Volume 30, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0774-5141
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9676
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


The present paper proposes an operational semantic model of natural language quantifiers (e.g., ) and their use in quantified noun phrases. To this end we use embodied artificial agents that communicate in and interact with the physical world. We argue that existing paradigms such as Generalized Quantifiers ( Barwise and Cooper 1981 ; Montague 1973 ) and Fuzzy Quantifiers ( Zadeh 1983 ) do not provide a satisfactory models for our situated-interaction scenarios and propose a more adequate semantic model, based on fuzzy-quantification.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Barwise, Jon and Robin Cooper
    1981 “Generalized quantifiers and natural language.” Linguistics and philosophy4 (2): 159–219. doi: 10.1007/BF00350139
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00350139 [Google Scholar]
  2. Glöckner, Ingo
    2006Fuzzy quantifiers: a computational theory. Springer Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kurita, Takio
    1991 “An efficient agglomerative clustering algorithm using a heap.” Pattern Recognition24 (3): 205–209. doi: 10.1016/0031‑3203(91)90062‑A
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-3203(91)90062-A [Google Scholar]
  4. Lappin, Shalom
    1997The handbook of contemporary semantic theory. Blackwell. doi: 10.1111/b.9780631207498.1997.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631207498.1997.x [Google Scholar]
  5. 2000 “An intensional parametric semantics for vague quantifiers.” Linguistics and philosophy23 (6): 599–620. doi: 10.1023/A:1005638918877
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005638918877 [Google Scholar]
  6. Montague, Richard
    1973 “The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English.” InApproaches to Natural Language. Proceedings of the 1970 Stanford Workshop on Grammar and Semantics, ed. by Jaakko Hintikka , Julius Moravcsik , and Patrick Suppes , 221–242. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Pauw, Michael and Joseph Hilferty
    2012 “The Emergence of Quantifiers.” InExperiments in Cultural Language Evolution, ed. by Luc Steels , 277–304. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ais.3.14pau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.3.14pau [Google Scholar]
  8. Pauw, Simon and Michael Spranger
    2010 “Embodied Determiners.” InProceedings of Language Evolution and Computation Workshop at ESSLLI 2010, ed. by Marija Slavkovik , 184–192. Copenhagen: ESSLLI.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Rosch, Eleanor and Barbara B. Lloyd
    (eds) 1978Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Sapir, Edward
    1944 “Grading, a study in semantics.” Philosophy of Science11 (2): 93–116. doi: 10.1086/286828
    https://doi.org/10.1086/286828 [Google Scholar]
  11. Spranger, Michael
    2008 “World Models for Grounded Language Games.” German diplom (master) thesis, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin.
  12. 2012a “The Co-Evolution of Basic Spatial Terms and Categories.” InExperiments in Cultural Language Evolution, ed. by Luc Steels , 111–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ais.3.07spr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.3.07spr [Google Scholar]
  13. 2012b “Emergent Functional Grammar for Space.” InExperiments in Cultural Language Evolution, ed. by Luc Steels , 207–232. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ais.3.11spr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.3.11spr [Google Scholar]
  14. Spranger, Michael and Martin Loetzsch
    2009 “The semantics of SIT, STAND, and LIE embodied in robots.” InProceedings of the 31th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (Cogsci09), ed. by Niels A. Taatgen and Henderik van Rijn , 2546–2552. Austin, TX.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Spranger, Michael , Martin Loetzsch , and Simon Pauw
    2010 “Open-ended Grounded Semantics.” InProceedings of the 19th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-2010), ed. by Helder Coelho , Rudi Studer , and Michael Wooldridge , Volume215, 929–934. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Spranger, Michael , Simon Pauw , and Martin Loetzsch
    2010 “Open-ended semantics co-evolving with spatial language.” InThe Evolution of Language (Evolang 8), ed. by Andrew D. M. Smith , Marieke Schouwstra , Bart de Boer , and Kenny Smith , 297–304. Singapore: World Scientific Press. doi: 10.1142/9789814295222_0038
    https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814295222_0038 [Google Scholar]
  17. Steels, Luc
    2001 “Language games for autonomous robots.” IEEE Intelligent Systems16 (5): 16–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Van Den Broeck, Wouter
    2008 “Constraint-based compositional semantics.” InThe Evolution of Language (EVOLANG 7), ed. by Andrew D. M. Smith , Kenny Smith , and Ramon Ferrer i Cancho , 338–345. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. doi: 10.1142/9789812776129_0043
    https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812776129_0043 [Google Scholar]
  19. Westerståhl, D.
    1995 “Quantifiers in natural language: A survey of some recent work.” InQuantifiers: Logics, Models and Computation. Volume One: Suverys, ed. by Michal Krynicki , Marcin Mostowksi , and Leslaw W. Szczerba , Volume248of Synthese Library, 359–408. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑0522‑6_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0522-6_11 [Google Scholar]
  20. Winogrady, Terry
    1980 “What does it mean to understand language?.” Cognitive science4 (3): 209–241. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0403_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0403_1 [Google Scholar]
  21. Zadeh, Lotfi A.
    1965 “Fuzzy Sets.” Information and control8 (3): 338–353. doi: 10.1016/S0019‑9958(65)90241‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X [Google Scholar]
  22. 1983 “A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages.” Computers & Mathematics with Applications9 (1): 149–184. doi: 10.1016/0898‑1221(83)90013‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-1221(83)90013-5 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error