Making good on a promise

References

1. Barðdal, Jóhanna
   2009 “The Development of Case in Germanic.” InThe Role of Semantic, Pragmatic, and Discourse Factors in the Development of Case, ed. by Jóhanna Barðdal , and Shobhana L. Chelliah , 123–159. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.108.09bar
   https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.108.09bar [Google Scholar]
2. Blake, Barry J.
   1983 “Structure and Word Order in Kalkatungu: The Anatomy of a Flat Language.” Australian Journal of Linguistics3(2): 143–175. 10.1080/07268608308599307
   https://doi.org/10.1080/07268608308599307 [Google Scholar]
3. Bod, Rens
   2009 “Constructions at Work or at Rest?” Cognitive Linguistics20(1): 129–134. 10.1515/COGL.2009.006
   https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2009.006 [Google Scholar]
4. Chomsky, Noam
   1957 Syntactic Structures. The Hague/Paris: Mouton. 10.1515/9783112316009
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009 [Google Scholar]
5. Chomsky, Noam
   1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. The Pisa Lectures. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Croft, William
   2001 Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
7. Croft, William
   2003 “Lexical Rules vs Constructions: A False Dichotomy.” InMotivation in Language Studies: Studies in Honour of Günter Radden, ed. by Hubert Cuyckens , Thomas Berg , René Dirven , and Klaus-Uwe Panther , 49–68. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.243.07cro
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.243.07cro [Google Scholar]
8. Croft, William
   2010 “Ten Unwarranted Assumptions in Syntactic Argumentation.” InLanguage Usage and Language Structure, ed. by Kasper Boye , and Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen , 313–350. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Dik, Simon
   1997 The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 1: The Structure of the Clause. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Drach, Erich
    1937 Grundgedanken der deutschen Satzlehre. Frankfurt am Main: Diesterweg.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Evans, Nicholas , and Stephen C. Levinson
    2009 “The Myth of Language Universals: Language Diversity and Its Importance for Cognitive Science.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences32: 429–492. 10.1017/S0140525X0999094X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999094X [Google Scholar]
12. Fillmore, Charles J. , Kay, Paul , and Mary Catherine O’Connor
    1988 “Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone .” Language64(3): 501–538. 10.2307/414531
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414531 [Google Scholar]
13. Fried, Mirjam , and Jan-Ola Östman
    2004 “Construction Grammar: A Thumbnail Sketch.” InConstruction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective, ed. by Mirjam Fried , and Jan-Ola Östman , 11–86. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.2.02fri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.2.02fri [Google Scholar]
14. Gil, David
    2013 “Riau Indonesian: A Language Without Nouns and Verbs.” InFlexible Word Classes. Typological Studies of Underspecified Parts of Speech, ed. by Jan Rijkhoff , and Eva van Lier , 89–130. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668441.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668441.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
15. Goldberg, Adele E.
    2013 “Argument Structure Constructions Versus Lexical Rules or Derivational Verb Templates.” Mind & Language28(4): 435–465. 10.1111/mila.12026
    https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12026 [Google Scholar]
16. Hale, Kenneth
    1983 “Warlpiri and the Grammar of Non-Configurational Languages.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory1(1): 5–74. 10.1007/BF00210374
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00210374 [Google Scholar]
17. Haspelmath, Martin
    2009 “Framework-Free Grammatical Theory.” The Oxford Handbook of Grammatical Analysis, ed. by Bernd Heine , and Heiko Narrog , 341–365. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0014
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0014 [Google Scholar]
18. Lichte, Timm , and Laura Kallmeyer
    2017 “Tree-Adjoining Grammar: A Tree-Based Constructionist Grammar Framework for Natural Language Understanding.” In: The AAAI 2017 Spring Symposium on Computational Construction Grammar and Natural Language Understanding: Technical Report SS-17-02, 205–212. Stanford: AAAI Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Micelli, Vanessa
    2012 “Field Topology and Information Structure: A Case Study for German Constituent Order.” Computational Issues in Fluid Construction Grammar, ed. by Luc Steels , 178–211. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑34120‑5_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34120-5_8 [Google Scholar]
20. Michaelis, Laura A.
    2009 “Sign-Based Construction Grammar.” The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, ed. by Bernd Heine , and Heiko Narrog , 155–176. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Müller, Stefan , and Stephen Wechsler
    2014 “Lexical Approaches to Argument Structure.” Theoretical Linguistics40(1–2):1–76. 10.1515/tl‑2014‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2014-0001 [Google Scholar]
22. Nordlinger, Rachel
    1998 A Grammar of Wambaya, Northern Territory (Australia). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Nordlinger, Rachel
    2014 “Constituency and Grammatical Relations in Australian Languages.” InThe Languages of Australia: A Comprehensive Guide, ed. by Harold Koch , and Rachel Nordlinger , 215–261. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110279771.215
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110279771.215 [Google Scholar]
24. Osborne, Timothy , and Thomas Gross
    2012 “Constructions are Catenae: Construction Grammar Meets Dependency Grammar.” Cognitive Linguistics23: 165–216. 10.1515/cog‑2012‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2012-0006 [Google Scholar]
25. Pollard, Carl , and Ivan A. Sag
    1994 Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago/Stanford: University of Chicago Press/CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Sag, Ivan A. , Kaplan, Ronals , Karttunen, Lauri , Kay, Martin , Pollard, Carl , Shieber, Stuart , and Annie Zaenen
    1986 “Unification and Grammatical Theory.” Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 5: 238–254.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Steels, Luc
    2004 “Constructivist Development of Grounded Construction Grammars.” InProceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-04), 9–16. Barcelona: ACL. 10.3115/1218955.1218957
    https://doi.org/10.3115/1218955.1218957 [Google Scholar]
28. Steels, Luc
    (ed.) 2011 Design Patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.11
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.11 [Google Scholar]
29. Steels, Luc
    2017 “The Basics of Fluid Construction Grammar.” Constructions and Frames9(2): 178–225. 10.1075/cf.00002.ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00002.ste [Google Scholar]
30. Tesnière, Lucien
    1959 Eléments de Syntaxe Structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Van de Velde, Freek
    2009 De Nominale Constituent: Structuur en Geschiedenis [The noun phrase: Structure and diachrony]. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. van Trijp, Remi
    2014 “Long-Distance Dependencies Without Filler-Gaps: A Cognitive-Functional Alternative in Fluid Construction Grammar.” Language and Cognition6(2): 242–270. 10.1017/langcog.2014.8
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2014.8 [Google Scholar]
33. Van Valin Jr., Robert D.
    1993 Advances in Role and Reference Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.82
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.82 [Google Scholar]
34. Wells, Rulon S.
    1947 “Immediate Constituents.” Language23(2):81–117. 10.2307/410382
    https://doi.org/10.2307/410382 [Google Scholar]