1887
Volume 34, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0774-5141
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9676
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Explanations of language change in terms of Diachronic Construction Grammar generalize over gradual adaptations of the linguistic behaviour of individual speakers and communities. Presenting a diachronic case study of the pattern () (Adj) (clause) () (), I argue that the time course of formal, semantic and pragmatic changes, of changes in frequency and of changes regarding dispersion over speakers and choices of lexical items offer a glimpse of the gradual individual and communal adaptations underlying processes such as constructionalization and constructional change. I interpret data extracted from various corpora from the perspectives of Diachronic Construction Grammar and the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model (Schmid 2020) and discuss how the latter perspective might enrich the former.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00055.sch
2020-12-31
2021-07-31
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barðdal, Jóhanna , Elena Smirnova , Lotte Sommerer , and Spike Gildea
    eds. 2015Diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bieler, Ludwig
    (ed.) 1957Anicii manlii severini boethii philosophiae consolatio. Turnholti: Brepols.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Boas, Hans C. , and Steffen Höder
    (eds) 2018Constructions in Contact: Constructional Perspectives on Contact Phenomena in Germanic Languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.24
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.24 [Google Scholar]
  4. Boethius
    Boethius 1897The Consolation of Philosophy of Boethius. ( H. R. James , Trans.). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bolinger, Dwight
    1987 “The Remarkable Double IS.” English Today3 (1): 39–40. 10.1017/S0266078400002728
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078400002728 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brenier, Jason M. , and Laura A. Michaelis
    2005 “Optimization via Syntactic Amalgam: Syntax-Prosody Mismatch and Copula Doubling.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory1 (1): 45–88. 10.1515/cllt.2005.1.1.45
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2005.1.1.45 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cropp, Glynnis M.
    (ed.) 2006Le livre de Boece de consolacion. Genève: Droz.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Curzan, Anne
    2012 “Revisiting the Reduplicative Copula with Corpus-Based Evidence.” InThe Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ed. by Terttu Nevalainen , and Elizabeth Closs Traugott , 211–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Davies, Mark
    2008–The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 560 Million Words, 1990-Present. Available Online athttps://corpus.byu.edu/coca/
    [Google Scholar]
  10. De Smet, Hendrik
    2012Spreading Patterns: Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199812752.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199812752.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Delahunty, Gerald P.
    2012 “An Analysis of The Thing Is That S Sentences.” Pragmatics22 (1): 41–78. 10.1075/prag.22.1.02del
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.22.1.02del [Google Scholar]
  12. Gregersen, Sune
    2018 “Some (Critical) Questions for Diachronic Construction Grammar.” Folia Linguistica52 (s39-2): 341–360. 10.1515/flih‑2018‑0012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flih-2018-0012 [Google Scholar]
  13. Keizer, Evelien
    2013 “The X Is (Is) Construction: An FDG Account.” InCasebook in Functional Discourse Grammar, ed. by Lachlan Mackenzie and Hella Olbertz , 213–248. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.137.09kei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.137.09kei [Google Scholar]
  14. Mantlik, Annette
    2011 The Historical Development of Shell Nouns: A Diachronic Study of Abstract Noun Constructions in English. PhD dissertation, LMU Munich.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Mantlik, Annette , and Hans-Jörg Schmid
    2018 “ That-Complementiser Omission in N+BE+That-Clauses: Register Variation or Constructional Change?” InThe Noun Phrase in English: Past and Present, ed. by Alex Ho-Cheong Leung , and Wim Van der Wurff , 187–222. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.246.07man
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.246.07man [Google Scholar]
  16. Schmid, Hans-Jörg
    2000English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110808704
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808704 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2020The Dynamics of the Linguistic System: Usage, Conventionalization, and Entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198814771.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198814771.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Schmid, Hans-Jörg , and Annette Mantlik
    2015 “Entrenchment in Historical Corpora? Reconstructing Dead Authors’ Minds from Their Usage Profiles.” Anglia133 (4): 583–623. 10.1515/ang‑2015‑0056
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ang-2015-0056 [Google Scholar]
  19. Shibasaki, Reijirou
    2015 “On the Grammaticalization of The Thing Is and Related Issues in the History of American English.” InStudies in the History of the English LanguageVI, ed. by Michael Adams , Laurel J. Brinton , and R. D. Fulk , 99–122. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Stvan, Laurel Smith
    2014 “Truth Is, Sentence-Initial Shell Nouns Are Showing up Bare.” InComplex Visibles Out There. Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium 2014: Language Use and Linguistic Structure, ed. by Ludmila Veselovská , and Markéta Janebová , 591–606. Olomouc: Palacký University.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs , and Graeme Trousdale
    2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Tuggy, David
    1996 “The Thing Is Is That People Talk That Way. The Question Is Is Why?” InCognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods: The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics, ed. by Eugene H. Casad , 713–752. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110811421.713
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110811421.713 [Google Scholar]
  23. Zimmer, Ben
    2011 “The Elusive Triple ‘Is’.” https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=3452 (last accessed11.08.2020)
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00055.sch
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00055.sch
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error