang Imo , 15–44. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00052.ost
Loading
Constructions as discourse-restrained flexible prototypes
Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34, 273 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.00052.ost
/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00052.ost
/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00052.ost
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): concessive correlative; construction discourse; contextual attributes; prototype; TatT-construction

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error