Volume 30, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0774-5141
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9676
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


One major lesson learned in the cognitive sciences is that even basic human cognitive capacities are extraordinarily complicated and elusive to mechanistic explanations. This is definitely the case for naming and identity. Nothing seems simpler than using a proper name to refer to a unique individual object in the world. But psychological research has shown that the criteria and mechanisms by which humans establish and use names are unclear and seemingly contradictory. Children only develop the necessary knowledge and skills after years of development and naming degenerates in unusual selective ways with strokes, schizophrenia, or Alzheimer disease. Here we present an operational model of social interaction patterns and cognitive functions to explain how naming can be achieved and acquired. We study the Grounded Naming Game as a particular example of a symbolic interaction that requires naming and present mechanisms that build up and use the semiotic networks necessary for performance in the game. We demonstrate in experiments with autonomous physical robots that the proposed dynamical systems indeed lead to the formation of an effective naming system and that the model hence explains how naming and identity can get socially constructed and shared by a population of embodied agents.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Baronchelli, Andrea , Vittorio Loreto , and Luc Steels
    2008 “In-depth analysis of the Naming Game dynamics: the homogeneous mixing case.” Int. J. of Mod. Phys. C19 (785).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berger, Peter L. and Thomas Luckmann
    1966The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. NY: Anchor Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bischop, Christopher M.
    1995Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dall’Asta, Luca , Andrea Baronchelli , Allain Barrat , and Vittorio Loreto
    2006 “Nonequilibrium dynamics of language games on complex networks.” Phys. Rev. E74 (3): 036105. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.036105
    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.74.036105 [Google Scholar]
  5. De Vylder, Bart and Karl Tuyls
    2006 “How to reach linguistic consensus: A proof of convergence for the naming game.” Journal of Theoretical Biology242 (4): 818–831. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.05.024
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.05.024 [Google Scholar]
  6. DeLeon, Jessica , Rebecca F. Gottesman , Jonathan T. Kleinman , Melissa Newhart , Cameron Davis , Jennifer Heidler-Gary , Andrew Lee , and Argye E. Hillis
    2007 “Neural regions essential for distinct cognitive processes underlying picture naming.” Brain130: 1408–1422. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm011 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dominey, Peter F. and Jean-David Boucher
    2005 “Developmental stages of perception and language acquisition in a perceptually grounded robot.” Cognitive Systems Research6 (3): 243–259. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2004.11.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2004.11.005 [Google Scholar]
  8. Fujita, Masahiro , Yoshihiro Kuroki , Tatsuzo Ishida , and Toshi Doi
    2003 “Autonomous behavior control architecture of entertainment humanoid robot SDR-4X.” InProceedings of IROS 2003, Volume1, 960–967. Las Vegas, Nevada: IEEE.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Galantucci, Bruno
    2008 “An experimental study of the emergence of human communication systems.” Cognitive Science25 (5): 737–767.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gutheil, Grant , Susan A. Gelman , Eileen Klein , Katherine Michos , and Kara Kelaita
    2008 “Preschoolers’ use of spatiotemporal history, appearance, and proper name in determining individual identity.” Cognition107 (1): 366–380. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.014 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hirsch, Joy , Diana R. Moreno , and Karl H.S. Kim
    2001 “Interconnected large-scale systems for three fundamental cognitive tasks revealed by functional MRI.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience13 (3): 389–405. doi: 10.1162/08989290151137421
    https://doi.org/10.1162/08989290151137421 [Google Scholar]
  12. Humphreys, Glyn W. , M. Jane Riddoch , and Cathy J. Price
    1997 “Top-down processes in object identification: evidence from experimental psychology, neuropsychology and functional anatomy.” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B352: 1275–1282. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0110
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1997.0110 [Google Scholar]
  13. Kahneman, Daniel , Anne Treisman , and Brian J. Gibbs
    1992 “The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information.” Cognitive Psychology24: 174–219. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0285(92)90007‑O
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90007-O [Google Scholar]
  14. Kalman, Rudolf Emil
    1960 “A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems.” Transactions of the ASME-Journal of Basic Engineering82 (1): 35–45. doi: 10.1115/1.3662552
    https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3662552 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kohonen, Teuvo
    1982 “Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps.” Biological Cybernetics43 (1): 59–69. doi: 10.1007/BF00337288
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00337288 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kripke, Saul A.
    1980Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Piaget, Jean
    1954The Construction of Reality in the Child. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. doi: 10.1037/11168‑000
    https://doi.org/10.1037/11168-000 [Google Scholar]
  18. Plebe, Alessio
    2007 “A Neural Model of Object Naming.” Proceedings of the World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology20: 232–237.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Qiming, Lu , Gyorgy Korniss , and Boleslaw Szymanski
    2006 “Naming Games in Spatially-Embedded Random Networks.” InProceedings of AAAI Symposium, 148–155. AAAI. arXiv:cs/0604075v3.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Rao, S. Chenchal , Gregor Rainer , and Earl K. Miller
    1997 “Integration of what and where in the primate prefrontal cortex.” Science276: 821–824. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5313.821
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5313.821 [Google Scholar]
  21. Rosch, Eleanor
    1975 “Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General104 (3): 192–233. doi: 10.1037/0096‑3445.104.3.192
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192 [Google Scholar]
  22. Roy, Deb
    2005 “Grounding Words in Perception and Action: Computational Insights..“ Trends in Cognitive Sciences9 (8): 389–396. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.06.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.06.013 [Google Scholar]
  23. Roy, Deb and Alex Pentland
    2002 “Learning words from sights and sounds: a computational model.” Cognitive Science26 (1): 113–146. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2601_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2601_4 [Google Scholar]
  24. Scholl, Brian J.
    2007 “Object persistence in philosophy and psychology.” Mind & Language22 (5): 563–591. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.2007.00321.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2007.00321.x [Google Scholar]
  25. Selten, Reinhard and Massimo Warglien
    2007 “The emergence of simple languages in an experimental coordination game.” PNAS18 (104): 73617366.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Sorrentino, Christina M.
    2001 “Children and adults represent proper names as referring to unique individuals.” Developmental Science4 (4): 399–407. doi: 10.1111/1467‑7687.00181
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00181 [Google Scholar]
  27. Spelke, Elizabeth S.
    1990 “Principles of object perception.” Cognitive Science14 (1): 29–56. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1401_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1401_3 [Google Scholar]
  28. Steels, Luc
    2001 “Language games for autonomous robots.. “ IEEE Intelligent Systems16 (5): 16–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2005 “The Emergence and Evolution of Linguistic Structure: From Lexical to Grammatical Communication Systems..“ Connection Science17 (3): 213–230. doi: 10.1080/09540090500269088
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09540090500269088 [Google Scholar]
  30. Steels, Luc and Tony Belpaeme
    2005 “Coordinating perceptually grounded categories through language: A case study for colour.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences28 (4): 469–489. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X05000087
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000087 [Google Scholar]
  31. Steels, Luc and Frédéric Kaplan
    1999 “Situated Grounded Word Semantics.” InProceedings IJCAI’99, ed. by Thomas Dean , 862–867. Stockholm, Sweden: Morgan Kaufmann.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Steels, Luc and Angus McIntyre
    1995 “A Self-Organizing Spatial Vocabulary.” Artificial Life2 (3): 319–332. doi: 10.1162/artl.1995.2.3.319
    https://doi.org/10.1162/artl.1995.2.3.319 [Google Scholar]
  33. 1997 “Spatially Distributed Naming Games.” Advances in Complex systems1 (4): 301–302. doi: 10.1142/S021952599800020X
    https://doi.org/10.1142/S021952599800020X [Google Scholar]
  34. Steels, Luc and Paul Vogt
    1997 “Grounding Adaptive Language Games in Robotic Agents.” InProceedings ALIFE’97, ed. by Phil Husbands and Inman Harvey , 473–484. Brighton, U.K.: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Woollams, Anna M. , Elisa Cooper-Pye , John R. Hodges , and Karalyn Patterson
    2008 “Anomia: A doubly typical signature of semantic dementia.” Neuropsychologia46: 2503–2514. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.04.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.04.005 [Google Scholar]
  36. Xu, Fei
    1999 “Object individuation and object identity in infancy: the role of spatiotemporal information, object property information, and language.” Acta Psychologica102: 113–136. doi: 10.1016/S0001‑6918(99)00029‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00029-3 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error