Strong resultative constructions in Romance between usage and norm

References

1. Bates, Elisabeth , Cristina Burani , Simona D’Amico , and Laura Barca
   2001 “Word Reading and Picture Naming in Italian.” Memory & Cognition29 (7): 986–999. 10.3758/BF03195761
   https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195761 [Google Scholar]
2. Beavers, John
   2010 “The Structure of Lexical Meaning: Why Semantics Really Matters.” Language86 (4): 821–864. 10.1353/lan.2010.0040
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0040 [Google Scholar]
3. Beavers, John , Beth Levin , and Shiao Wei Tham
   2010 “The Typology of Motion Expressions Revisited.” Journal of Linguistics46 (2): 331–377. 10.1017/S0022226709990272
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226709990272 [Google Scholar]
4. Benincà, Paola , and Cecilia Poletto
   2005 “Phrasal Verbs in Venetan and Regional Italian.” InLanguage Variation – European Perspectives. Selected papers from the Third International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 3), ed. by Frans L. Hinskens , 9–22. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/silv.1.02ben
   https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.1.02ben [Google Scholar]
5. Bertinetto, Pier M.
   1986 Tempo, aspetto e azione nel verbo italiano [Tense, aspect and actionality in the Italian verb]. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bertinetto, Pier M. , and Denis Delfitto
   2000 “Aspect vs. Actionality: Some Reasons for Keeping Them Apart.” InTense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, ed. by Östen Dahl , 189–225. Berlin: Mouton – De Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Boas, Hans
   2003 A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Broccias, Cristiano
   2003 The English Change Network. Forcing Changes into Schemas. Berlin: Mouton – De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110901207
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110901207 [Google Scholar]
9. Broccias, Cristiano
   2004 “The Cognitive Basis of Adjectival and Adverbial Resultative Constructions.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics2 (1): 103–126. 10.1075/arcl.2.04bro
   https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.2.04bro [Google Scholar]
10. Bybee, Joan
    2010 Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
11. Croft, William , Barðdal Jóhanna , Willem Hollmann , Violeta Sotirova , and Chiaki Taoka
    2010 “Revising Talmy’s Typological Classification of Complex Event Constructions.” InContrastive Studies in Construction Grammar, ed. by Hans Boas : 201–236. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.10.09cro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.10.09cro [Google Scholar]
12. Dowty, David R.
    1979 Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑9473‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7 [Google Scholar]
13. Folli, Raffaella
    2001 “Two Strategies to Construct Telicity: a Comparative Analysis of English and Italian.” Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics6: 47–66.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Folli, Raffaella , and Gillian Rachmand
    2005 “Prepositions and Results in Italian and English: an Analysis from Event Decomposition.” InPerspectives on Aspect, ed. by Henk Verkuyl , Angeliek van Hout , and Henriëtte de Swart , 81–105. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑3232‑3_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3232-3_5 [Google Scholar]
15. Folli, Raffaella , and Heidi Harley
    2004 “Consuming Results in Italian & English: Flavours of V.” InAspectual Inquiries, ed. by Roumyana Slabakova , and Paula Kempchinsky , 95–120. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Iacobini, Claudio
    2012 “Grammaticalization and Innovation in the Encoding of Motion Events.” Folia Linguistica46 (2): 359–385. 10.1515/flin.2012.013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2012.013 [Google Scholar]
17. Iacobini, Claudio , and Francesca Masini
    2009 “I verbi sintagmatici dell’italiano tra innovazione e persistenza: il ruolo dei dialetti Phrasal verbs in Italian between innovation and persistence: The role of dialects].” InItaliano, italiani regionali e dialetti, ed. by Paola Benincà , Paolo Chinellato , Patrizia Cordin , Verner Egerland , Claudio Iacobini , Francesca Masini , Nicoletta Penello , Cecilia Poletto , and Anna Vera Sullam , 115–135. Milano: Franco Angeli.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Krifka, Manfred
    1998 “The Origins of Telicity.” InEvents and Grammar, ed. by Susan Rothstein , 197–235. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑3969‑4_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3969-4_9 [Google Scholar]
19. Levin, Beth , and Malka Rappaport Hovav
    1995 Unaccusativity. at the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge/London: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Mateu, Jaume
    2000 “Why Can’t We Wipe the Slate Clean? A Lexical-Syntactic Approach to Resultative Constructions.” Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics8: 71–95.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Métairy, Justine , Peter Lauwers , Renata Enghels , Miriam Taverniers , and Marleen Van Peteghem
    2020 “A Micro-Typological Perspective on Resultative Secondary Predicates: the Case of Nomination Verb Constructions.” Language Sciences, 78: 1–18. 10.1016/j.langsci.2019.101253
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2019.101253 [Google Scholar]
22. Morita, Chigusa
    2009 “A Crosslinguistic Observation of Resultative Constructions.” Linguistic Research25: 43–55.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Napoli, Donna J.
    1992 “Secondary Resultative Predicates in Italian.” Journal of Linguistics28 (1): 53–90. 10.1017/S0022226700014997
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700014997 [Google Scholar]
24. Riccio, Anna
    2018 “The Syntax-Semantic Interface in Italian Result-Oriented Argument Structures.” InApplying and Expanding Role and Reference Grammar, ed. by Rolf Kailuweit , Lisann Künkel , and Eva Staudinger , 175–188. Freiburg: FRIAS.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Romagno, Domenica
    2015 “Telicità inerente e telicità configurazionale: l’uso del clitico dativo in alcune varietà dialettali della Calabria settentrionale [Inherent and compositional telicity: The use of the dative clitic pronoun in some dialectal varieties of Northern Calabria].” L’Italia Dialettale76: 163–179.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Romagno, Domenica
    2020 “Ancora sull’uso del clitico dativo in alcune varietà dialettali della provincia di Cosenza. Fra semantica di interfaccia e gerarchia di possesso [Further investigations into the use of the dative clitic pronoun in some dialectal varieties of the area of Cosenza: Between interface semantics and possession].” Lingua e Stile55: 125–152.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Rothstein, Susan
    1979 “The Syntactic Forms of Predication.” PhD dissertation, MIT.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Simone, Raffaele
    2008 “Coefficienti verbali nei nomi [Verbal coefficients in nouns].” InCategorie del verbo diacronia, teoria, tipologia. Atti del XXXI Convegno della Società Italiana di Glottologia (Pisa, 26–28 ottobre 2006), ed. by Pier M. Bertinetto , Valentina Bambini , Cristina Bertoncin , and Margherita Farina , 83–113. Roma: il Calamo.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Simpson, Jane
    1983 “Resultatives.” InPapers in Lexical-Functional Grammar, ed. by Beth Levin , Malka Rappaport Hovav , and Annie Zaenen , 143–157. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Talmy, Leonard
    1975 “Semantics and Syntax of Motion.” InSyntax and Semantics 4, ed. by John P. Kimball , 181–238. New York: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368828_008
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368828_008 [Google Scholar]
31. Talmy, Leonard
    1985 “Lexicalization Patterns: Semantic Structure in Lexical Forms.” InLanguage Typology and Syntactic Description. Volume 3, ed. by Timothy Shopen , 57–149. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Talmy, Leonard
    1991 “Path to Realization – via Aspect and Result.” InProceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. by Laurel Sutton , Christopher Johnson , and Ruth Shields , 480–519. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Tenny, Carol L.
    1994 Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑1150‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1150-8 [Google Scholar]
34. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs , and Graeme Trousdale
    2010 “Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization: How Do They Intersect?” InGradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization, ed. by Elizabeth Closs Traugott , and Graeme Trousdale , 19–44. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.90.04tra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.90.04tra [Google Scholar]
35. Van Valin, Robert D.
    2005 Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511610578
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610578 [Google Scholar]
36. Van Valin, Robert D. , and Randy J. LaPolla
    1997 Syntax: Structure, Meaning & Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166799
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799 [Google Scholar]
37. Vendler, Zeno
    1967 Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 10.7591/9781501743726
    https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501743726 [Google Scholar]
38. Washio, Ryuichi
    1997 “Resultatives, Compositionality, and Language Variation.” Journal of East Asian Linguistics6: 1–49. 10.1023/A:1008257704110
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008257704110 [Google Scholar]