1887
Volume 36, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0774-5141
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9676

Abstract

Abstract

A large body of research has highlighted the tight, carefully organised temporal coordination of interaction. When taking turns, people tend to minimise the occurrence of gaps and overlaps (Sacks, Schegloff, and Jefferson 1974). Within the field of signed language linguistics, however, there is an ongoing debate: while some researchers claim that signers orient to a ‘one-speaker-at-a-time’ principle (McCleary and Leite 2013) as found in spoken conversation, others argue that signed language interactions allow for more overlapping turns, displaying a more collaborative floor in their turn-taking mechanics (Coates and Sutton-Spence 2001). The current paper aims at contributing to this discussion by providing a first cross-linguistic, systematic account of the manifestation of overlap in two signed languages, namely LSFB (French Belgian Sign Language) and VGT (Flemish Sign Language). We analysed simultaneous signing in 2 hours of dyadic face-to-face conversations. This paper combines a quantitative account of the turn timing and thus frequency counts of overlap in VGT and LSFB interactions with a more fine-grained qualitative analysis of the interactional, i.e., sequential environment, in which overlap occurs and the strategies deployed to accomplish overlap resolution by deaf participants. In doing so, this paper sheds further light on the orderliness of signed conversation, and ultimately contributes to a better understanding of the semiotic complexity of multimodal interaction management across language ecologies (Ferrara and Hodge 2018).

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00076.beu
2023-06-09
2024-07-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/bjl.00076.beu.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00076.beu&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Baker, Anne, and Beppie van den Bogaerde
    2012 “Communicative Interaction.” In: Sign Language. An International Handbook, ed. byRoland Pfau, Markus Steinbach, and Bencie Woll, 489–512. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261325.489
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325.489 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker, Charlotte
    1977 “Regulators and Turn-Taking in American Sign Language Discourse.” InOn the Other Hand, ed. byL. A. Friedman, 215–236. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bavelas, Jannet B., Linda Coates, and Trudy Johnson
    2002 “Listener Responses as Collaborative Process: The Role of Gaze.” Journal of Communication521: 566–580. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2002.tb02562.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02562.x [Google Scholar]
  4. Beukeleers, Inez
    2020 “On the Role of Eye Gaze in Flemish Sign Language: A Multifocal Eye-Tracking Study on the Phenomena of Online Turn-Processing and Depicting.” PhD dissertation, KU Leuven.
  5. Beukeleers, Inez, Geert Brône, and Myriam Vermeerbergen
    2020 “Unaddressed Participants’ Gaze in Flemish Sign Language Interactions: Planning Gaze Shifts after Recognizing an Upcoming (Possible) Turn Completion.” Journal of Pragmatics1621: 62–83. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Casillas, Marissa, Connie de Vos, Onno Crasborn, and Stephen Levinson
    2015 “The Perception of Stroke-to-Stroke Turn Boundaries in Signed Conversation.” In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci), ed. byDavid C. Noelle, Rick Dale, Anne S. Warlaumont, Jeff Yoshimi, Teenie Matlock, Carolyn D. Jennings, and Paul P. Maglio, 315–320. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cibulka, Paul M.
    2016 “On How to Do Things with Holds: Manual Movement Phases as Part of Interactional Practices in Signed Conversation.” Sign Language Studies16(4): 447–472. 10.1353/sls.2016.0015
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2016.0015 [Google Scholar]
  8. Coates, Jennifer, and Rachel Sutton-Spence
    2001 “Turn-Taking Pans in Deaf Conversation.” Journal of Sociolinguistics5(4): 507–529. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00162
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00162 [Google Scholar]
  9. de Vos, Connie, Marissa Casillas, Tijl Uittenbogert, Onno Crasborn, and Stephen C. Levinson
    2022 “Predicting Conversational Turns: Signers’ and Nonsigners’ Sensitivity to Language-Specific and Globally Accessible Cues.” Language98(1): 35–62. 10.1353/lan.2021.0085
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2021.0085 [Google Scholar]
  10. de Vos, Connie, Francisco Torreira, and Stephen C. Levinson
    2015 “Turn-Timing in Signed Conversations: Coordinating Stroke-to-Stroke Turn Boundaries.” Frontiers in Psychology61: 00268. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00268
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00268 [Google Scholar]
  11. Ferrara, Lindsay, and Gabrielle Hodge
    2018 “Language as Description, Indication, and Depiction.” Frontiers in Psychology91: 716. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00716
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00716 [Google Scholar]
  12. FFSB
    FFSB (2017) Rapport d’activités 2017. Technical report, Féderation Francophone des Sourds de Belgique, Bruxelles.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ford, Cecilia, and Sandra Thompson
    1996 “Interactional Units in Conversation: Syntactic, Intonational and Pragmatic Resources for the Management of Turns.” InInteraction and grammar, ed. byElinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra Thompson, 134–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.003 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gabarró-López, Sylvia, and Anna Kudder
    . this volume. “A Corpus-Based Study of the “Away Gestures” across Four Signed Languages: DGS, LSC, LSFB and PJM.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics 36 (Semiotic Diversity of Signed Languages, special issue ed. by Alysson Lepeut, and Inez Beukeleers).
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Girard-Groeber, Simone
    2015 “The Management of Turn Transition in Signed Interaction through the Lens of Overlaps.” Frontiers in Pyschology61: 741. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00741
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00741 [Google Scholar]
  16. Groeber, Simone, and Evelynne Pochon-Berger
    2014 “Turns and Turn-Taking in Sign Language Interaction: A Study of Turn-Final Holds.” Journal of Pragmatics651: 121–136. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.012 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hayashi, Makoto
    2013 “Turn Allocation and Turn Sharing.” InHandbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. byTanja Stivers, and Jack Sidnell, 167–190. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Jefferson, Gail
    1984 “Notes on Some Orderliness of Overlap Onset.” InDiscourse Analysis and Natural Rhetoric, ed. byValentina D’Urso, and Paolo Leonardi, 11–38. Padua: Cleup Editore.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnston, Trevor
    2010 Auslan Corpus Annotation Guidelines. Centre for Language Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kendon, Adam
    2004Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kita, Sotaro, Ingeborg van Gijn, and Harry van der Hulst
    1998 “Movement Phases in Signs and Co-Speech Gestures, and Their Transcription by Human Coders.” InGesture and Sign Language in Human-Computer Interaction, ed. byIpke Wachsmuth, and Martin Fröhlichn, 23–35. London: Springer-Verlag. 10.1007/BFb0052986
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0052986 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lackner, Andrea
    2009 “Turn-taking und Dialogstruktur in der Österreichischen Gebärdensprache. Eine Gesprächsanalyse der Salzburger Variante [Turn-taking and the structure of dyadic conversations in Austrian Sign Language. An analysis of a conversation in the variant from Salzburg].” Das Zeichen811: 90–104.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lepeut, Alysson
    2022 “When Hands Stop Moving, Interaction Keeps Going: A Study of Holds in the Management of LSFB and Spoken French Interactions.” Languages in Contrast22(2): 290–321. 10.1075/lic.00021.lep
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.00021.lep [Google Scholar]
  24. Lepeut, Alysson, Clara Lombart, Sébastien Vandenitte, and Laurence Meurant
    . Under Review. “Spoken and Sign Languages Hand in Hand: Building and Using Parallel and Directly Comparable Corpora of LSFB and Belgian French.” Corpora.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lepeut, Alysson, and Emily Shaw
    2022 “Time is Ripe to Make Interactional Moves: Bringing Evidence from Four Languages across Modalities.” Frontiers in Communication71: 780124. 10.3389/fcomm.2022.780124
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.780124 [Google Scholar]
  26. Levinson, Stephen, and Francisco Torreira
    2015 “Timing in Turn-Taking and its Implications for Processing Models of Language.” Frontiers in Psychology61: 731. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00731
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00731 [Google Scholar]
  27. Loots, Gerrit, Isabel Devisé, Guido Lichtert, Nathalie Hoebrechts, Carine Van De Ginste, and Ingrid De Bruyne
    2003De gemeenschap van doven en slechthorenden in Vlaanderen. Communicatie, taal en verwachtingen omtrent maatschappelijke toegankelijkheid [The community of deaf and hard of hearing people in Flanders. Communication, language and expectations about societal accessibility]. Gent-Academia Press/Fevlado-Diversus.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. McCleary, Leland E., and Tarcisio D. A. Leite
    2013 “Turn-Taking in Brazilian Sign Language: Evidence from Overlap”. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders4(1): 123–154. 10.1558/jircd.v4i1.123
    https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.v4i1.123 [Google Scholar]
  29. Meurant, Laurence
    2015 Corpus LSFB. First digital open access corpus of movies and annotations of French Belgian Sign Language (LSFB). www.corpus-lsfb.be
  30. Mondada, Lorenza
    2006 “Participants’ Online Analysis and Multimodal Practices: Projecting the End of the Turn and the Closing of the Sequence.” Discourse Studies8(1): 117–129. 10.1177/1461445606059561
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059561 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2007 “Multimodal Resources for Turn-Taking: Pointing and the Emergence of Possible Next Speakers.” Discourse Studies9(2): 194–225. 10.1177/1461445607075346
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607075346 [Google Scholar]
  32. Rossano, Federico
    2012 “Gaze Behavior in Face-to-Face Interaction.” PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.
  33. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation”. Language50(4): 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  34. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1996 “Turn Organisation: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” InGrammar and Interaction, ed. byElino Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra Thompson, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002 [Google Scholar]
  35. 2000 “Overlapping Talk and the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language in Society29(1): 1–63. 10.1017/S0047404500001019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500001019 [Google Scholar]
  36. Stivers, Tania, Nick J. Enfield, Penelope Brown, Christina Englert, Makoto Hayashi, Trine Heinemann, Gertie Hoymann, Federico Rossano, Jan-Peter De Ruiter, Kyung-Eun Yoon, and Stephen C. Levinson
    2009 “Universals and Cultural Variation in Turn-Taking in Conversation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America106(26): 10587–10592. 10.1073/pnas.0903616106
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903616106 [Google Scholar]
  37. Stivers, Tania, and Federico Rossano
    2010 “Mobilizing Response”. Research on Language and Social Interaction43(1): 3–31. 10.1080/08351810903471258
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810903471258 [Google Scholar]
  38. Stokoe, William
    1960Sign Language Structure: An Outline of the Visual Communication Systems of the American Deaf (Studies in Linguistics, Occasional papers 8). Buffalo, New York: University of Buffalo.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Tervoort, Bernard T. M.
    1953 “Structural Analysis of Visual Language Use in a Group of Deaf Children.” PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
  40. Tolins, Jackson, and Jean E. Fox Tree
    2014 “Addressee Backchannels Steer Narrative Development.” InJournal of Pragmatics701: 152–164. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.06.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.06.006 [Google Scholar]
  41. Van Hecke, Eline, and Kristof De Weerdt
    2004 “Regional Variation in Flemish Sign Language.” InTo the Lexicon and beyond: Sociolinguistics in European Deaf Communities, ed. byMieke Van Herreweghe, and Myriam Vermeerbergen, 27–38. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Van Herreweghe, Mieke, and Myriam Vermeerbergen
    2009 “Flemish Sign Language Standardization.” Current Issues in Language Planning10(3): 308–326. 10.1080/14664200903154874
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664200903154874 [Google Scholar]
  43. Van Herreweghe, Mieke, Myriam Vermeerbergen, Eline Demey, Hannes De Durpel, Hilde Nyffels, and Sam Verstraete
    2015 Het Corpus VGT. Een digitaal open access corpus van video’s en annotaties van Vlaamse Gebarentaal [The Corpus VGT. A digital open access corpus of videos and annotations of Flemish Sign Language]. www.corpusvgt.be
  44. Vermeerbergen, Myriam
    2006 “Past and Current Trends in Sign Language Research.” Language and Communication26(2): 168–192. 10.1016/j.langcom.2005.10.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2005.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  45. Vermeerbergen, Myriam, and Anna-Lena Nilsson
    2018 “Introduction.” In: A Bibliography of Sign Languages 2008–2017, ed. byAnne Aarssen, René Genis, and Eline van der Veken, 9–31. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Wille, Beatrijs, Inez Beukeleers, Mieke Van Herreweghe, and Myriam Vermeerbergen
    2022 “Big Things often Have Small Beginnings: A Review on the Development, Use and Value of Small and Big Corpora for Flemish Sign Language Linguistic Research”. Frontiers in Psychology121: 779479. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.779479
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.779479 [Google Scholar]
  47. Wittenburg, Peter, Hennie Brugman, Albert Russel, Alex Klassmann, and Han Sloetjes
    2006 “ELAN: a Professional Framework for Multimodality Research. InProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), ed. byNicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Aldo Gangemi, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Jan Odijk, and Daniel Tapias, 1556–1559. Genoa: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Yasui, Eiko
    2013 “Collaborative Idea Construction: Repetition of Gestures and Talk in Joint Brainstorming”. Journal of Pragmatics461: 157–172. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.002 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00076.beu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/bjl.00076.beu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error