Volume 9, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1876-1933
  • E-ISSN: 1876-1941
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


Russian boasts a highly complex aspectual system which can appear irregular and difficult to learn. It has recently been suggested that motion verbs, which are normally seen as exceptional in their nature, may in fact be at the core of this system, motivating aspectual behavior based on stem directionality. This suggests that analyzing motion verbs may help understand the Russian aspectual system as a whole. The present work demonstrates how Russian motion verbs and their aspectual partners can be implemented and processed successfully with Fluid Constructional Grammar. The study presents an example of language processing in both production and comprehension in operation and highlights the flexibility and power of this formalism, despite the challenges that this complex aspectual system poses.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Beuls, K.
    (2011) Construction sets and unmarked forms: A case study for Hungarian verbal agreement. In L. Steels (Ed.), Design patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar (pp.237–264). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.11.13beu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.11.13beu [Google Scholar]
  2. Bottger, K.
    (2004) Grammaticalization the derivational way: The Russian aspecutal prefixes: po-, za-, ot-. In W. Bisang & N. Himmelmann (Eds.), What makes grammaticalization?A Look from its fringes and its components (pp.187–210). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dickey, S.
    (2007) A prototype account of the development of the delimitative po- in Russian. In D. Divjak & A. Kochanska (Eds.), Cognitive paths into the Slavic domain (pp.329–374). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110198799.4.329
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198799.4.329 [Google Scholar]
  4. Gagarina, N.
    (2009) Verbs of motion in Russian: An acquisitional perspective. The Slavic and East European Journal, Special Forum Issue: Teaching and Learning Russian Verbs of Motion, 53(3), 451–470.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gerasymova, K.
    (2010) Emergence of aktionsarten: The first step towards aspect. In A. Smith , M. Schouwstra , B. de Boer & K. Smith (Eds.), The evolution of language (Evolang8) (pp.145–152). Singapore: World Scientific. doi: 10.1142/9789814295222_0019
    https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814295222_0019 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2012) Expressing grammatical meaning with morphology: A case study for Russian aspect. In L. Steels (Ed.), Computational issues in Fluid Construction Grammar, volume 7249 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp.91–122). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gerasymova, K. , & Spranger, M.
    (2012) An experiment in temporal language learning. In L. Steels & M. Hild (Eds.), Language grounding in robots (pp.237–254). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4614‑3064‑3_12
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3064-3_12 [Google Scholar]
  8. Gerasymova, K. , Spranger, M. , & Beuls, K.
    (2012) A language strategy for aspect: Encoding aktionsarten through morphology. In L. Steels (Ed.), Experiments in cultural language evolution [Advances in Interaction Studies 3] (p.p.257–276). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ais.3.13ger
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.3.13ger [Google Scholar]
  9. Janda, L.
    (2007) Aspectual clusters of Russian verbs. Studies in Language, 31(3), 607–648. doi: 10.1075/sl.31.3.04jan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.31.3.04jan [Google Scholar]
  10. (2008a) Semantic motivations for aspectual clusters of Russian verbs. In C. Y. Bethin (Ed.), American Contributions to the 14th International Congress of Slavists (pp.181–196). Columbus, OH: Slavica Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Janda, L. A.
    (2008b) Motion verbs and the development of aspect in Russian. Scando-Slavica, 54(1), 179–197. doi: 10.1080/00806760802494265
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00806760802494265 [Google Scholar]
  12. Janda, L.
    (2009) Totally normal chaos: The aspectual behavior of Russian motion verbs. Harvard Ukrainian Studies, 28, 183–193.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2010) Perfectives from non-determined motion verbs in Russian. In V. Hasko & R. Perelmutter (Eds.), New approaches to Slavic verbs of motion (pp.125–140). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.115.09jan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.115.09jan [Google Scholar]
  14. Marques, T. , & Beuls, K.
    (2016) Evaluation strategies for computational construction grammars. InProceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers (pp.1137–1146). Osaka, Japan.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Nesset, T. (2008) Path and manner: An image-schematic approach to Russian verbs of motion. Scando-Slavica, 54, 135–158. doi: 10.1080/00806760802494232
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00806760802494232 [Google Scholar]
  16. Nikolaev, V.
    (2012) Za-perfectives in Russian motion verbs. PhD thesis. Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Steels, L.
    (2011a) (Ed.). Design patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.11
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.11 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2011b) A first encounter with Fluid Construction Grammar. In L. Steels (Ed.), Design patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar (pp.31–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.11.04ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.11.04ste [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error