Volume 30, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0774-5141
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9676
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


The present study combines recent interest on the impact of unconventional individual language use on grammar change ( Petré and Van de Velde 2014 , De Smet 2016 ) with research on how conventional grammar impacts on language users. To better understand their interplay, I will zoom in on the interaction of unconventional and conventional behaviour of individuals in the developments of [ V] and [ | INF]. Apart from enhancing our understanding of the long-term effects of the urge to be expressive, an important outcome of the analysis will be that it is precisely the way in which the spiral of the conventional leads to the unconventional to the conventional again, which may help explain the phenomenon of unidirectionality in language change.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Beckner, Clay , Richard Blythe , Joan Bybee , Morten H. Christiansen , William Croft , Nick C. Ellis , John Holland , Jinyun Ke , Diane Larsen-Freeman , & Tom Schoenemann
    2009 “Language is a Complex Adaptive System: Position Paper.” Language learning59 (1): 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergs, Alexander
    2005Social Networks and Historical Sociolinguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110923223
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110923223 [Google Scholar]
  3. Blythe, Richard A. , and William Croft
    2012 “S-curves and the Mechanisms of Propagation in Language Change.” Language88 (2): 269–304. doi: 10.1353/lan.2012.0027
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0027 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brinton, Laurel
    1996Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110907582
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907582 [Google Scholar]
  5. Budts, Sara , and Peter Petré
    2016 “Reading the Intentions of be going to. On the Subjectification of Future Markers.” Folia Linguistica Historica37: 1–32. doi: 10.1515/flih‑2016‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flih-2016-0001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bybee, Joan
    2010Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
  7. Croft, William
    2000Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. De Smet, Hendrik
    2016 “How Gradual Change Progresses: The Interaction between Convention and Innovation.” Language Variation and Change28: 83–102. doi: 10.1017/S0954394515000186
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394515000186 [Google Scholar]
  9. De Smet, Hendrik , and Liesbet Heyvaert
    2011 “The Meaning of the English Present Participle.” English Language and Linguistics15 (3): 473–498. doi: 10.1017/S136067431100013X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S136067431100013X [Google Scholar]
  10. De Wit, Astrid , and Frank Brisard
    2014 “A Cognitive Grammar Account of the Semantics of the English Present Progressive.” Journal of Linguistics50 (1): 49–90. doi: 10.1017/S0022226713000169
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226713000169 [Google Scholar]
  11. Detges, Ulrich , and Richard Waltereit
    2002 “Grammaticalization vs. Reanalysis: A Semantic-Pragmatic Account of Functional Change in Grammar.” Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft21: 151–195. doi: 10.1515/zfsw.2002.21.2.151
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsw.2002.21.2.151 [Google Scholar]
  12. Disney, Steve
    2009 “The Grammaticalisation of be going to .” Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics15: 63–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fitzmaurice, Susan
    2004 “The Meanings and Uses of the Progressive Construction in an Early Eighteenth-Century English Network.” InStudies in the History of the English Language II, ed. by Anne Curzan , and Kimberly Emmons , 131–174. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110897661.131
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110897661.131 [Google Scholar]
  14. Fludernik, Monika
    1992 “The Historical Present Tense in English Literature: An Oral pattern and its Literary Adaptation.” Language and Literature17: 77–107.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Garrett, Andrew
    2012 “The Historical Syntax Problem: Reanalysis and Directionality.” InGrammatical Change: Origins, Nature, Outcomes, ed. by Dianne Jonas et al. , 52–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Haspelmath, Martin
    1999 “Why is Grammaticalization Irreversible?” Linguistics37: 1043–1068. doi: 10.1515/ling.37.6.1043
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.37.6.1043 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hilpert, Martin
    2008Germanic Future Constructions: A Usage-Based Approach to Language Change. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.7 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hopper, Paul J. , and Elizabeth C. Traugott
    2003Grammaticalization, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jäger, Gerhard , and Anette Rosenbach
    2008 “Priming and Unidirectional Language Change.” Theoretical Linguistics34 (2): 85–113. doi: 10.1515/THLI.2008.008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/THLI.2008.008 [Google Scholar]
  20. Jespersen, Otto
    1917Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: Høst.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Keller, Rudi
    1994On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kemenade, Ans van , and Bettelou Los
    2006 “Discourse Adverbs and Clausal Syntax in Old and Middle English.” InThe Handbook of the History of English, ed. by Ans van Kemenade , and Bettelou Los , 224–48. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470757048.ch10
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757048.ch10 [Google Scholar]
  23. Killie, Kristin
    2008 “From Locative to Durative to Focalized? The English Progressive and ‘PROG Imperfective Drift’.” InEnglish historical linguistics 2006, vol. 1: Historical syntax and morphology. Selected papers from the fourteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 14), Bergamo, 21–25 August 2006, ed. by Gotti Maurizio , Marina Dossena , and Richard Dury , 69–88. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.295.07kil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.295.07kil [Google Scholar]
  24. Klein, Wolfgang
    1994Time in Language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kranich, Svenja
    2010The Progressive in Modern English: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization and Related Changes. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi. doi: 10.1163/9789042031449
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042031449 [Google Scholar]
  26. Krug, Manfred G.
    2000Emerging English modals: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization (Topics in English Linguistics 32). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110820980
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110820980 [Google Scholar]
  27. Mair, Christian
    2004 “Corpus Linguistics and Grammaticalisation Theory: Statistics, Frequencies, and Beyond.” InCorpus Approaches to Grammaticalization in English, ed. by Hans Lindquist , and Christian Mair , 121–150. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.13.07mai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.13.07mai [Google Scholar]
  28. Meillet, Antoine
    1912 “L’évolution des formes grammaticales [The evolution of grammatical forms].” Scientia12: 130–148.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Michaelis, Laura A.
    2003 “Headless Constructions and Coercion by Construction.” InMismatch: Form-Function Incongruity and the Architecture of Grammar (CSLI publications 115), ed. by Elaine Francis , and Laura A. Michaelis , 259–310. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Nesselhauf, Nadja
    2010 “The Development of Future Time Expressions in Late Modern English: Redistribution of Forms or Change in Discourse?” English Language and Linguistics14 (2): 163–186. doi: 10.1017/S1360674310000043
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674310000043 [Google Scholar]
  31. Nevalainen, Terttu , Helena Raumolin-Brunberg , and Heikki Mannila
    2011 “The Diffusion of Language Change in Real-Time: Progressive and Conservative Individuals and the Time Depth of Change.” Language Variation and Change23: 1–43. doi: 10.1017/S0954394510000207
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394510000207 [Google Scholar]
  32. Petré, Peter
    2013EEBOCorp, version 1.0. Leuven: University of Leuven Linguistics Department.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 2014Constructions and Environments: Copular, Passive and Related Constructions in Old and Middle English (Oxford Studies in the History of English 4). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199373390.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199373390.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  34. 2016 “Grammaticalization by Changing Co-Text Frequencies, or why [be Ving] Became the ‘Progressive’.” English Language and Linguistics. 20 (1): 31–54. doi: 10.1017/S1360674315000210
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674315000210 [Google Scholar]
  35. . Forthcoming for 2017. “The extravagant progressive. An experimental corpus study on the history of emphatic [be Ving].” English Language and linguistics21.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Petré, Peter , and Freek Van de Velde
    2014 “Tracing Real-Life Agents’ Individual Progress in Ongoing Grammaticalization.” InHow Grammaticalization Processes Create Grammar (workshop held at EVOLANG10, Vienna, Austria, 14–17 April 2014) Proceedings, ed. by Luc Steels , and Remi van Trijp . (emergent-languages.org/wp-content/papercite-data/pdf/proceedings.pdf)
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Pickering, Martin J. , and Victor S. Ferreira
    2008 “Structural Priming: A Critical Review.” Psychological Bulletin134 (3): 427–459. (accessed online at:www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2657366/) doi: 10.1037/0033‑2909.134.3.427.
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.427 [Google Scholar]
  38. Pons-Sanz, Sara
    2014The Language of Early English Literature: from Cædmon to Milton. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena , and Arja Nurmi
    2011 “Grammaticalization and Language Change in the Individual.” InHandbook of Grammaticalisation, ed. by Heiko Narrog , and Bernard Heine , 251–262. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Sankoff, G.
    2006 “Age: Apparent Time and Real Time.” Elsevier Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Second Edition, Article Number: LALI: 01479. doi: 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/01479‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01479-6 [Google Scholar]
  41. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    2008 “‘All that he endeavoured to prove was…’: On the Emergence of Grammatical Constructions in Dialogic Contexts.” InLanguage in Flux: Dialogue Coordination, Language Variation, Change and Evolution, ed. by Robin Cooper , and Ruth Kempson , 143–177. London: Kings College.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2010 “Dialogic Contexts as Motivations for Syntactic Change.” InStudies in the History of the English language V. Variation and Change in English Grammar and Lexicon: Contemporary Approaches, ed. by Robert A. Cloutier , Anne Marie Hamilton-Brehm , and William A. Kretzschmar, Jr. , 11–27. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 2012 “On the Persistence of Ambiguous Linguistic Context over Time: Implications for Corpus Research on Micro-Changes”. InCorpus Linguistics and Variation in English: Theory and Description, ed. by Joybrato Mukherjee , and Magnus Hüber , 231–246. Amsterdam: Rodopi. doi: 10.1163/9789401207713_019
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401207713_019 [Google Scholar]
  44. 2015 “Toward a Coherent Account of Grammatical Constructionalization.” InDiachronic Construction Grammar, ed. by Jóhanna Barðdal , Elena Smirnova , Lotte Sommerer , and Spike Gildea , 51–80. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.18.02tra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.02tra [Google Scholar]
  45. Traugott, Elizabeth C. , and Graeme Trousdale
    2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes (Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  46. van de Pol, Nikki
    2016The Development of the Absolute Construction in English: Between Bird’s Eye View and Magnifying Glass. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Leuven.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Westergaard, Marit
    2009 “Word order in Old and Middle English: The Role of Information Structure and First Language Acquisition.” Diachronica26 (1): 65–102. doi: 10.1075/dia.26.1.03wes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.26.1.03wes [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error