Delineating extravagance

References

1. Bryer, Jason
   2019 likert: Analysis and Visualization of Likert Items. R-script available at github.com/jbryer/likert (last checked21/10/2020)
2. Dahl, Östen
   2001 “Inflationary Effects in Language and Elsewhere.” InFrequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, ed. by Joan L. Bybee , and Paul J. Hopper , 471–480. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.45.24dah
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.24dah [Google Scholar]
3. d’Avis, Franz , and Rita Finkbeiner
   (eds) 2019 Expressivität im Deutschen. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
4. De Wit, Astrid , Peter Petré , and Frank Brisard
   2020 “Standing out with the Progressive.” Journal of Linguistics56 (3): 479–514. 10.1017/S0022226719000501
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226719000501 [Google Scholar]
5. Detges, Ulrich , and Richard Waltereit
   2002 “Grammaticalization vs. Reanalysis: a Semantic-Pragmatic Account of Functional Change in Grammar.” Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft21 (2). 151–195. 10.1515/zfsw.2002.21.2.151
   https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsw.2002.21.2.151 [Google Scholar]
6. Drummond, Alex D.
   2020 Ibex Farm. Available at https://spellout.net/ibexfarm (last checked21/10/2020)
7. Eitelmann, Matthias , and Dagmar Haumann
   eds. In prep.Extravagant Morphology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Günther, Christine , Sven Kotowski , and Ingo Plag
   2020 “Phrasal Compounds Can Have Adjectival Heads: Evidence from English.” English Language and Linguistics24 (1): 75–95. 10.1017/S1360674318000229
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674318000229 [Google Scholar]
9. Haspelmath, Martin
   1999 “Why Is Grammaticalization Irreversible?” Linguistics37 (6): 1043–1068. 10.1515/ling.37.6.1043
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.37.6.1043 [Google Scholar]
10. Hein, Katrin
    2017 “Modeling the Properties of German Phrasal Compounds within a Usage-Based Constructional Approach.” InFurther Investigations into the Nature of Phrasal Compounding, ed. by Carola Trips , and Jaklin Kornfilt , 119–148. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Ishiyama, Osamu
    2014 “The Nature of Speaker Creativity in Linguistic Innovation.” InUsage-Based Approaches to Language Change, ed. by Evie Coussé , and Ferdinand von Mengden , 147–166. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sfsl.69.06ish
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.69.06ish [Google Scholar]
12. Keller, Rudi
    1994 Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Kempf, Luise , and Stefan Hartmann
    2018 “Schema Unification and Morphological Productivity: A Diachronic Perspective.” InThe Construction of Words. Advances in Construction Morphology, ed. by Geert E. Booij , 441–474. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑74394‑3_16
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74394-3_16 [Google Scholar]
14. Kempf, Luise , and Stefan Hartmann
    . forthcoming. “What’s Extravagant about be-sandaled Feet? Morphology, Semantics and Pragmatics of German Pseudo-Participles.” InExtravagant morphology ed. by Matthias Eitelmann , and Dagmar Haumann . Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Lensch, Anke
    2018 “ Fixer-Uppers. Reduplication in the Derivation of Phrasal Verbs.” InExact Repetition in Grammar and Discourse, ed. by Rita Finkbeiner , and Ulrike Freywald , 158–181. Berlin/ Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110592498‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110592498-007 [Google Scholar]
16. Petré, Peter
    2016 “Unidirectionality as a Cycle of Convention and Innovation: Micro-Changes in the Grammaticalization of [be going to INF].” Belgian Journal of Linguistics30: 115–146. 10.1075/bjl.30.06pet
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.30.06pet [Google Scholar]
17. Petré, Peter
    2017 “The Extravagant Progressive: An Experimental Corpus Study on the History of Emphatic [be Ving].” English Language and Linguistics21 (2): 227–250. 10.1017/S1360674317000107
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674317000107 [Google Scholar]
18. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2020 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Manual. Vienna, Austria.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Schmid, Hans-Jörg
    2020 The Dynamics of the Linguistic System: Usage, Conventionalization, and Entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198814771.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198814771.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
20. Schmid, Hans-Jörg , and Franziska Günther
    2016 “Toward a Unified Socio-Cognitive Framework for Salience in Language.” Frontiers in Psychology7. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01110
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01110 [Google Scholar]
21. Ungerer, Tobias , and Stefan Hartmann
    2020 “Attack of the Snowclones: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Extravagant Formulaic Patterns.” Paper presented at theUK Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Birmingham, July 27–29.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Zima, Elisabeth , and Geert Brône
    2015 “Cognitive Linguistics and Interactional Discourse: Time to Enter into Dialogue.” Language and Cognition7 (4): 485–498. 10.1017/langcog.2015.19
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2015.19 [Google Scholar]
23. Zwicky, Arnold M. , and Geoffrey K. Pullum
    1987 “Plain Morphology and Expressive Morphology.” Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society13: 330–340. 10.3765/bls.v13i0.1817
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v13i0.1817 [Google Scholar]