What is an alternation?

References

1. Arppe, Antti , Gaëtanelle Gilquin , Dylan Glynn , Martin Hilpert , and Arne Zeschel
   2010 “Cognitive Corpus Linguistics: Five Points of Debate on Current Theory and Methodology.” Corpora5 (1): 1–27. 10.3366/cor.2010.0001
   https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2010.0001 [Google Scholar]
2. Bresnan, Joan
   2007 “Is Syntactic Knowledge Probabilistic?.” InRoots, ed. by Sam Featherston , and Wolfgang Sternefeld , 77–96. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Broekhuis, Hans , Norbert Corver , and Riet Vos
   2013 Syntax of Dutch. Verbs and Verb Phrases. Volume 1. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bybee, Joan
   2006 “From Usage to Grammar.” Language82 (4): 711–733. 10.1353/lan.2006.0186
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186 [Google Scholar]
5. Cappelle, Bert
   2006 “Particle Placement and the Case for ‘Allostructions.’” ConstructionsSV 1–7 (2006).
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cedergren, Henrietta , and David Sankoff
   1974 “Variable Rules: Performance as a Statistical Reflection of Competence.” Language50 (2): 333–355. 10.2307/412441
   https://doi.org/10.2307/412441 [Google Scholar]
7. D’Arcy, Alexandra
   2014 “Functional Partitioning and Possible Limits on Variability.” Journal of English Linguistics42 (3): 218–244. 10.1177/0075424214539702
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424214539702 [Google Scholar]
8. Dąbrowska, Ewa
   2018 “Experience, Aptitude and Individual Differences in Native Language Ultimate Attainment.” Cognition178: 222–235. 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.018
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.018 [Google Scholar]
9. De Smet, Isabeau , and Freek Van de Velde
   2019 “Reassessing the Evolution of West Germanic Preterite Inflection.” Diachronica36 (2): 139–180. 10.1075/dia.18020.des
   https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.18020.des [Google Scholar]
10. de Vriendt, Sera
    1965 Sterke Werkwoorden en Sterke Werkwoordsvormen in de 16e eeuw [Strong Verbs and Strong Verb Forms in the 16th Century]. Brussel: Belgisch Interuniversitair Centrum voor Neerlandistiek.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Diessel, Holger
    2019 The Grammar Network. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108671040
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108671040 [Google Scholar]
12. Duden
    Duden 2009 Die Grammatik [The Grammar]. 8th edn.Mannheim: Dudenverlag.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Ferreira, Victor , and Gary Dell
    2000 “Effect of Ambiguity and Lexical Availability on Syntactic and Lexical Production.” Cognitive Psychology40 (4): 296–340. 10.1006/cogp.1999.0730
    https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0730 [Google Scholar]
14. Ferreira, Victor , Adam Morgan , and Robert Slevc
    2018 “Grammatical Encoding.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics, ed. by Shirley-Ann Rueschemeyer , and Gareth Gaskell , 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Ferreira, Victor , and Elizabeth Schotter
    2013 “Do Verb Bias Effects on Sentence Production Reflect Sensitivity to Comprehension or Production Factors?” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology66 (8): 1548–1571. 10.1080/17470218.2012.753924
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.753924 [Google Scholar]
16. Geeraerts, Dirk
    2010a “Recontextualizing Grammar: Underlying Trends in Thirty Years of Cognitive Linguistics.” InCognitive Linguistics in Action, ed. by Elzbieta Tabakowska , Michal Choinski , and Lukasz Wiraszka , 71–102. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Geeraerts, Dirk
    2010b Ten Lectures on Cognitive Sociolinguistics. Beijing: Beijing Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. 10.1515/9783110226461
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226461 [Google Scholar]
18. Geeraerts, Dirk , Gitte Kristiansen , and Yves Peirsman
    2010  Introduction. InAdvances in Cognitive Sociolinguistics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts , Gitte Kristiansen , and Yves Peirsman , 1–19. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110226461.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226461.1 [Google Scholar]
19. Grondelaers, Stefan , Dirk Geeraerts , and Dirk Speelman
    2007 “A Case for Cognitive Corpus Linguistics.” InMethods in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Monica Gonzalez-Marquez , Irene Mittelberg , Seana Coulson , and Michael Spivey , 149–169. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.18.12gro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.18.12gro [Google Scholar]
20. Haeseryn, Walter , Kirsten Romijn , Guido Geerts , Jaap de Rooij , and Maarten van den Toorn
    1997 Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst [General Dutch Grammar]. 2nd edition. Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff/Deurne: Wolters Plantyn.
21. Hanks, Patrick
    2013 Lexical Analysis: Norms and Exploitations. Cambridge: MIT press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262018579.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262018579.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
22. Jaeger, Florian Tim
    2010 “Redundancy and Reduction: Speakers Manage Syntactic Information Density.” Cognitive Psychology61 (1): 23–62. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.02.002 [Google Scholar]
23. Kilgarriff, Adam
    1997 “I Don’t Believe in Word Senses.” Computers And The Humanities31 (2): 91–113. 10.1023/A:1000583911091
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000583911091 [Google Scholar]
24. Kruijsen, Joep , and Nicoline van der Sijs
    2016 “Meertens Kaartenbank” [Meertens Database of Maps]. Available as www.meertens.knaw.nl/kaartenbank/.
25. Labov, William
    1972 Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lavandera, Beatriz
    1978 “Where Does the Sociolinguistic Variable Stop?” Language in Society7 (2): 171–182. 10.1017/S0047404500005510
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500005510 [Google Scholar]
27. Levin, Beth
    1993 English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Perek, Florent
    2015 Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.17
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.17 [Google Scholar]
29. Pijpops, Dirk
    2019 “How, Why and Where Does Argument Structure Vary?” Ph.D Dissertation, University of Leuven.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Pijpops, Dirk , and Dirk Speelman
    2017 “Alternating Argument Constructions of Dutch Psychological Verbs.” Folia Linguistica51 (1): 207–251. 10.1515/flin‑2017‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2017-0006 [Google Scholar]
31. Pijpops, Dirk , and Freek Van de Velde
    2018 “A Multivariate Analysis of the Partitive Genitive in Dutch.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory14 (1): 99–131. 10.1515/cllt‑2013‑0027
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2013-0027 [Google Scholar]
32. Röthlisberger, Melanie
    2018a “Guidelines for the Dative Alternation.” Available at melanie-roethlisberger.ch/data/.
33. Röthlisberger, Melanie
    2018b “Regional Variation in Probabilistic Grammars: A Multifactorial Study of the English Dative Alternation.” PhD dissertation, University of Leuven.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt , Douglas Biber , Jesse Egbert , and Karlien Franco
    2016a “Toward More Accountability: Modeling Ternary Genitive Variation in Late Modern English.” Language Variation and Change28 (1): 1–29. 10.1017/S0954394515000198
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394515000198 [Google Scholar]
35. Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt , Jason Grafmiller , Benedikt Heller , and Melanie Röthlisberger
    2016b “Around the World in Three Alternations: Modeling Syntactic Variation in Varieties of English.” English World-Wide37 (2): 109–137. 10.1075/eww.37.2.01szm
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.37.2.01szm [Google Scholar]
36. Tagliamonte, Sali
    2012 Variationist Sociolinguistics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Thompson, Sandra Annear , and Anthony Mulac
    1991 “A Quantitative Perspective on the Grammaticization of Epistemic Parentheticals in English.” InGrammaticalization, ed. by Elizabeth Closs Traugott , and Bernd Heine , 313–339. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.19.2.16tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.2.16tho [Google Scholar]
38. Van de Velde, Freek , Katrien Beuls , Isabeau De Smet , and Dirk Pijpops
    2017 “The Weakening of Strong Preterites in West-Germanic.” Paper presented at A Germanic Sandwich, 5th edn., University of Münster, 17 – 18 March 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Van de Velde, Freek , Karlien Franco , and Dirk Geeraerts
    2019 “Reality check voor de kwantitatieve Nederlandse taalkunde [A reality check for quantitative Dutch linguistics]”. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde135 (4): 329–343.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Verhagen, Arie
    2013 “Darwin en de ideale taalgebruiker” [Darwin and the ideal language user]. InHonderd Jaar Taalwetenschap. Artikelen aangeboden aan Saskia Daalder bij haar afscheid van de Vrije Universiteit [100 years of Linguistics. Articles offered to Saskia Daalder on the occasion of her retirement at the Vrije Universiteit], ed. by Theo Janssen , and Jan Noordegraaf , 151–162. Amsterdam: Stichting Neerlandistiek VU/Münster: /Nodus Publikationen.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Wallis, Sean
    2012 “That Vexed Problem of Choice.” Paper presented atICAME33, University of Leuven, 30 May – 3 June 2012. Typescript available at www.ucl.ac.uk/english-usage/statspapers/vexedchoice.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Zehentner, Eva , and Elizabeth Closs Traugott
    2020 “Constructional Networks and the Development of Benefactive Ditransitives in English.” InNodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar, ed. by Lotte Sommerer , and Elena Smirnova , 168–211. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.27.05zeh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.27.05zeh [Google Scholar]
43. Zuidema, Willem , and Arie Verhagen
    2010 “What Are the Unique Design Features of Language? Formal Tools for Comparative Claims.” Adaptive Behavior18 (1): 48–65. 10.1177/1059712309350973
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712309350973 [Google Scholar]