Volume 29 Number 1
  • ISSN 0774-5141
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9676
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra
    2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2007 “Information source and evidentiality: what can we conclude?” Rivista di Linguistica19 (1): 209–227.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson, Lloyd B
    1986 “Evidentials, Paths of Change, and Mental Maps: Typologically Regular symmetries.” InEvidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols , 273–312. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Apresjan, Jurij D
    1995Izbrannye trudy, t. II: Integral’noe opisanie jazyka i sistemnaja leksikografija. [Selected Writings, vol. II: The integrative description of language and systemic lexicography]. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ariel, Mira
    2008Pragmatics and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791314
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791314 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bogusławski, Andrzej
    2008Semantyka, pragmatyka. Leksykografa głos demarkacyjny. [Semantics, pragmatics. A lexicographer’s demarcating voice.] Warsaw. (= Semiosis Lexicographica, vol. XLVIII.)
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Boye, Kasper
    2012Epistemic meaning. A crosslinguistic and functional-cognitive study. Berlin – New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110219036
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219036 [Google Scholar]
  8. Boye, Kasper and Peter Harder
    2009 “Evidentiality: Linguistic categories and grammaticalization.” Functions of Language16 (1): 9–43. doi: 10.1075/fol.16.1.03boy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.1.03boy [Google Scholar]
  9. Chafe, Wallace and Johanna Nichols
    (eds.) 1986Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cornillie, Bert
    2007Epistemic Modality and Evidentiality in Spanish (semi-) auxiliaries. A cognitive-functional Approach. Berlin – New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2008 “On the grammaticalization and (inter)subjectivity of Spanish evidential (semi-)auxiliaries.” InTheoretical and Empirical Issues in Grammaticalization, ed. by Seoane, Elena & María José López Couso , 55–76. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.77.05cor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.77.05cor [Google Scholar]
  12. 2009 “Evidentiality and epistemic modality: On the close relationship between two different categories.” Functions of Language16 (1): 44–62. doi: 10.1075/fol.16.1.04cor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.1.04cor [Google Scholar]
  13. De Haan, Ferdinand
    1999 “Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality: Setting Boundaries.” Southwest Journal of Linguistics18: 83–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Faller, Martina T
    2012 “Evidential Scalar Implicatures.” Linguistics and Philosophy35: 285–312. doi: 10.1007/s10988‑012‑9119‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-012-9119-8 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hart, Chris
    2011 “Legitimising Assertions and the Logico-Rhetorical Module: Evidence and Epistemic Vigilance in Media Discourse on Immigration.” Discourse Studies13 (6): 751–769. doi: 10.1177/1461445611421360
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611421360 [Google Scholar]
  16. Haspelmath, Martin
    2010 “Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies.” Language86 (3): 663–687. doi: 10.1353/lan.2010.0021
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0021 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hengeveld, Kees and J. Lachlan Mackenzie
    2008Functional discourse grammar: a typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hennemann, Anja
    2011 “The epistemic and evidential use of Spanish modal adverbs and verbs of cognitive attitude.” Folia Linguistica46 (1): 133–170.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2013A context-sensitive and functional approach to evidentiality in Spanish or Why evidentiality needs a superordinate category. Frankfurt am Main – Bern: Peter Lang. doi: 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑02066‑3
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-02066-3 [Google Scholar]
  20. Horn, Laurence R
    1972On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English. Ph.D. dissertation. Los Angeles: UCLA.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Huang, Yan
    2007Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. González Condom, Montserrat
    (ed.) 2014Evidential and Epistemic Strategies in Discourse . Special issue of Discourse Studies17 (2).
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Güldemann, Tom
    2008Quotative indexes in African languages: a synchronic and diachronic survey. Berlin – New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110211450
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211450 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kehayov, Petar
    2008 “Interactions between grammatical evidentials and lexical markers of epistemicity and evidentiality: a case study of Bulgarian and Estonian.” InLexikalische Evidenzialitäts-Marker in slavischen Sprachen, ed. by Björn Wiemer and Vladimir A. Plungjan , 165–201. München – Wien: Sagner. (= Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, Sonderband 72.)
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Korta, Kepa and Larraitz Zubeldia
    2014 “The contribution of evidentials to utterance content: Evidence from the Basque reportative particle omen .” Language90 (2): 389–423. doi: 10.1353/lan.2014.0024
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2014.0024 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lampert, Günther and Martina Lampert
    2010 “Where does evidentiality reside? Notes on (alleged) limiting cases: seem and be like.STUF – Language Typology and Universals63 (4): 308–321. doi: 10.1524/stuf.2010.0024
    https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2010.0024 [Google Scholar]
  27. Langacker, Ronald W
    2013 “Modals: Striving for control.” InEnglish Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, ed. by Juana I. Marín-Arrese , Marta Carretero , Jorge Arús and Johan van der Auwera , 3–55. Berlin – New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Levinson, Stephen C
    2007. [1983]: Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Marín Arrese, Juana I
    2015 “Epistemic Legitimisation and Inter/Subjectivity in the Discourse of Parliamentary and Public Inquiries: A contrastive case study.” Critical Discourse Studies12 (3): 261–278. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2015.1013484
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1013484 [Google Scholar]
  30. Nuckolls, Janis and Lev Michael
    (eds). 2012Evidentiality in interaction . Special issue of Pragmatics and Society3 (2).
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Nuyts, Jan
    2001Epistemic Modality. Language, and Conceptualization: A Cognitive-Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.5 [Google Scholar]
  32. Palmer, Frank R
    1986Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 2001Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (revised edition). doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139167178
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167178 [Google Scholar]
  34. Papafragou, Anna , Li, Peggy , Choi, Youngon , and Chung-hye Han
    2007 “Evidentiality in language and cognition.” Cognition103: 253–299. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  35. Plungian, Vladimir A
    2001 “The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space.” Journal of Pragmatics33: 349–357. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(00)00006‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00006-0 [Google Scholar]
  36. 2010 “Types of verbal evidentiality marking: an overview.” InLinguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, ed. by Diewald, Gabriele and Elena Smirnova , 15–58. Berlin – New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Sperber, Dan. , Clément, F. , Heintz, C. , Mascaro, O. , Mercier, H. , Origgi, G. and Wilson, Deirdre
    2010 Epistemic Vigilance. Mind & Language25: 359–393. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.2010.01394.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x [Google Scholar]
  38. Squartini, Mario
    2001 “The internal structure of evidentiality in Romance.” Studies in Language25 (2): 297–334. doi: 10.1075/sl.25.2.05squ
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.25.2.05squ [Google Scholar]
  39. 2007 “Investigating a grammatical category and its lexical correlates.” In Evidentiality between lexicon and grammar, ed. by Mario Squartini , 1–6. Rivista di Linguistica 19 (1).
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 2008 “Lexical vs. grammatical evidentiality in French and Italian.” Linguistics46 (5): 917–947. doi: 10.1515/LING.2008.030
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2008.030 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2009 “Evidentiality, epistemicity and their diachronic connections to non-factuality.” InCurrent Trends in Diachronic Semantics and Pragmatics, ed. by Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen and Jacqueline Visconti , 214–225. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Traugott, Elizabeth C
    2010 “Revisiting subjectification and intersubjectification.” InSubjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, ed. by Kristin Davidse , Lieven Vandelanotte , and Hubert Cuyckens , 29–70. Berlin – New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110226102.1.29
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226102.1.29 [Google Scholar]
  43. Urmson, James O
    1963/1952 “Parenthetical verbs.” InPhilosophy and ordinary language, ed by Charles Caton , 220–240. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. First appeared in Mind in 1952: 480–496.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. von Fintel, Kai and Anthony S Gillies
    2010 “Must… stay… strong!” Natural Language Semantics18 (4): 351–383. doi: 10.1007/s11050‑010‑9058‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-010-9058-2 [Google Scholar]
  45. Wiemer, Björn
    2008 “Lexikalische Markierungen evidenzieller Funktionen: zur Theoriebildung und empirischen Erforschung im Slavischen.” InLexikalische Evidenzialitätsmarker im Slavischen, ed. by Björn Wiemer and Vladimir A. Plungjan , 5–49. München – Wien: Sagner. ( Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, Sonderband 72 .)
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 2009 “Widać und słychać: zum Schicksal zweier erstarrter Infinitive.” InVon grammatischen Kategorien und sprachlichen Weltbildern – Die Slavia von der Sprachgeschichte bis zur Politsprache (Festschrift für Daniel Weiss zum 60. Geburtstag), ed. by Tilman Berger , Markus Giger , Sibylle Kurt and Imke Mendoza , 615–632. München – Wien: Sagner. ( = Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, Sonderband 73.)
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 2010a “Hearsay in European languages: toward an integrative account of grammatical and lexical marking.” InLinguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, ed. by Gabriele Diewald and Elena Smirnova , 59–129. Berlin – New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 2010b “Evidenzialität aus kognitiver Sicht.” InDie slavischen Sprachen im Licht der kognitiven Linguistik / Slavjanskie jazyki v kognitivnom aspekte, ed. by Tanja Anstatt and Boris Norman , 117–139. Wiesbaden, Harrassowitz.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 2013 “On the theoretical prerequisites of the crosslinguistic database on evidential markers”. Keynote paper presented in the Workshop on Evidentiality and Modality in European Languages: Cross-linguistic perspectives. 46th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea , 18–21 September 2013, Split University, Croatia.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Wiemer, Björn and Katerina Stathi
    2010 “Introduction: The database of evidential markers in European languages. A bird’s eye view of the conception of the database (the template and problems hidden beneath it).” InDatabase on evidentiality markers in European languages, ed. by Björn Wiemer and Katerina Stathi , 275–285. Special issue of STUF – Language Typology and Universals 63 (4).
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Wiemer, Björn and Veronika Kampf
    This issue “On conditions instantiating tip effects of epistemic and evidential meanings in Bulgarian.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics 29. Originally published in 2012 in Slověne2: 5–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Wiemer, Björn and Anna Socka
    (in print). “How much does pragmatics help to contrast the meaning of hearsay adverbs?” InEvidentials and Modals ed. by Chungmin Lee and Jinho Park . Leiden: Brill. (Current Research in the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface).
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Willett, Thomas
    1988 “A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticalization of evidentiality.” Studies in Language12: 51–97. doi: 10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error