How the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model might enrich Diachronic Construction Grammar

References

1. Barðdal, Jóhanna , Elena Smirnova , Lotte Sommerer , and Spike Gildea
   eds. 2015 Diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.18
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18 [Google Scholar]
2. Bieler, Ludwig
   (ed.) 1957 Anicii manlii severini boethii philosophiae consolatio. Turnholti: Brepols.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Boas, Hans C. , and Steffen Höder
   (eds) 2018 Constructions in Contact: Constructional Perspectives on Contact Phenomena in Germanic Languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.24
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.24 [Google Scholar]
4. Boethius H. R. James
   Boethius 1897 The Consolation of Philosophy of Boethius. ( H. R. James , Trans.). London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bolinger, Dwight
   1987 “The Remarkable Double IS.” English Today3 (1): 39–40. 10.1017/S0266078400002728
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078400002728 [Google Scholar]
6. Brenier, Jason M. , and Laura A. Michaelis
   2005 “Optimization via Syntactic Amalgam: Syntax-Prosody Mismatch and Copula Doubling.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory1 (1): 45–88. 10.1515/cllt.2005.1.1.45
   https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2005.1.1.45 [Google Scholar]
7. Cropp, Glynnis M.
   (ed.) 2006 Le livre de Boece de consolacion. Genève: Droz.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Curzan, Anne
   2012 “Revisiting the Reduplicative Copula with Corpus-Based Evidence.” InThe Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ed. by Terttu Nevalainen , and Elizabeth Closs Traugott , 211–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Davies, Mark
   2008– The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 560 Million Words, 1990-Present. Available Online athttps://corpus.byu.edu/coca/
   [Google Scholar]
10. De Smet, Hendrik
    2012 Spreading Patterns: Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199812752.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199812752.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
11. Delahunty, Gerald P.
    2012 “An Analysis of The Thing Is That S Sentences.” Pragmatics22 (1): 41–78. 10.1075/prag.22.1.02del
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.22.1.02del [Google Scholar]
12. Gregersen, Sune
    2018 “Some (Critical) Questions for Diachronic Construction Grammar.” Folia Linguistica52 (s39-2): 341–360. 10.1515/flih‑2018‑0012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flih-2018-0012 [Google Scholar]
13. Keizer, Evelien
    2013 “The X Is (Is) Construction: An FDG Account.” InCasebook in Functional Discourse Grammar, ed. by Lachlan Mackenzie and Hella Olbertz , 213–248. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.137.09kei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.137.09kei [Google Scholar]
14. Mantlik, Annette
    2011 The Historical Development of Shell Nouns: A Diachronic Study of Abstract Noun Constructions in English. PhD dissertation, LMU Munich.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Mantlik, Annette , and Hans-Jörg Schmid
    2018 “ That-Complementiser Omission in N+BE+That-Clauses: Register Variation or Constructional Change?” InThe Noun Phrase in English: Past and Present, ed. by Alex Ho-Cheong Leung , and Wim Van der Wurff , 187–222. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.246.07man
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.246.07man [Google Scholar]
16. Schmid, Hans-Jörg
    2000 English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110808704
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808704 [Google Scholar]
17. Schmid, Hans-Jörg
    2020 The Dynamics of the Linguistic System: Usage, Conventionalization, and Entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198814771.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198814771.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
18. Schmid, Hans-Jörg , and Annette Mantlik
    2015 “Entrenchment in Historical Corpora? Reconstructing Dead Authors’ Minds from Their Usage Profiles.” Anglia133 (4): 583–623. 10.1515/ang‑2015‑0056
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ang-2015-0056 [Google Scholar]
19. Shibasaki, Reijirou
    2015 “On the Grammaticalization of The Thing Is and Related Issues in the History of American English.” InStudies in the History of the English LanguageVI, ed. by Michael Adams , Laurel J. Brinton , and R. D. Fulk , 99–122. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Stvan, Laurel Smith
    2014 “Truth Is, Sentence-Initial Shell Nouns Are Showing up Bare.” InComplex Visibles Out There. Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium 2014: Language Use and Linguistic Structure, ed. by Ludmila Veselovská , and Markéta Janebová , 591–606. Olomouc: Palacký University.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs , and Graeme Trousdale
    2013 Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
22. Tuggy, David
    1996 “The Thing Is Is That People Talk That Way. The Question Is Is Why?” InCognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods: The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics, ed. by Eugene H. Casad , 713–752. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110811421.713
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110811421.713 [Google Scholar]
23. Zimmer, Ben
    2011 “The Elusive Triple ‘Is’.” https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=3452 (last accessed11.08.2020)