1887
Volume 2, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1566-5836
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9706
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The thesis of this article is that an attitude akin to pragmatism is internal to the scientific enterprise itself, and as a result many scientists will make the same types of non-essentialistic interpretations of their subject matter that are made by pragmatists. This is demonstrably true with respect to those scientists who study the biological basis of emotion such as Panksepp, LeDoux, and Damasio. Even though these scientists are also influenced by what cognitive psychologists call the essentialist bias, their research programs are coherent with Peter Zachar’s rejection of natural kinds in favor of practical kinds. When the confrontation with complexity leads a scientist to offer non-essentialist interpretations, two popular options are to go eliminativist or go nominalist. Pragmatists prefer the nominalistic option, and we provide reasons for suggesting that scientists should as well.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ce.2.2.02zac
2001-01-01
2019-10-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ce.2.2.02zac
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): consciousness. , eliminativism , emotion , essentialism , natural kind , nominalism and pragmatism
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error