Metarepresentation and evidentiality in Spanish tense and mood

References

1. Ahern, Aoife
   2004 El subjuntivo: significado e inferencia. Un análisis basada en la teoría de la relevancia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Madrid: UNED.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ahern, Aoife
   2006 “Spanish mood, propositional attitudes and metarepresentation.” InWhere Semantics Meets Pragmatics: the Michigan State University Papers, ed. by Ken Turner and Klaus von Heusinger , 445–470. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ahern, Aoife , Amenós-Pons, José and Guijarro-Fuentes, Pedro
   2014 “Interfaces in the interpretation of mood alternation in L2 Spanish: Morpho-phonology, semantics and pragmatics.” EUROSLA Yearbook2014: 173–200. doi: 10.1075/eurosla.14.07ahe
   https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.14.07ahe [Google Scholar]
4. Ahern, Aoife , Amenós-Pons, José and Guijarro-Fuentes, Pedro
   . Forthcoming. “Mood interpretation in Spanish: towards an encompassing view of L1 and L2 interface variability.” InThe Acquisition of Romance languages ed. by Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes , María Juan Garau and Pilar Larrañaga . Berlin – New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Amenós-Pons, José
   2015 “Spanish ‘Imperfecto’ vs. French ‘Imparfait’ in Hypothetical Clauses: A Procedural Account.” Cahiers Chronos27: 243–271.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Belletti, Andrea , Elisa Bennati and Antonella Sorace
   2007 “Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: evidence from near-native Italian.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory2: 657–689. doi: 10.1007/s11049‑007‑9026‑9
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-007-9026-9 [Google Scholar]
7. Blakemore, Diane
   1987 Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bott, Oliver
   2010 The Processing of Events. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.162
   https://doi.org/10.1075/la.162 [Google Scholar]
9. Bres, Jacques
   2005 L’imparfait dit narratif. Paris: CNRS Editions.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chomsky, Noam
    1959 “A Review of B.F. Skinner’s Verbal Behaviour.” Language35: 26–58. doi: 10.2307/411334
    https://doi.org/10.2307/411334 [Google Scholar]
11. Chomsky, Noam
    1965 Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. De Saussure, Louis and Bertrand Sthioul
    1999 “L’imparfaif narratif : point de vue (et images du monde).” Cahiers de Praxématique32: 167–188.
    [Google Scholar]
13. De Saussure, Louis and Bertrand Sthioul
    2005 “Imparfait et enrichissement pragmatique.” Cahiers Chronos14: 103–120.
    [Google Scholar]
14. De Saussure, Louis
    2003 Temps et pertinence. Éléments de pragmatique cognitive du temps. Bruxelles: De Boeck – Duculot.
    [Google Scholar]
15. De Saussure, Louis
    2013 “Perspectival Interpretation of Tenses.” InTime, Language, Cognition and Reality, ed. by Kasia M. Jaszcolt and Louis de Saussure , 46–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589876.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589876.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
16. De Swart, Henriette
    1998 “Aspect shift and coercion.” Natural language and linguistic theory16: 347–385. doi: 10.1023/A:1005916004600
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005916004600 [Google Scholar]
17. De Swart, Henriette
    2000 “Tense, aspect and coercion in a cross-linguistic perspective.” InProceedings of the Berkeley Formal Grammar conference University of California. Berkeley, ed. by Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King . CSLI Publications.web.stanford.edu/group/cslipublications/cslipublications/LFG/5/bfg00/bfg00deswart.pdf (September 2015)
    [Google Scholar]
18. Egg, M
    2005 Flexible Semantics for Reinterpretation Phenomena. Stanford: CSLI.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Escandell-Vidal, Victoria and Manuel Leonetti
    2003 “On the quotative readings of Spanish Imperfecto.” Cuadernos de LingüísticaX: 135–154.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Escandell-Vidal, Victoria and Manuel Leonetti
    2000 “Categorías funcionales y semántica procedimental.” InCien años de investigación semántica: De Michel Bréal a la actualidad, vol. 1, ed. by Marcos Martínez , et al. , 363–378. Madrid: Coord. Clásicas.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Escandell-Vidal, Victoria and Manuel Leonetti
    2011 “On the Rigidity of Procedural Meaning.” InProcedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives, ed. by Victoria Escandell-Vidal , Manuel Leonetti and Aoife Ahern (eds.), 81–103. Leiden: Brill. doi: 10.1163/9780857240941
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9780857240941 [Google Scholar]
22. Escandell, Victoria , Manuel Leonetti and Aoife Ahern
    (eds.) 2011 Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives. Leiden: Brill. doi: 10.1163/9780857240941
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9780857240941 [Google Scholar]
23. Gili Gaya, Samuel
    1943 Curso superior de sintaxis española. Barcelona: Biblograf.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Ifantidou, Elly
    2001 Evidentials and Relevance. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.86
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.86 [Google Scholar]
25. Lakoff, George
    1974 “Dialogues with… George Lakoff.” InDiscussing language, ed. by Herman Parrett , 151–178. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Leonetti, Manuel
    2004 “Por qué el imperfecto es anafórico.” InEl pretérito imperfecto, ed. by Luis García Fernández and Bruno Camus Bergareche , 481–510. Madrid: Gredos.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Moeschler, Jacques
    1994 “Anaphore et déixis temporelles. Sémantique et pragmatique de la référence temporelle.” InLangage et pertinence. Référence temporelle, anaphore, connecteurs et métaphore, ed. by Jacques Moeschler , et al. , 39–105. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Moeschler, Jacques
    1998 “Pragmatique de la référence temporelle.” InLe temps des événements, ed. by Jacques Moeschler , 157–180. Paris: Kimé.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Moeschler, Jacques
    2002 “Pragmatics and linguistic encoding. Evidence from the conceptual/procedural distinction.”Unpublished manuscript. www.unige.ch/lettres/linguistique/moeschler (January 2010).
30. Moeschler Jacques , Cristina Grisotet and Bruno Cartoni
    2012 “Jusqu’où les temps verbaux sont-ils procéduraux?” Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française30: 119–139.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Montrul, Silvina and Roumyana Slabakova
    2002 “On aspectual shifts in L2 Spanish.” InBUCLD 26 Proceedings, ed. by Barbora Skarabela , et al. (eds.), 631–42. Somerville: MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Montrul, Silvina and Roumyana Slabakova
    2003 “Competence similarities between natives and near-native speakers: An investigation of the Preterit/Imperfect contrast in Spanish.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition25: 351–398. doi: 10.1017/S0272263103000159
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000159 [Google Scholar]
33. Nicolle, Steve
    1997 “A Relevance-theoretic account of be going to.” Journal of Linguistics33: 355–377. doi: 10.1017/S0022226797006567
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226797006567 [Google Scholar]
34. Nicolle, Steve
    1998 “A relevance theory perspective on grammaticalization.” Cognitive Linguistics9 (1): 1–35. doi: 10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.1 [Google Scholar]
35. Olmos, Susana and Aoife Ahern
    2009 “Contrast and propositional attitude. A relevance-theoretic analysis of contrast connectives in Spanish and English.” Lingua119 (1): 51–66. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.08.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.08.001 [Google Scholar]
36. Paradis, Michel
    2001/2009 “Cerebral division of labour in verbal communication.” InCognition and Pragmatics, ed. by Dominiek Sandra , Jan-Ola Östman and Jeff Verschueren , 53–77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hoph.3.04par
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.3.04par [Google Scholar]
37. Smith, Neil
    1990 “Observations on the pragmatics of tense.” University College London Working Papers in Linguistics2: 82–94.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Sorace, Antonella and Francesca Filiaci
    2006 “Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian.” Second Language Research22: 339–368. doi: 10.1191/0267658306sr271oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr271oa [Google Scholar]
39. Sorace, Antonella
    2011 “Pinning down the concept of ‘interface’ in bilingualism.” Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism1: 1–33. doi: 10.1075/lab.1.1.01sor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.1.1.01sor [Google Scholar]
40. Sperber, Danand and Deirdre Wilson
    1986/1995 Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Sthioul, Bertrand
    1998 Temps verbaux et point de vue. InLe temps des événements, ed. by Jacques Moeschler , 197–220. Paris: Kimé.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Tsimpli, Ianthi Maria and Antonella Sorace
    2006 “Differentiating Interfaces: L2 performance in syntax-semantics and syntax-discourse phenomena.” InProceedings of the 30th Boston University Conference on Language Development, ed. by David Bamman , Tatiana Magnitskaia , and Colleen Zaller , 653–664. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Vetters, Carl and Walter De Mulder
    2000 “Passé simple et imparfait: contenus conceptual et procédural.” Cahiers Chronos6: 13–36.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Vetters, Carl
    2003 “L’aspect global: un effet secondaire d’un contenu procédural?” Cahiers Chronos11: 113–131.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Vicente, Begoña
    2010 “The role of pragmatic inferencing in compositional semantics.” InExplicit Communication: Robyn Carston’s Pragmatics, ed. by Esther Romero and Belén Soria , 58–74. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
46. White, Lydia
    2009 “Grammatical Theory: Interfaces and L2 knowledge.” InHandbook of Second Language Acquisition, ed. by William Ritchie and Tej K. Bhatia , 49–67. Bingley: Emerald.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Wilson, Deirdre and Dan Sperber
    1993 “Linguistic form and Relevance.” Lingua90: 1–25. doi: 10.1016/0024‑3841(93)90058‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(93)90058-5 [Google Scholar]