Hearer-oriented processes of strength assignment

References

1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra
   2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Birkelund, Merete , Nølke, Henning and Rita Therkelsen
   (eds) 2009  La Polyphonie Linguistique . Special issue of Langue Française164.
   [Google Scholar]
3. De Brabanter, Philippe and Patrick Dendale
   (eds) 2008 Commitment. Issue of Belgian Journal of Linguistics22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/bjl.22
   https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.22 [Google Scholar]
4. Chafe, Wallace
   1986 “Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing.” InEvidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols , 261–272. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Clément, Fabrice
   2006 Les Mécanismes de la Crédulité. Genève: Librairie Droz. doi: 10.3917/droz.cleme.2006.01
   https://doi.org/10.3917/droz.cleme.2006.01 [Google Scholar]
6. Clément, Fabrice
   2010 “To trust or not to trust. Children’s social epistemology.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology1 (2). Special issue on Naive Epistemology. doi: 10.1007/s13164‑010‑0022‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-010-0022-3 [Google Scholar]
7. Coates, Jennifer
   1983 The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. London, Canberra: Croom Helm.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Coltier, Danielle ; Dendale, Patrick and Philippe De Brabanter
   (eds) 2009 La Notion de Prise en Charge en Linguistique. Special issue of Langue Française162.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cornillie, Bert and Nicole Delbecque
   2008 “Speaker Commitment: Back to the Speaker. Evidence from Spanish Alternations.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics22: 37–62. doi: 10.1075/bjl.22.03cor
   https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.22.03cor [Google Scholar]
10. Cornillie, Bert
    2009 “Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality: On the Close Relationship between two Different Categories.” Functions of Language16 (1): 44–62. doi: 10.1075/fol.16.1.04cor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.1.04cor [Google Scholar]
11. Dendale, Patrick and Danielle Coltier
    (eds) 2011 La Prise en Charge Enonciative: Etudes Théoriques et Empiriques. Paris – Bruxelles: De Boeck – Duculot.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Fitneva, Stanka, A
    2001 “Epistemic Marking and Reliability Judgements: Evidence from Bulgarian.” Journal of Pragmatics33: 401–420. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(00)00010‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00010-2 [Google Scholar]
13. Hart, Christopher
    2011 “Legitimizing Assertions and the Logico-Rhetorical Module: Evidence and Epistemic Vigilance in Media Discourse on Immigration.” Discourse Studies13 (6): 751–769. doi: 10.1177/1461445611421360
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611421360 [Google Scholar]
14. Hassler, Gerda
    2010 “Epistemic Modality and Evidentiality and their Determination on a Deictic Basis: the Case of Romance Languages.” InLinguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, ed. by Gabriele Diewald and Elena Smirnova , 223–248. Berlin, New-York: Mouton De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Ifantidou, Elly
    2000 “Procedural encoding of explicatures by the Modern Greek particle taha .” InPragmatic Markers and Propositional attitude, ed. by Gisle Andersen and Thorstein Fretheim , 119–144. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.79.06ifa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.79.06ifa [Google Scholar]
16. Ifantidou, Elly
    2001 Evidentials and Relevance. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.86
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.86 [Google Scholar]
17. Jary, Mark
    2010 Assertion. Basingstoke; New-York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230274617
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274617 [Google Scholar]
18. Jary, Mark
    2011 “Assertion, Relevance and the Declarative Mood.” InProcedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives, ed. by Victoria Escandell-Vidal , Manuel Leonetti and Aoife Ahern , 267–289. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Lyons, John
    1977 Semantics. London. New York: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lyons, John
    1995 Linguistic Semantics: an Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511810213
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810213 [Google Scholar]
21. Marín-Arrese, Juana I
    2007 “Commitment and Subjectivity in the Discourse of Opinion Columns and Leading Articles, a Corpus Study.” RAEL: Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada1: 82–98. (special issue titled Different Approaches to Newspaper Opinion Discourse, ed. by Isabel Alonso Belmonte (ed.)).
    [Google Scholar]
22. Marín-Arrese, Juana Isabel
    2011 “Epistemic Legitimizing Strategies, Commitment and Accountability in Discourse.” Discourse Studies13 (6): 789–797. doi: 10.1177/1461445611421360c
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611421360c [Google Scholar]
23. Mascaro, Olivier and Dan Sperber
    2009 “The Moral, Epistemic, and Mindreading Components of Children’s Vigilance towards Deception.” Cognition112: 367–380. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.012 [Google Scholar]
24. Matlock, Teenie
    1989 “Metaphor and the Grammaticalization of Evidentials.” Berkeley Linguistics Society15: 215–225. doi: 10.3765/bls.v15i0.1751
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v15i0.1751 [Google Scholar]
25. Mazzarella, Diana
    2013 ““Optimal Relevance” as a Pragmatic Criterion: The Role of Epistemic Vigilance.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics25: 20–45.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Moeschler, Jacques
    2013 “Is a Speaker-Based Pragmatics Possible? Or How Can a Hearer Infer a Speaker’s Commitment?” Journal of Pragmatics43: 84–97. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.019 [Google Scholar]
27. Morency, Patrick , Oswald, Steve and Louis de Saussure
    2008 “Explicitness, Implicitness and Commitment Attribution: A Cognitive Pragmatic Approach.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics22: 197–220. doi: 10.1075/bjl.22.10mor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.22.10mor [Google Scholar]
28. Nølke, Henning
    1994 La Dilution Linguistique des Responsabilités: Essai de Description Polyphonique des Marqueurs Evidentiels il semble que et il paraît que. InLes Sources du Savoir et leurs Marques Linguistiques, ed. by Patrick Dendale and Liliane Tasmowski , 84–94. Montrouge: Larousse.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Nuyts, Jan
    2001 Epistemic Modality, Language and Conceptualization: A Cognitive-Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.5 [Google Scholar]
30. Nuyts, Jan
    2006 “Modality: Overview and Linguistic Issues.” InThe Expression of Modality, ed. by William Frawley , 1–25. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Oswald, Steve
    2011 “From Interpretation to Consent: Arguments, Beliefs and Meaning.” Discourse Studies13 (6): 806–814. doi: 10.1177/1461445611421360e
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611421360e [Google Scholar]
32. Padilla Cruz, Manuel
    2012 “Epistemic Vigilance, Cautious Optimism and Sophisticated Understanding.” Research in Language10 (4): 365–386. doi: 10.2478/v10015‑011‑0040‑y
    https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-011-0040-y [Google Scholar]
33. Palmer, Frank Robert
    1986 Mood and Modality. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Papafragou, Anna
    2000a Modality: Issues in the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Papafragou, Anna
    2000b “On Speech-Act Modality.” Journal of Pragmatics32: 519–538. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00062‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00062-4 [Google Scholar]
36. Papafragou, Anna
    2006 “Epistemic Modality and Truth Conditions.” Lingua116: 1688–1702. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.05.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.05.009 [Google Scholar]
37. Pietrandrea, Paola
    2008 “ Certamente and Sicuramente. Encoding Dynamic and Discursive Aspects of Commitment in Italian.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics22: 221–246. doi: 10.1075/bjl.22.11pie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.22.11pie [Google Scholar]
38. Saussure, Louis de
    2011 Discourse Analysis, Cognition and Evidentials. Discourse Studies13 (6): 781–788. doi: 10.1177/1461445611421360b
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611421360b [Google Scholar]
39. Sperber, Dan , Clément, Fabrice , Heintz, Christophe , Mascaro, Olivier , Mercier, Hugo ; Origgi, Gloria and Deirdre Wilson
    2010 “Epistemic Vigilance.” Mind & Language25 (4): 359–393. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.2010.01394.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x [Google Scholar]
40. Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson
    1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd edition. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Traugott, Elizabeth
    2003 “Approaching Modality from the Perspective of Relevance Theory.” Language Sciences25 (6): 657–669. doi: 10.1016/S0388‑0001(03)00017‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(03)00017-2 [Google Scholar]
42. Traugott, Elizabeth and Richard B. Dasher
    2007 Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Willett, Thomas
    1988 “A Cross-Linguistic Survey of the Grammaticalization of Evidentiality.” Studies in Language12: 51–97. doi: 10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil [Google Scholar]
44. Wilson, Deirdre and Dan Sperber
    1993 “Linguistic Form and Relevance.” Lingua90: 1–25. doi: 10.1016/0024‑3841(93)90058‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(93)90058-5 [Google Scholar]
45. Wilson, Deirdre
    2011 “The Conceptual-Procedural Distinction: Past, Present and Future.” InProcedural meaning: problems and perspectives, ed. by Victoria Escandell-Vidal , Manuel Leonetti and Aoife Ahern , 3–31. Leiden: Brill. doi: 10.1108/S1472‑7870(2011)0000025005
    https://doi.org/10.1108/S1472-7870(2011)0000025005 [Google Scholar]
46. Wilson, Deirdre
    2012 “Modality and the Conceptual-Procedural Distinction.” InRelevance Theory: More than Understanding, ed. by Ewa Walaszewska and Agnieszka Piskorska , 23–43. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]