Jiyoung Yoon & Stefan Th. Gries (editors). 2016. Corpus-based Approaches to Construction Grammar

References

1. Beliën, M.
   (2016) A constructional perspective on conceptual consituency. Dutch postpositions or particles?In S. Th. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based Approaches to Construction Grammar (pp.11–37). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.19.02bel
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.19.02bel [Google Scholar]
2. Beuls, K. , & Remi van Trijp
   (2016) Computational construction grammar and constructional change. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 30, 1–13. doi: 10.1075/bjl.30.01beu
   https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.30.01beu [Google Scholar]
3. Boon, T. den , & Dirk Geeraerts
   (Eds.) (2005) Van Dale Groot woordenboek van de Nederlandse taal. 14th ed.Antwerpen/Utrecht: Van Dale Lexicography.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Divjak, D. and S. Th. Gries
   (2006) Ways of Trying in Russian: Clustering Behavioral Profiles. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2(1), 23–60. doi: 10.1515/CLLT.2006.002
   https://doi.org/10.1515/CLLT.2006.002 [Google Scholar]
5. Gries, S. Th
   (2006) Corpus-based methods and cognitive semantics. The many senses of to run. In S. Th. Gries & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Corpora in cognitive linguistics. Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis, 57–99. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110197709.57
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197709.57 [Google Scholar]
6. Gries, S. Th. , J. Newman and C. Shaoul
   (2011) N-grams and the clustering of registers. Empirical Language Research Journal5(11).
   [Google Scholar]
7. Janda, L.
   (Ed.) (2013) Cognitive linguistics. the quantitative turn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110335255
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110335255 [Google Scholar]
8. Langacker, R.
   (1995) Conceptual grouping and constituency in cognitive grammar. In I. Lee (Ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm 3 (pp.149–172). Seoul: Hanshin.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Langacker, R.
   Langacker, R. (1997) Constituency, dependency and conceptual grouping. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(1), 1–32. doi: 10.1515/cogl.1997.8.1.1
   https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1997.8.1.1 [Google Scholar]
10. Levshina, N. , & K. Heylen
    (2014) A radically data-driven Construction Grammar: Experiments with Dutch causative constructions. In R. Boogaart , T. Colleman & G. Rutten (Eds.), Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar (pp.17–46). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Talmy, L.
    (1991) Path to realization. A typology of event conflation. In L. Sutton , C. Johnson & R. Shields (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventeenth annual Berkeley linguistics society (pp.480–519). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Talmy, L.
    (2000) Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Vazquez Rozas, V. , & V. G. Miglio
    (2016) Constructions with subject vs. object experiencer in Spanish and Italian. A corpus-based approach. In J. Yoon & S. Th. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based Approaches to Construction Grammar (pp.65–101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.19.04roz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.19.04roz [Google Scholar]
14. Yoon, J. , & S. Th. Gries
    (2016) Corpus-based approaches to Construction Grammar. Introduction. In J. Yoon & S. Th. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to Construction Grammar, 1–7. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.19.01yoo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.19.01yoo [Google Scholar]